Practical Structural Reliability Techniques
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 110, Issue 8
Abstract
Commonly‐used structural reliability models are reviewed, and the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed with the help of a practical example. A pressure vessel is designed against wind loading. This example is selected because the limit state equation is nonlinear and the wind speed has an extremely skewed distribution. Although the First‐Order Second‐Moment may be sufficient in many problems, the risk involved may still be unknown, even in a relative sense, unless the limit state equation is linear and all the variables are normal. In that sense, the Advanced Second‐Moment method has several advantages. It yields probabilities of failure similar to the variance reduction techniques, at least for the pressure vessel example considered here. If simulation techniques are used to study a problem, some kind of variance reduction technique should be used for economic reasons. For the complicated example considered here, the Conditional Expectation plus Antithetic Variates variance reduction technique is found to be the most efficient. The Monte Carlo Simulation technique is modified to make the simulation more efficient.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Institute of Steel Construction Inc., “Manual of Steel Construction,” 8th ed., New York, N.Y., 1980.
2.
Ang, A. H‐S., “Structural Risk Analysis and Reliability Based Design,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. ST9, Paper 1011, Sept., 1973, pp. 1891–1910.
3.
Ang, A. H‐S., and Cornell, C. A., “Reliability Bases of Structural Safety and Design,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. ST9, Paper 10777, Sept., 1974, pp. 1755–1769.
4.
Ang, A. H‐S., and Tang, W. H., Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol. 1—Basic Principles, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., N.Y., 1975.
5.
ANSI A58.1‐1972, Building Code Requirements for Minimum Design Loads in Building and Other Structures, ANSI, New York, N.Y., 1972.
6.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII—Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 1, ASME, N.Y., 1974.
7.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII—Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 2—Alternative Rules, ASME, N.Y., 1974.
8.
Bendar, H., Pressure Vessel Design Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, N.Y., 1981.
9.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., Probability Statistics and Decisions for Civil Engineering, McGraw‐Hill, N.Y., 1970.
10.
Burt, J. M., Jr., and Garman, M. B., “Conditional Monte Carlo: A Simulation Technique for Stochastic Network Analysis,” Management Science, No. 18, 1971, pp. 207–217.
11.
Davenport, A. G., “The Dependence of Wind Loads Upon Meterological Parameters,” Proceedings, Wind Effect on Buildings and Structures, Ottawa, Vol. 1, Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 1968.
12.
Ellingwood, B., “Wind and Snow Load Statistics for Probabilistic Design,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. ST7, July, 1981, pp. 1345–1350.
13.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Ang, A. H‐S., “A Probability Study of Safety Criteria for Design,” Structural Research Series No. 387, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, June, 1972.
14.
Ellingwood, B. R., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, A. C., “Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58,” National Bureau of Standards, Special Publication No. 577.
15.
Fanous, F., and Greimann, L. F., “Reliability Assessment of Containment Resistance,” presented at the June 27–July 2, 1982, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Specialty Conference, held at Orlando, Fla.
16.
Fiessler, B., Neumann, H.‐J., and Rackwitz, R., “Quadratic Limit States in Structural Reliability,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 105, No. EM4, Paper 14739, Aug., 1979, pp. 661–676.
17.
“First Order Reliability Concepts for Design Codes,” Bulletin D'Information No. 112, Comite Europeen du Beton, Munich, July, 1976.
18.
Freundenthal, A. M., Garrelts, J. M., and Shinozuka, M., “The Analysis of Structural Safety,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. ST1, Paper 4682, Feb., 1966, pp. 267–325.
19.
Haldar, A., “Chapter 6—Statistical Methods,” Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, edited by J. B. Martins, NATO Advanced Study Institute Series, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston, 1981.
20.
Hasofer, A. M., and Lind, N. C., “Exact and Invariant Second‐Moment Code Format,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. EM1, Paper 10376, Feb., 1974, pp. 111–121.
21.
Ito, M., and Fujino, Y., “Design Wind Speed and Wind Load Factor Based on Probabilistic Rationale,” Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on Wind Engineering, Fort Collins, Colo., July, 1979.
22.
Kleijnen, J. P. C., Statistical Techniques in Simulation, Part 1, Dekker, N.Y., 1974.
23.
Law, A., and Kelton, W., Simulation, Modeling and Analysis, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., N.Y., 1982.
24.
Menta, K. C., “Wind Load Standards and Codes,” Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on Wind Engineering, Fort Collins, Colo., Vol. 2, July, 1979.
25.
Paloheimo, E., “Eine Bemessungsmethode, die sich aut variierende Fraktilen gründet,” Arbeitstagung des Deutschen Betonvereins Sicherheit von Betonbauten, Berlin, 1973.
26.
Peyrot, A. H., Criswell, M. E., Folse, M. D., and Aznavour, J. P., “Reliability Analysis of Wood Transmission Poles,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. ST9, Paper 17326, Sept., 1982, pp. 1981–1993.
27.
Rackwitz, R., and Fiessler, B., “Note on Discrete Safety Checking When Using Non‐normal Stochastic Models for Basic Variables,” Loads Project Working Session, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., June, 1976.
28.
Rackwitz, R., and Fiessler, B., “Structural Reliability Under Combined Random Load Sequences,” Computers and Structures, Vol. 9, 1978, pp. 489–494.
29.
Ravindra, M., Galambos, T. V., and Cornell, C. A., “Wind and Snow Load Factors for Use in LRFD,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. ST9, Paper 14006, Sept., 1978.
30.
Simiu, E., and Filliben, J. J., “Probability Distributions of Extreme Wind Speeds,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. ST9, Paper 12381, Sept., 1976, pp. 1861, 1877.
31.
Thoft‐Christensen, P., and Baker, M. J., Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications, Springer‐Verlag, N.Y., 1982, pp. 96–101.
32.
Thom, H. C. S., “New Distributions of Extreme Winds in the United States,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. ST7, Paper 6038, July, 1968, pp. 1787, 1801.
33.
Thorn, H. C. S., “Engineering Climatology in Design Winds with Special Reference to the Chicago Area,” Proceedings, Symposium and Wind Effects on High‐Rise Buildings, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill., Mar., 1970.
34.
Thom, H. C. S., “Distributions of Extreme Winds Over Oceans,” Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. WW1, Paper 9556, Feb., 1973.
35.
Vickery, B. J., “On the Reliability of Gust Loading Factors,” Proceedings, Technical Meeting Concerning Wind Loads on Buildings and Structures, Building Science Series 30, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., Nov., 1970.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1984
Published in print: Aug 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.