Theory and History of Suspension Bridge Design from 1823 to 1940
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 3
Abstract
Within the context of a historical overview, this paper examines how the history and theory of suspension bridges affected their design between 1823 and 1940. Navier's theory of the unstiffened suspension bridge reveals the concept of cable stiffness. The experience of wind‐induced motion in 19th century bridges was a primary influence in the adoption of the stiffening truss, and the Rankine theory, which first considered such trasses, resembles a simple beam solution. The subsequent elastic theory as shown in this paper also resembles a simple beam solution. A reformulation of the deflection theory presented here allows for a physical interpretation and comparison to the previous theories. In examining these theories, this paper gives results of sample calculations based on the Monongahela, Delaware River, and George Washington Bridges; these specific examples reveal certain properties of the theories that emphasize the importance of physical understanding to the use of mathematical theories.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barlow, P. W. (1858). “On the mechanical effect of combining girder and suspension chains.” J. Franklin Inst., 35(3rd series).
2.
Barlow, P. W. (1860). Observations on the Niagara railway suspension bridge. John Weale, London, England.
3.
Bender, C. (1872). “Historical sketch of the successive improvements in suspension bridges to the present time.” Trans., ASCE, Vol. 1.
4.
Dana, A., Andersen, A., and Rapp, G. M. (1933). “George Washington Bridge: design of superstructure.” Trans., ASCE, Vol. 97.
5.
DuBois, A. J. (1882). “A new theory of the suspension system with stiffening truss.” J. Franklin Inst., 33(3rd series).
6.
Ellet, C. (1848). “Report on a rail‐way suspension bridge across the Connecticut, at Middleton.” Order of Reference.
7.
Ellet, C. (1851). “Report on the Wheeling and Belmont Suspension Bridge.” Order of Reference of the Supreme Court of the United States, George F. White, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.
8.
Fairbairn, W. (1849). An account of the construction of the Britannia and Conway tubular bridges. John Weale, London, England.
9.
Finch, J.K. (1941). “Wind failures of suspension bridges.” Engrg. News‐Record, (March 13, 1941).
10.
Gimsing, N. J. (1983). Cable supported bridges. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
11.
Hopkins, H. J. (1970). A span of bridges. Praeger, New York, N.Y.
12.
Johnson, J. B., Bryan, C. W., and Turneaure, F. E. (1910). “Suspension bridges.” The theory and practice of modern framed structures, John Wiley, New York, N.Y.
13.
Levy, M. (1886). “Calcul des ponts suspendus rigides.” Annales des ponts et chaussées, mémoires et documents, 12(2nd part) (in French).
14.
Martin. (1927). “The theory of the stiffened suspension bridge.” Engrg., London, England, 123(April 29, 1927).
15.
Melan, J. (1888). “Theorie der eisernen Bogenbrücken und der Hängebrücken.” Handbuch der Ingenieurwissenschaften, Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany, Vol. 2, Part 4 (in German).
16.
Melan, J. (1913). Theory of arches and suspension bridges, D. B. Steinman, translator, Myron C. Clark), Chicago, Ill.
17.
Modjeski, R., and Masters (1941). “Suspension bridges and wind resistance.” Engrg. News‐Record, 127(October 23, 1941).
18.
Moisseiff, L. (1925). “The towers, cables and stiffening trusses of the bridge over the Delaware River between Philadelphia and Camden.” J. Franklin Inst., 200(4).
19.
Moisseiff, L., and Lienhard, F. (1933). “Suspension bridges under the action of lateral forces.” Trans., ASCE, Vol. 98.
20.
Navier, C. L. M. H. (1823). Rapport à Monsieur Becquey, conseiller d'état, directeur général des ponts et chausées et des mines; et mémoire sur les ponts suspendus. Imprimérie Royal, Paris, France, 80–81 (in French).
21.
“The Niagara arch bridge swung.” (1898). The Engrg. Record, 37(No. 21, April 23).
22.
“The old and new suspension bridges over the Niagara River at Lewiston, N.Y.” (1899). Engrg. News, 41(No. 2, January 12).
23.
Provis, W. A. (1841). “Observations on the effect of wind on the suspension bridge over the Menai Strait.” The Civ. Engrg. and Architect's J., 4(45).
24.
Pugsley, S. A. (1968). The theory of suspension bridges. Edward Arnold, London, England.
25.
Rankine, W. J. M. (1869). A manual of applied mechanics, 5th Ed., Charles Griffin and Co., London, England.
26.
Raymond, C. W., Bixby, W. H., and Burr, E. (1894). Report of the Board of Engineer Officers as to maximum span practicable for suspension bridges. U.S. Government, Washington, D.C.
27.
Ritter, W. (1883). “Statische Berechnung der Versteifungsfachwerke der Hängebrücken.” Schweizerische Bauzeitung, Vol. 1(Nos. 1–6).
28.
Ritter, W. (1877). “Versteifungsfachwerke bei Bogen‐ und Hängebrücken,” Zeitschrift für Bauwesen, 27(4).
29.
Roebling, J. A. (1846). “Report and plan for a wire suspension bridge.” Order of Reference.
30.
Roebling, J. A. (1855). Final report on the Niagara Railway suspension bridge. Lee, Mann & Co., Rochester, N.Y.
31.
Schodek, D. (1987). Landmarks in American civil engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
32.
“Stability of the Menai suspension bridge.” (1837). J. Franklin Inst., 19(2nd series).
33.
“The statics of bridges—the suspension chain.” (1863a). The Civ. Engr. and Architect's J., Vol. 25, 47–50, 70–71, 171–173, 236–237.
34.
“The statics of bridges—the suspension chain.” (1863b). The Civ. Engr. and Architect's J., Vol. 26, 128–130.
35.
Steinman, D. (1913). Suspension Bridges and Cantilevers; Science Series, No. 127, Van Nostrand, New York, N.Y.
36.
Steinman, D. B. (1929). A practical treatise on suspension bridges. 2nd Ed., John Wiley, New York, N.Y.
37.
Stuart, C. B. (1871). Lives and works of civil and military engineers of America. Van Nostrand, New York, N.Y.
38.
“Suspension bridges. (1850). J. Franklin Inst., 19(3rd series).
39.
Turneaure, F. E. (1909). “Derivation of Formulas Used in the Calculation of Stresses in the Stiffening Truss,” Manhattan Bridge—Rep., Appendix B, City of New York Department of Bridges, New York, N.Y.
40.
van Kármán and Biot, M. A. (1940). Mathematical methods in engineering, 5th Ed., McGraw‐Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
41.
Wickersham, S. M. (1883). “The Monongahela Suspension Bridge at Pittsburgh, Pa.” Sci. Am. Supplement, 15(No. 389; June 16, 1883).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 3 • March 1993
Pages: 954 - 977
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 7, 1992
Published online: Mar 1, 1993
Published in print: Mar 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.