TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 15, 2010

Soil Moisture Measurements: Comparison of Instrumentation Performances

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 2

Abstract

It has long been recognized that reliable, robust, and automated instrumentation for the measurement of soil moisture content can be extremely useful, if not essential, in hydrological, environmental, and agricultural applications. A number of automated techniques for point measurement of soil water content have been developed to operational level over the past few decades. While each of those techniques has been individually calibrated by the gravimetric method, typically under laboratory conditions, there have been few studies that made a direct comparison between the various techniques, particularly under field conditions. This paper compares ECH2O probes, EC-5 (both sensors based on capacitance measurements, developed by Decagon Devices) and time domain reflectometer sensors (CS616 Campbell Scientific Water Content Reflectometer), with gravimetric data and with each other, under field conditions. Data were collected during two field experiments characterized by different soils and a wide range of soil moistures, resulting from irrigation/drying cycle. Results show that all the tested probes give acceptable results after being calibrated in the field. The capacitive sensors can be used in each type of soil with the same calibration equation, independently from depth, with root mean square error (RMSE) ranging between 2.5 and 3.6%. Time Domain Reflectometry probes showed a dependence on depth but a lower RMSE (1.6%).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MiUR), in the frame of the Project No. UNSPECIFIED2004070118_003, “Survey of energy and mass fluxes over vines and bare soil between rows in an Italian vineyard.” The writers warmly thank the “Tenuta Col d’Orcia” winery for hosting this research.

References

Benson, C. H., and Wang, X. (2006). “Temperature-compensating calibration procedure for water content reflectometers.” Proc., TDR 2006, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., 16, ⟨https://engineering.purdue.edu/TDR/Papers⟩ (Jan. 14, 2010).
Busoni, E. (1997). “Bulk density.” Metodi di analisi fisica del suolo, Part II, 1–9, ISO/DIS 11272, M. Pagliai, ed., Franco Angeli, Milan (in Italian).
Cahill, A. T., and Parlange, M. B. (1998). “On water vapour transport in field soils.” Water Resour. Res., 34, 731–739.
Campbell, C. S. (2006a). “Calibration equations for the ECH2O , EC-5 and ECH2O -TE sensors.” Application note nr. 13392-00, Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, Wash., 2.
Campbell, C. S. (2006b). “ ECH2O probe operator’s manual.” Application note, Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, Wash., 27.
Campbell, C. S. (2006c). “Response of the ECH2O EC-10 and EC-20 soil moisture probes to variation in water content, soil type and solution electrical conductivity.” Application Note nr. 13429-00, Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, Wash., 4.
Campbell, C. S. (2006d). “Response of the ECH2O soil moisture sensors to temperature variation.” Application note nr. 13394-00, Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, Wash., 6.
Campbell Scientific, Inc. (2006). CS616 and CS625 water content reflectometers, rev. 8/06, Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, Utah.
Cobos, D. R. (2006). “Calibrating ECH2O soil moisture sensors.” Application note, Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, Wash.
Czarnomski, N., Moore, G., Pypker, T., Licata, J., and Bond, B. (2005). “Precision and accuracy of three alternative instruments for measuring soil water content in two forest soils of the Pacific Northwest.” Can. J. For. Res., 35(8), 1867–1876.
Eller, H., and Denoth, A. (1996). “A capacitive soil moisture sensor.” J. Hydrol., 185, 137–146.
Jackson, R. D. (1973). “Diurnal changes in soil water content during drying, in field soil water regime.” Field soil water regime, R. R. Bruce, ed., SSSA Special Publication No. 5, Madison, 37–55.
Merlin, O., Walker, J. P., Panciera, R., Young, R., Kalma, J. D., and Kim, E. J. (2007). “Soil moisture measurement in heterogeneous terrain.” MODSIM 2007 Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation, L. Oxley and D. Kulasiri, eds., Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 2604–2610.
Or, D., and Wraith, J. M. (1999). “Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: A physical model.” Water Resour. Res., 35(2), 371–383.
Robinson, D. A., et al. (2008). “Soil moisture measurement for ecological and hydrological watershed-scale observatories: A review.” Vadose Zone J., 7, 358–389.
Santini, A. (1997). “Soil water content.” Metodi di analisi fisica del suolo, Part. VIII, 1, ISO/DIS 11461, M. Pagliai, ed., Franco Angeli, Milan (in Italian).
Seyfried, M. S., and Murdock, M. D. (2004). “Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 394–403.
Topp, G. C. (1987). “The application of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) to soil water content measurement.” Proc. of Int. Conf. on Measurement of Soil and Plant Water Status, R. J. Hanks, et al., ed., Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 85–93.
Topp, G. C., Davis, J. L., and Annan, A. P. (1980). “Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines.” Water Resour. Res., 16, 574–582.
Ventura, F., Faber, B., Bali, K., Snyder, R. L., Spano, D., Duce, P., and Schulbach, K. F. (2001). “A model for estimating evaporation and transpiration from row crops.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 127(6), 339–345.
Ventura, F., Rossi Pisa, P., and Ardizzoni, E. (2002). “Temperature and precipitation trends in Bologna (Italy) from 1952 to 1999.” Atmos. Res., 61, 203–214.
Ventura, F., Snyder, R. L., and Bali, K. M. (2006). “Estimating evaporation from bare soil using soil moisture data.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(2), 153–158.
Walker, J. P., Willgoose, G. R., and Kalma, J. D. (2004). “In situ measurements of soil moisture: A comparison of techniques.” J. Hydrol., 293, 85–99.
Wraith, J. M., and Or, D. (1999). “Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: Experimental evidence and hypothesis development.” Water Resour. Res., 35(2), 361–369.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 136Issue 2February 2010
Pages: 81 - 89

History

Received: May 27, 2008
Accepted: Jun 30, 2009
Published online: Jan 15, 2010
Published in print: Feb 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ventura Francesca [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Agroenvironmental Science and Technology, Univ. of Bologna, v. Fanin 44, 40137 Bologna, Italy (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Facini Osvaldo [email protected]
Researcher, National Research Council, Institute of Biometeorolgy, v. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Piana Stefano [email protected]
Technician, Dept. of Agroenvironmental Science and Technology, Univ. of Bologna, v. Fanin 44, 40137 Bologna, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Rossi Pisa Paola [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Agroenvironmental Science and Technology, Univ. of Bologna, v. Fanin 44, 40137 Bologna, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share