Seismic‐Energy Dissipation in MDOF Structures
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 5
Abstract
The seismic input energy imparted to a structure is dissipated by hysteretic behavior and other nonyielding mechanisms usually represented by equivalent viscous damping. It is generally recognized that there is a strong correlation between the energy dissipated by hysteretic action and the seismically induced level of damage. While viscous damping has a small effect on the amount of energy imparted to a structure, it has a significant influence on the amount of hysteretic energy dissipation. A parametric study is presented on the influence of the mathematical modeling of viscous damping on seismic‐energy dissipation of multidegree‐of‐freedom (MDOF) structures. The damping is modeled using mass‐proportional, stiffness‐proportional, and Rayleigh damping computed from either the initial elastic or the tangent inelastic system properties. Various structural performance indices are evaluated for bilinear hysteresis model of simple MDOF structures with different strength levels, strain hardening ratios, and damping ratios.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bathe, K.‐J., and Gracewski, S. (1981). “On nonlinear dynamic analysis using sub‐structuring and mode superposition.” Computers and Struct., 13(5–6), 699–707.
2.
Conte, J. P., Pister, K. S., and Mahin, S. A. (1990). “Influence of the earthquake ground motion process and structural properties on response characteristics of simple structures.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐90/09, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
3.
El‐Aidi, B., and Hall, J. F. (1989). “Nonlinear earthquake response of concrete gravity dams. Part 1: Modeling.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 18(6), 837–851.
4.
Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M. (1990). “Earthquake design spectra considering duration of ground motion.” Proc. 4th U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2, 15–24.
5.
Fajfar, P., Vidic, T., and Fischinger, M. (1990). “A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium‐period structures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engrg., 9(5), 236–242.
6.
Filiatrault, A. (1990). “Static and dynamic analysis of timber shear walls.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 17(4), 643–651.
7.
Gillies, A. G., and Shepherd, R. (1983). “Prediction of post‐elastic seismic response of structures by a mode superposition technique.” Bull. New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Engrg., 16(3), 222–233.
8.
Hadidi‐Tamjed, H. (1988). “Statistical response of inelastic SDOF systems subjected to earthquakes,” PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
9.
Housner, G. W., and Jennings, P. C. (1977). “The capacity of extreme earthquake motions to damage structures.” Structural and geotechnical mechanics, W. J. Hall, ed. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 102–116.
10.
Idelsohn, S. R., and Cardona, A. (1985). “A load‐dependent basis for reduced nonlinear structural dynamics.” Computers and Struct., 20(1–3), 203–210.
11.
Kanaan, A. E., and Powell, G. H. (1973). “DRAIN‐2D a general purpose computer program for dynamic analysis of inelastic plane structures.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐73/6 and 73/22, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
12.
Kuwamura, H., and Galambos, T. V. (1989). “Earthquake load for structural reliability.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(6), 1446–1462.
13.
McCabe, S. L., and Hall, W. J. (1989). “Assessment of seismic structural damage.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(9), 2166–2183.
14.
National Building Code of Canada. (1990). Assoc. Committee on the Nat. Building Code, Nat. Res. Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
15.
Nickell, R. E. (1976). “Nonlinear dynamics by mode superposition.” Computer Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg., 7(1), 107–129.
16.
Otani, S. (1980). “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete building structures.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 7(2), 333–344.
17.
Pall, A. S., and Marsh, C. (1982). “Response of friction damped braced frames.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(6), 1313–1323.
18.
Schiff, S. D. (1988). “Seismic design studies of low‐rise steel frames,” PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
19.
Schiff, S. D., Hall, W. D., and Foutch, D. A. (1991). “Seismic performance of low‐rise steel perimeter frames.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(2), 546–562.
20.
Sedarat, H., and Bertero, V. V. (1990). “Effects of torsion on the linear and nonlinear seismic response of structures.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐90/12, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
21.
Takayanagi, T., and Schnobrich, W. C. (1979). “Non‐linear analysis of coupled wall systems.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 7(1), 1–22.
22.
Tembulkar, J. M., and Nau, J. M. (1987). “Inelastic modeling and seismic energy dissipation.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(6), 1373–1377.
23.
Uang, C.‐M. (1991). “Establishing R (or ) and factors for building seismic provisions.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(1), 19–28.
24.
Uang, C.‐M., and Bertero, V. V. (1990). “Evaluation of seismic energy in structures.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 19(1), 77–90.
25.
Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Eischinger, M. (1991). “On the hysteretic to input energy ratio.” Proc. 6th Can. Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Canadian National Committee for Earthquake Engineering, 69–76.
26.
Wu, J., and Hanson, R. D. (1989). “Study of inelastic spectra with high damping.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(6), 1412–1431.
27.
Zahrah, T. F., and Hall, W. J. (1984). “Earthquake energy absorption in SDOF structures.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(8), 1757–1772.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1992
Published in print: May 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.