TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 1992

Analysis of Welded Tubular Connections Using Continuum Damage Mechanics

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 3

Abstract

A new modeling technique for the ultimate strength analysis of welded tubular connections subjected to general loading is presented. Based upon the finite element method, the model includes shell and solid elements, large deformations, and elastoplasticity. Unlike other approaches, the ability to simulate the initiation and propagation of fracture is included through the application of continuum damage mechanics (CDM). With this method, cracking is predicted on the basis of a damage variable, and its effect is applied as a reduction in the element stiffness. The development of the material constants is described and numerical results are obtained for two tubular joints that exhibit fracture failure. A comparison between the computed failure loads and those observed experimentally shows a close correlation. With this approach, welded connections that are subjected to arbitrary loading can be efficiently evaluated for strength.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Aaghaakouchak, A. A., and Dharmavasan, S. (1990). “Stress analysis of unstiffened and stiffened tubular joints using an improved finite element model of intersection.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. III, M. M. Salama, H. C. Rhee, J. G. Williams, and S. Liu, eds. American Society of Mech. Engrs. (ASME), New York, N.Y. 321–328.
2.
Ahmad, S., Irons, B. M., and Zienkiewicz, O. C. (1970). “Analysis of thick and thin shell structures by curved finite elements.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 2, 419–451.
3.
Baba, S., Ninomiya, K., Kajita, T., and Wakamura, M. (1984). “Numerical evaluation of stiffening effect of tubular joints.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 316–327.
4.
Bathe, K. J., and Dvorkin, E. N. (1986). “A formulation of general shell elements—The use of mixed interpolation of tensorial components.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 22, 697–722.
5.
Bazant, Z. P. (1986). “Mechanics of Distributed Cracking.” Appl. Mech. Rev., 39(5), 675–705.
6.
Bazant, Z. P. (1990), “Recent advances in failure localization and nonlocal models.” Micromechanics of failure of quasi‐brittle materials, S. P. Shah, S. E. Swartz, and M. L. Wang, eds., Elsevier, London, United Kingdom, 12–32.
7.
Bazant, Z. P., and Lin, F. B. (1988). “Nonlocal smeared cracking model for concrete fracture.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(11), 2493–2510.
8.
Bazant, Z. P., and Mazars, J. (1990). “France‐U.S. workshop on strain localization and size effect due to cracking and damage.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(6), 1412–1424.
9.
Bazant, Z. P., and Pijaudier‐Cabot, G. (1988). “Nonlocal continuum damage, localization instability and convergence.” J. Appl. Mech. ASME, 55, 287–293.
10.
Beale, L. A., and Toprac, A. A. (1967). “Analysis of in‐plane T, Y, and K welded tubular connections.” Bull. 125, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
11.
Billington, C. J., Lalani, M., and Tebbett, I. E. (1984). “Background to new formulas for the ultimate limit state of tubular joints.” J. Pet. Tech., 36(1), 147–156.
12.
Bodner, S. R., and Chan, K. S., (1986). “Modeling of continuum damage for application in elasto‐viscoplastic constitutive equations.” Engrg. Fract. Mech. 25 (5/6), 705–712.
13.
Chaboche, J. L. (1988a). “Continuum damage mechanics: Part I—General concepts.” J. Appl. Mech. ASME, 55, 55–64.
14.
Chaboche, J. L. (1988b). “Continuum damage mechanics: Part II—Damage growth, crack initation, and crack growth.” J. Appl. Mech., ASME, 55, 65–74.
15.
Chow, C. L., and Wang, I. (1987a). “An anisotropic theory of continuum damage mechanics for ductile fracture.” Engrg. Fract. Mech., 27(5), 547–558.
16.
Chow, C. L., and Wang, J. (1987b). “An anisotropic theory of elasticity for continuum damage mechanics.” Int. J. Fract., 33, 3–16.
17.
Chow, C. L., and Wang, J. (1988). “A finite element analysis of continuum damage mechanics for ductile fracture.” Int. J. Fract, 38, 83–102.
18.
Chow, C. L., and Wang, J. (1989). “On crack initiation angle of mixed mode ductile fracture with continuum damage mechanics.” Engrg. Fract. Mech., 32(4), 601–612.
19.
Cofer, W. F. (1988). “An analytical determination of ultimate strength of tubular joints for offshore structures.” thesis presented to Georgia Inst. of Tech., at Atlanta, Ga., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
20.
Cofer, W. F., and Will, K. M. (1990). “An analytical method for ultimate strength evaluation of tubular joints.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. III, M. M. Salama, H. C. Rhee, J. G. Williams, and S. Liu, eds., American Society of Mech. Engrgs. (ASME), New York, N.Y., 299–306.
21.
Cofer, W. F., and Will, K. M. (1991a). “A finite element technique for the ultimate strength analysis of tubular joints.” Engrg. Comput.
22.
Cofer, W. F., and Will, K. M., (1991b). “A three‐dimensional, shell‐solid transition element for general nonlinear analysis.” Comput. Struct., 38(4), 449–462.
23.
Crisfield, M. A. (1984). “Accelerating and damping the modified Newton Raphson method.” Comput. Struct., 18, 395–407.
24.
Curran, D. R., Seaman, L., and Dein, J. (1984). “Constitutive laws for failing materials.” Mechanics of engineering materials, C. S. Desai and R. H. Gallagher, eds., John Wiley and Sons, 139–152.
25.
Dvorkin, E. N., Cuitino, A. M., and Gioia, G. (1990). “Finite elements with displacement interpolated embedded localization lines insensitive to mesh size and distortions.” Int. I. Numer. Methods Engrg., 30, 541–564.
26.
Ebecken, N. F. F., Lima, E. C. P., Landau, L., and Benjamin, A. C. (1987). “Computational techniques for the elastic‐plastic analysis of tubular joints.” Engrg. Comput., 4, 126–130.
27.
Ebecken, N. F. F., Lima, E. C. P., Landau, L., and Chueiri, H. M. (1984). “Analysis of the static strength of tubular joints.” Numerical methods for nonlinear problems, C. Taylor, E. Hinton, and D. R. J. Owen, eds., Pineridge Press, 421–431.
28.
Greste, O. (1970). “Finite element analysis of tubular K‐joints.” Struct. Engrg. Res. Lab. Report 70‐11, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
29.
Huang, H. C., and Hinton, E. (1986). “A new nine node degenerated shell element with enhanced membrane and shear interpolation.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 22, 73–92.
30.
Irving, D. J. (1982). “Large deformation elasto‐plastic finite element analysis of plates, shells, and tubular joints using semiloof shell elements,” thesis presented to Kingston Polytech., at Kingston‐upon‐Thames, Surrey, U.K., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
31.
Jubran, J. S. (1990). “Continuum damage mechanics applied to the fracture analysis of tubular joints,” thesis presented to Washington State Univ., at Pullman, Wash., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
32.
Jubran, J. S., and Cofer, W. F. (1991). “The ultimate strength analysis of structural components using the continuum damage mechanics approach.” Comput. Struct., 39(6), 741–752.
33.
Krajcinovic, D. (1983). “Constitutive equations for damaging materials.” J. Appl. Mech. ASME, 50(2), 355–360.
34.
Krajcinovic, D. (1984). “Continuum damage mechanics.” Appl. Mech. Rev., 37(1), 1–5.
35.
Krajcinovic, D. (1989). “Damage mechanics.” Mech. Mater., 8, 117–197.
36.
Kurobane, Y., Makino, Y., and Ochi, K. (1984). “Ultimate resistance of unstiffened tubular joints.” J. Struct. Engrg., 110(2), 385–400.
37.
Lalani, M., Gholkar, S., and Ward, J. K. (1989). “Recent developments in the ultimate strength assessment of tubular joints: A nonlinear numerical treatment.” Proc., Offshore Technology Conf.
38.
Lemaitre, J. (1984). “How to use damage mechanics.” Nucl. Engrg. Des., 80, 233–245.
39.
Lemaitre, J. (1985). “A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture.” J. Engrg. Mater. Tech, 107, 83–90.
40.
Lemaitre, J. (1986). “Local approach to fracture.” Engrg. Fract. Mech., 25(5/6), 523–537.
41.
Murakami, S. (1988). “Mechanical modeling of material damage.” J. Appl. Mech., ASME, 55, 280–286.
42.
Owen, D. R. J., and Hinton, E. (1980). Finite elements in plasticity: Theory and practice, Pineridge Press Limited, Swansea, U.K.
43.
Pan, R. B., Plummer, F. B., and Kuang, J. G. (1977). “Ultimate strength of tubular joints.” J. Pet. Tech., 29(4), 449–460.
44.
Pijaudier‐Cabot, G., and Bazant, Z. P. (1987). “Nonlocal damage theory.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 113(10), 1512–1533.
45.
Rots, J. G., Nauta, P., Kusters, G. M., and Blaauwendraad, J. (1985). “Smeared crack approach and fracture localization in concrete.” Heron, 30(1), 1–48.
46.
Sanders, D. H., and Yura, J. A. (1986). “Strength and behavior of double‐tee tubular joints in tension.” PMFSEL Report 86‐2, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
47.
Simo, J. C., and Ju, J. W., (1987a). “Strain‐ and stress‐based continuum damage models I. Formulation.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 23(7), 821–840.
48.
Simo, J. C., and Ju, J. W., (1987b). “Strain‐ and stress‐based continuum damage models II. Computational aspects.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 23(7), 841–869.
49.
Stamenkovic, A., and Sparrow, K. D. (1983). “Load interaction in T‐joints of steel circular hollow sections.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 109(9), 2192–2204.
50.
Stevens, N. J., and Kitipornchai, S. (1990). “Limit analysis of welded tee end connections for hollow tubes.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(9), 2309–2323.
51.
Uduma, K., Olowokere, O. D., and Arciszewski, T. (1989). “Survey of existing studies on the strength and deformation of spherical joints in steel space trusses.” Engrg. J. Am. Inst. Steel Constr., Third Quarter, 102–109.
52.
Wang, J., and Chow, C. L. (1989). “Mixed mode ductile fracture studies with non‐proportional loading based on continuum damage mechanics.” Trans. ASME, 111, 204–209.
53.
Weitsman, Y. (1988). “A continuum damage model for viscoelastic materials.” J. Appl. Mech., ASME, 55, 773–780.
54.
Yura, J. A., Zettlemoyer, N., and Edwards, I. F. (1980). “Ultimate capacity equations for tubular joints.” Proc., Offshore Tech. Conf.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118Issue 3March 1992
Pages: 828 - 845

History

Published online: Mar 1, 1992
Published in print: Mar 1992

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

William F. Cofer, Associate Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164‐2910
Jihad S. Jubran
Grad. Res. Asst., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share