Application of Dempster‐Shafer Theory for Interpretation of Seismic Parameters
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 9
Abstract
Seismic design parameters are inherently imprecise and fuzzy. Formal models of inexact inferences are therefore highly relevant to the interpretation of such inexactly described seismic parameters. Application of such techniques becomes even more relevant if it is envisaged that, in the future, provisions for seismic design may be more effectively represented by encoding them as fuzzy expert systems. The linguistic representation of imprecise variables is presented. More importantly, how an evidence‐based scheme, the Dempster‐Shafer theory of evidence, can be used to infer conclusions about imprecisely stated problems is demonstrated. A set of seismic parameters, namely the seismic performance category (SPC), the seismic hazard exposure (SHE), and the seismic intensity (SI), are selected from a seismic design code. How the relationship between the three parameters can be “softened” is demonstrated using a linguistic representation; such a representation involves setting up conditional IF … THEN types of rules describing how different states of rule‐antecedents, SI and SHE, will lead to different states of a rule‐consequent, SPC. A frame of discernment (θ) is then defined which comprises several hypotheses about SPC. Thereafter evidence about SI and SHE is used to infer conclusions about SPC. The conclusions are represented by a combined degree of belief and plausibility in the hypotheses in θ.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alim, S. (1985). “Fuzzy expert systems in civil engineering,” thesis presented to the University of London, England, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
2.
Baldwin, J. F., and Pilsworth, B. W. (1979). “A model of fuzzy reasoning through multi‐valued logic and set theory.” Int. J. Man‐Machine Studies, 11, 351–380.
3.
Dempster, A. (1963). “On direct probabilities.” J. Royal Stat. Soc., Series B 25, 102–107.
4.
Dempster, A. (1968). “A generalization of Bayesian inference.” J. Royal Stat. Soc., Series B 30, 205–247.
5.
Dubois, D., and Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
6.
Edward, W. (1954). “The theory of decision‐making.” Psych. Bull., 51(4).
7.
Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.
8.
Shortliffe, E. H. (1976). Computer‐based medical consultations: MYCIN. Elsevier, N.Y.
9.
Soula, G., and Sanchez, E. (1982). “Soft deduction rules in medical diagnostic processes.” Approximate reasoning in decision analysis, Gupta, M. M., and Sanchez, E., eds., North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
10.
“Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings (ATC3‐06, 1978).” (1978). NBS publication 510 and NSF publication 78–8.
11.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
12.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). “Calculus of fuzzy restrictions.” Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes, Zadeh, L. A., ed., Academic Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 1–39.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1988
Published in print: Sep 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.