Effect of Contraction Joints on Earthquake Response of an Arch Dam
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 4
Abstract
The modeling and dynamic analysis of a concrete arch dam, the impounded water, and the foundation rock is an important step in the earthquake‐safety evaluation of the system. An analysis assuming the dam is a monolithic structure often shows large tensile stresses in the arch direction. Arch dams are generally constructed as cantilever monoliths, however, and the joints between the monoliths cannot develop the tensile stress predicted from a linear analysis. The joints are expected to open during an earthquake, releasing the arch stresses and redistributing forces. In this study, a nonlinear element is developed to model the opening and closing of contraction joints. The joint elements are combined with linear shell, solid, and fluid finite elements to model an arch dam system. The assumption that the monoliths are linear substructures significantly reduces the computation required to solve the nonlinear equations of motion. The earthquake analysis of a typical concrete arch dam shows the importance of contraction‐]joint opening and the release of arch tensile stresses.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Clough, R. W. (1980). “Nonlinear mechanisms in the seismic response of arch dams.” Proc., Int. Res. Conf., on Earthquake Engrg., Skopje, Yugoslavia.
2.
Clough, R. W., Raphael, J. M., and Mojtahedi, S. (1973). “ADAP: A computer program for static and dynamic analysis of arch dams.” Report No. UCB/EERC 73‐14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
3.
Clough, R. W., and Wilson, E. L. (1979). “Dynamic analysis of large structural systems with local nonlinearities.” Computer Methods in Appl. Mech. and Engrg., 17/18(I), 107–129.
4.
Dowling, M. J., and Hall, J. F. (1989). “Nonlinear seismic analysis of arch dams.” J. Engrg., Mech., ASCE, 115(4), 768–789.
5.
Fenves, G. L., Mojtahedi, S., and Reimer, R. B. (1989). “ADAP‐88: A computer program for nonlinear earthquake analysis of concrete arch dams.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐89/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
6.
Fok, K.‐L., and Chopra, A. K. (1987). “Water compressibility in earthquake response of arch dams.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(5), 958–975.
7.
Ghaboussi, J., Wilson, E. L., and Isenberg, J. (1973). “Finite element for rock joints and interfaces.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 99(10), 833–848.
8.
Ghaboussi, J., Wilson, E. L., and Taylor, R. L. (1971). “Isoparametric finite elements with incompatible deformation modes.” Office of Naval Research, Symp., University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
9.
Ghanaat, Y., and Clough, R. W. (1989). “EADAP: Enhanced arch dam analysis program.” Report No. VCB/EERC‐89/07, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
10.
Goodman, R. E., Taylor, R. L., and Brekke, T. L. (1968). “A model for the mechanisms of jointed rock.” J. Soil Mech. Div., ASCE, 94(3), 637–659.
11.
Hohberg, J.‐M., and Bachman, H. (1988). “A macro joint element for nonlinear arch dam analysis.” Numerical Methods in Geomechanics Inssbruck 1988; Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Geomechan., G. Swoboda, ed., Innsbruck, Austria, 829–834.
12.
Hughes, T. J. R. (1987). The finite element method: Linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
13.
Kuo, J. (1982a). “Fluid‐structure interactions: Added mass computations for incompressible fluid.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐82/09, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
14.
Kuo, J. (1982b). “Joint opening nonlinear mechanism: Interface smeared crack model.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐82/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
15.
Lindvall and Richter Assoc. (1975). “Investigation and re‐analysis of the Big Tujunga Dam.” Final Report, Parts I to III, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
16.
Niwa, A., and Clough, R. W. (1980). “Shaking table research on concrete dam models.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐80/05, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
17.
Pawsey, S. F. (1970). “The analysis of moderately thick to thin shells by the finite element method.” Report No. UC/SESM‐70/12, Structural Engineering Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
18.
Row, D., and Schricker, V. (1984). “Seismic analysis of structures with localized nonlinearities.” 8th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Vol. IV, San Francisco, Calif., 475–482.
19.
Sharma, H. D., Nayak, G. C., and Maheshwari, J. B. (1976). “Generalization of sequential nonlinear analysis: A study of rockfill dam with joint elements.” 2nd Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Geomech., C. S. Dasai, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 662–685.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 4 • April 1992
Pages: 1039 - 1055
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1992
Published in print: Apr 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.