Design of Bridge Pier Pile Foundations for Ship Impact
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 8
Abstract
Procedures to assess the equivalent static force acting on a bridge pier due to a vessel impact and various pier protective systems are briefly discussed. Equations and closed‐form expressions are developed to obtain transverse and longitudinal components of ship impact, redistributed between pier and superstructure according to their relative stiffnesses. Plumb‐ and batter‐pile combinations are compared. The necessity of investigating batter‐pile combinations in several iteration cycles is stressed. Zero forces in “pulled‐out” piles are assumed in each next consecutive iteration cycle until either stability or failure is reached. Battered piles increase axial forces but decrease bending moments. This reduction in flexure is important because it reduces significantly the required number of prestressing strands in the pile. As an illustration, a comparative plumb and batter pile foundation design of the channel pier of Howard Frankland bridge, in Florida, is given.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Interim proposal for ship impacts. (1988). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
2.
Davisson, M. T., and Robinson, K. E. (1965). “Bending and buckling of partially embedded piles.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Engrg., Vol. 2, Montreal, Canada, 243–246.
3.
Davisson, M. T. (1970). “Lateral load capacity of piles.” Highway Res. Record No. 333, 104–112.
4.
Denver, H. (1983). “Geotechnical model tests for the design of protective islands.” (IABSE) Colloquium; Preliminary Report, Copenhagen, Denmark, 353–360.
5.
Derucher, K. H., and Heins, C. P. (1978). Bridge and pier protective systems and devices. M. Decker, New York, N.Y.
6.
Heins, C. P. (1983). “Bridge dolphins subjected to impact.” IABSE Colloquium; Preliminary Report, Copenhagen, Denmark, 281–287.
7.
Jiang, C. W., and Janova, R. C. (1983). “Analytical technique for ship fender interaction.” IABSE Colloquium; Preliminary Report, Copenhagen, Denmark, 195–302.
8.
Criteria for the design of bridge piers with respect to vessel collision in Louisiana waterways. (1985). Louisiana Dept. of Transp., Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
9.
Namita, Y., and Nakamishi, H. (1983). “Analysis of framed buffer structure around bridge pier.” IABSE Colloqium; Preliminary Report, Copenhagen, Denmark, 319—326.
10.
Olnhausen, W. (1983). “Ship collisions with bridges in Sweden.” IABSE Colloquium; Preliminary Report, Copenhagen, Denmark.
11.
Reese, L. C. (1984). Handbook on design of piles and drilled shafts under lateral load; FHWA‐IP‐84‐11. Federal Highways Administration, Washington, D.C.
12.
Saul, R., and Svensson, H. (1981). “Zum Schutz von Brückenpfeilern gegen Schiff‐sanprall, dargestellt am Beispiel der Brücken Zarate‐Brazo Largo über den Parana (Argentina)” (in German). Die Bautechnik, 58(10), 326–335, 374–388.
13.
Saul, R., and Svensson, H. (1982). “On the theory of ship collision against bridge piers.” IABSE Proc. P‐51/82, 29–40.
14.
Siva Reddy, A., and Valsangakar, A. J., (1970). “Buckling of fully and partially embedded piles.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 96(6), 1951–1965.
15.
Structures design guide lines. (1987). Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Fla.
16.
Woisin, G., and Gerlach, W. (1970). “On the estimation of forces developed in collisions between ships and off‐shore lighthouses.” 8th Int. Conf. on Lighthouses and Other Aids in Navigation, Stockholm, Sweden.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1992
Published in print: Aug 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.