Pseudodynamic Test Method—Current Status and Future Directions
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 8
Abstract
A major concern in seismic performance testing is whether the loading conditions imposed on a test specimen are representative of those that might occur during an actual earthquake. An on‐line computer‐controlled experimental procedure has been recently developed that appears to combine the simplicity of quasistatic testing with the realism of shaking table tests. The basis of this so called pseudodynamic test method is summarized in this paper. Recent research results are examined to identify the method's capabilities and limitations. Efforts to extend the applicability of the method are highlighted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aktan, H. M. (1986). “Pseudodynamic testing of structures.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 112(2).
2.
Balendra, T., Lam, K.‐Y., Liaw, C.‐Y., and Lee, S.‐L. (1987). “Behavior of eccentrically braced frame by pseudodynamic test.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(4).
3.
Beck, J., and Jayakumar, P. (1986). “System identification applied to pseudodynamic test data: A treatment of experimental errors.” Proc., ASCE/EMD Specialty Conference on Dynamic Response of Structures, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Calif.
4.
Dermitzakis, S., and Mahin, S. (1985). “Development of substructuring techniques for on‐line computer controlled seismic performance testing.” UBC/EERC‐85/04, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
5.
Foutch, D. A., Goel, S. C., and Roeder, C. W. (1987). “Seismic testing of fullscale steel building—part I.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(11).
6.
Hanson, R., and McClamrock, N. (1984). “Pseudodynamic test method for inelastic building response.” Proc., 8WCEE, San Francisco, Calif.
7.
Hughes, T., and Liu, W. (1978). “Implicit‐explicit finite elements in transient analysis: Stability theory.” J. ASME, 45.
8.
Mahin, S. A., and Shing, P. B. (1985). “Pseudodynamic methods for seismic testing.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(7).
9.
Mahin, S., et al. (1985). “Extension of pseudodynamic methods for seismic performance evaluation.” Proc., Joint Tech. Meeting, U.S.‐Japan Cooperative Earthquake Res. Program, Maui, Hawaii.
10.
McClamrock, N. H., Serakos, J., and Hanson, R. D. (1981). “Design and analysis of the pseudodynamic test method.” Report UMEE 81R3, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
11.
Roeder, C. W., Foutch, D. A., and Goel, S. C. (1987). “Seismic testing of fullscale steel building—part II.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(11).
12.
Scholl, R. ed. (1984). “Experimental research needs for improving earthquake resistant design of buildings.” Workshop Proc., EERI.
13.
Shing, P. B., and Mahin, S. (1983). “Experimental error propagation in pseudodynamic testing.” UBC/EERC‐83/12, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
14.
Shing, P. B., Dermitzakis, S., and Mahin, S. (1984). “Evaluation of seismic behavior of a braced tubular steel structure by pseudodynamic testing.” J. Energy Resour. Tech. Trans., ASME, 106.
15.
Shing, P. B., and Mahin, S. (1984). “Pseudodynamic method for seismic performance testing: Theory and implementation.” UBC/EERC‐84/01, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
16.
Shing, P. B., and Mahin, S. A. (1985). “Computational aspects of a seismic performance test method using on‐line computer control.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 13.
17.
Shing, P. B., and Mahin, S. A. (1987). “Cumulative experimental errors in pseudodynamic tests.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 15(4), 409–424.
18.
Shing, P. B., and Mahin, S. (1987). “Elimination of spurious higher mode response in pseudodynamic tests.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 15(4), 425–445.
19.
Shing, P. B., and Mahin, S. A. (1988). “Rate of loading effects on pseudodynamic tests.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(11).
20.
Takanashi, K., et al. (1975). “Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer‐actuator on‐line system.” Trans., Architectural Institute of Japan, 229, 77–83.
21.
Takanashi, K., and Nakashima, M. (1986). “A state of the art: Japanese activities on on‐line computer test control methods.” J. Inst. of Industrial Sci., Tokyo, Japan, 32(3).
22.
Takanashi, K., and Nakashima, M. (1987). “Japanese activities on on‐line testing.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 113(7).
23.
Thewalt, C., Mahin, S., and Dermitzakis, S. (1986). “Advanced on‐line computer control methods for seismic performance testing.” Proc., U.S. Nat. Conference on Earthquake Engrg., Raleigh, S.C.
24.
Thewalt, C. R., and Mahin, S. A. (1987). “Hybrid solution techniques for generalized pseudodynamic testing.” UBC/EERC‐87/09, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 115 • Issue 8 • August 1989
Pages: 2113 - 2128
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1989
Published in print: Aug 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.