Generalized Finite Element Evaluation Procedure
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 2
Abstract
A rational procedure for evaluating the performance of two and three dimensional finite elements is developed. This procedure compares the strain energy content and the strain distribution of the finite element model to that of the continuum region it represents for well‐defined strain states. The use of Taylor series expansions which relate the displacements, rotations, and strains through strain gradient terms allows the strain energies and the pointwise strains of the finite element model and the continuum to be directly compared. The evaluation procedure is demonstrated by applying it to a six‐node isoparametric element undergoing a series of progressive initial distortions. From these results, a simple algorithm to predict the maximum strain energy error as a function of initial geometry is developed for incorporation into finite element codes at the grid generation level.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Clough, R. W., “Comparison of Three‐Dimensional Finite Elements,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Application of Finite Element Methods in Civil Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., Nov., 1969, pp. 1–26.
2.
Cook, R. D., “More About ‘Artificial’ Softening of Finite Elements,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 8, 1977, pp. 1334–1339.
3.
Dow, J. O., and Taugbol, S. E., “Highly Refined, Reusable Stress Concentration Finite Elements,” AIAA Journal, under review.
4.
Ebner, Alan M., “Guidelines for Finite Element Idealization,” presented at the ASCE National Structural Engineering Convention, New Orleans, La., Apr. 14–18, 1975.
5.
Gojo, J., Kelly, D. W., and Zienkiewicz, “Adaptive Finite Element Schemes and A‐Posteriori Error Analysis, An Evaluation of Alternatives,” New and Future Developments in Commercial Finite Element Methods, I. Robinson, ed., Robinson‐Ford and Assoc., 1981, pp. 512–528.
6.
Haggenmocker, G. W., and Lakey, R. S., “Diagnostics in Finite Element Analyses,” First Chatauqua on Finite Element Modeling, J. H. Conway, ed., Schaeffer Analysis, Inc., 1980, pp. 193–213.
7.
Khanna, J., “Criterion for Selecting Stiffness Matrices,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 3, No. 10, 1976, p. 1965.
8.
Khanna, J., and Hooley, R. F., “Comparison and Evaluation of Stiffness Matrices,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 4, No. 12, 1966, pp. 2105–2110.
9.
Melosh, R. J., “Development of the Stress Method to Define Bounds on Elastic Behavior of Structures,” thesis presented to the University of Washington, in June 1962, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
10.
Melosh, R. J., “Structural Analyses of Solids,” American Society of Civil Engineers, ST4, Vol. 89, 1963, pp. 205–223.
11.
“Review of the Third World Congress and Exhibition on Finite Element Methods,” Schaeffer Bulletin on Engineering and Design, No. 1, 1982, pp. 7 and 9.
12.
Rigby, G. L., and McNeice, G. M., “A Strain Energy Basis for Studies of Element Stiffness Matrices,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 10, No. 11, 1972, pp. 1490–1493.
13.
Robinson, J., and Blackham, S., “An Evaluation of Lower Order Membranes as Contained in the ANSYS and SAP4 FEM Systems,” Finite Element News, No. 2, Apr., 1981, pp. 27–29.
14.
Robinson, J., and Blackham, S., “An Evaluation of Plate Bending Elements in MSC/NASTRAN, ASAS, PAFEC, ANSYS and SAF4,” Robinson‐Ford Assoc., 1980, 180 pp.
15.
Wang, C. T., Applied Elasticity, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., 1953, p. 38.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1985
Published in print: Feb 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.