Seismic Design and Performance of Composite Coupled Walls
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 11
Abstract
The cyclic response of steel coupling beams embedded into reinforced concrete boundary elements was studied. Three half‐scale subassemblies representing a portion of a prototype structure were designed, constructed, and tested. The main test variables were the amount of vertical tension/compression stresses in the boundary element, and presence of auxiliary bars attached to the beam flanges for a smoother transfer of bearing stresses. The steel coupling beams exhibited very stable hysteresis characteristics, and could develop the theoretical plastic moment when the boundary and, hence, the connection region were subjected to normal compressive stresses. Tensile stresses in the boundary element reduced the stiffness, and smaller moments could be developed. A significant amount of dissipated energy could be accounted by that energy dissipated in “plastic hinges” formed in the exposed portion of the coupling beam. The stiffness was found to be different depending on whether the boundary element was under compressive or tensile normal stresses. The initial stiffness of the coupling beams in all the specimens was smaller than the value computed assuming full fixity at the face of the wall. The “effective fixed point” of the coupling beam was found to be inside the wall at approximately one‐third of the embedment length from the face of the wall. Analysis and design of composite coupled walls should account for the actual location at which the coupling beams are fixed in the walls.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aktan, A. E., and Bertero, V. V. (1987). “Evaluation of seismic response of RC building loaded to failure.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(5), 1092–1108.
2.
Azizinamini, A. et al. (1992). “New steel beam to composite column connection detail.” Composite construction in steel and concrete, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
3.
“Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318‐89/318‐R89).” (1989). ACI Committee 318, Am. Concrete Inst., Detroit, Mich.
4.
Mattock, A. H., and Gaafar, G. H. (1982). “Strength of embedded steel sections as brackets.” ACI J., 79(2), 83–93.
5.
Minami, K. (1985). “Beam to column stress transfer in composite structures.” Composite and mixed construction, C. Roeder, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
6.
Park, R., Priestly, M. J. N., and Grill, W. D. (1982). “Ductility of square confined concrete columns.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(4), 929–950.
7.
PCI design handbook—precast and prestressed concrete. (1985). Prestressed Concrete Inst., Chicago, Ill.
8.
Remmetter, M. E., Qin, F., Shahrooz, B. M. (1992). “Seismic resistance of composite coupled structural walls.” Report no. UC‐CII 92/01, Cincinnati Infrastructure Inst., Univ. of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
9.
Uniform building code. (1988). Int. Conf. Build. Off., Whittier, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 30, 1992
Published online: Nov 1, 1993
Published in print: Nov 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.