TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2007

Comparison of Priestley-Taylor and FAO-56 Penman-Monteith for Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation in Georgia

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 2

Abstract

The climate in Georgia and other southeastern states of the United States is considered to be humid and the annual precipitation is usually greater than the annual potential evapotranspiration (ET). However, during several months of the year, supplemental irrigation is needed to prevent yield reducing water stress due to the temporal rainfall variability and sometimes due to long-term droughts. The Priestley-Taylor (PT) equation has been used operationally in Georgia to compute ET for irrigation scheduling because of its simplicity, its general acceptable performance in humid regions, and its limited input requirements. A recent study for a site in the humid southeastern United States found that PT overestimated ET and was less accurate than the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PM) among some of the approaches that were evaluated. The objective of this study was to assess the potential improvement that can be achieved by replacing PT with FAO-56 PM in Georgia and other southeastern states in a humid climate. More than 70 weather stations across Georgia are available as part of the Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network. Nine representative sites, including Blairsville in a mountainous area and Savannah in a coastal area, were selected to assess the potential improvements that may be achieved by replacing PT with FAO-56 PM. Each site had at least 10 years of daily records that included minimum and maximum air temperature, solar radiation, wind speed, and vapor pressure deficit. PT underestimated the daily and monthly ET during the winter months in the central and southwestern areas and overestimated the daily and monthly ET during the summer months in the coastal and mountainous areas. For the warm season, i.e., April through September, PT slightly overestimated the cumulative ET in the central and southwestern areas, moderately for the mountainous area and severely for the coastal area. Based on these results, it is anticipated that the use of FAO-56 PM for estimating ET will standardize the ET calculations and improve irrigation efficiency in Georgia, especially for the mountainous and coastal areas.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by State and Federal funds allocated to Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Hatch Project No. GEO01654 and a special grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture-CSREES.

References

Alexandrov, V. A., and Hoogenboom, G. (1999). “Crop water use as a function of climate variability in Georgia.” Proc., Georgia Water Resources Conf., Institute of Ecology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, Ga., 425–428.
Alexandrov, V. A., and Hoogenboom, G. (2001). “Climate variation and crop production in Georgia, USA, during the twentieth century.” Clim. Res., 17(1), 33–43.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. A., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspiration.” FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome.
Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Pereira, L. S., and Perrier, A. (1994). “An update for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration.” ICID Bull., 43(2), 1–34.
Allen, R. G., Walter, I. A., Elliot, R., Howell, T., Itenfisu, D., and Jensen, M. (2005). “The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation.” Final Rep., National Irrigation Symp., ASCE-EWRI Task Committee, Phoenix ⟨http://www.kimberly.uidaho.edu/water/asceewri/ ⟩.
Amatya, D. M., Skaggs, R. W., and Gregory, J. D. (1995). “Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 121(6), 427–435.
Harrison, K. (2001). “Agricultural irrigation trends in Georgia.” Proc., Georgia Water Resources Conf., Institute of Ecology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, Ga., 114–117.
Hoogenboom, G. (2000a). “The Georgia automated environmental monitoring network 2000.” Preprints 24th Conf. on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 24–25.
Hoogenboom, G. (2000b). “Contribution of agrometeorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 103(1-2), 137–157.
Hoogenboom, G. (2001). “Weather monitoring for management of water resources.” Proc., Georgia Water Resources Conf., Institute of Ecology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, Ga., 778–781.
Hoogenboom, G., Coker, D. D., Edenfield, J. M., Evans, D. M., and Fang, C. (2003). “The Georgia automated environmental monitoring network: 10 years of weather information for water resources management.” Proc., Georgia Water Resources Conf., Institute of Ecology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, Ga., 896–900.
Hook, J. E. (1991). “Southeast weather trends and peanut yields in the past 20 years.” Proc., Peanut Quality Seminar, National Peanut Council Meeting, Tucson, Az.
Hook, J. E., Threadgill, E. D., and Lambert, J. R. (1984). “Corn irrigation scheduled by tensiometer and the lambert model in the humid southeast.” Agron. J., 76(4), 695–700.
Irmak, S., Allen, R. G., and Whitty, E. B. (2003). “Daily grass and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration estimates and alfalfa-to-grass evapotranspiration ratios in Florida.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(5), 360–370.
Itenfisu, D., Elliott, R. L., Allen, R. G., and Walter, I. A. (2003). “Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculations as part of the ASCE standardization effort.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(6), 440–448.
Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D., and Allen, R. G. (1990). “Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements.” ASCE Manuals and Rep. on Engineering Practice No. 70, New York.
Kim, C. P., and Entekhabi, D. (1997). “Examination of two methods for estimating regional evaporation using a coupled mixed layer and land surface model.” Water Resour. Res., 33(9), 2109–2116.
Legates, D. R., and McCabe, G. J. Jr. (1999). “Evaluating the use of “goodness of fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 233–241.
Liu, X. Y., and Lin, E. (2005). “Performance of the Priestley-Taylor equation in the semiarid climate of North China.” Agric. Water Manage., 71(1), 1–17.
McAneney, K. J., and Itier, B. (1996). “Operational limits to the Priestley-Taylor formula.” Irrig. Sci., 17(1), 37–43.
Mohan, S., and Arumugam, N. (1996). “Discussion of ‘Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET-Discussion’.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 122(6), 361–362.
Oliveira, C. W., and Yoder, R. E. (2000). “Evaluation of daily reference evapotranspiration estimation methods for a location in the southeastern USA.” ASAE Paper No. 002030, St. Joseph, Mich.
Pereira, A. R. (2004). “The Priestley-Taylor parameter and the decoupling factor for estimating reference evapotranspiration.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 125(3–4), 305–313.
Priestley, C. H. B., and Taylor, R. J. (1972). “On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters.” Mon. Weather Rev., 100(2), 81–92.
Utset, A., Farre, I., Martinez-Cob, A., and Cavero, J. (2004). “Comparing Penman-Monteith and Priestley-Taylor approaches as reference-evapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions.” Agric. Water Manage., 66(3), 205–19.
Willmott, C. J. (1982). “Some comments on the evaluation of model performance.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 63(11), 1309–1313.
Willmott, C. J. (1984). “On the evaluation of model performance in physical geography.” Spatial statistics and models, G. L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 443–460.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (1981). Guide to agricultural meteorological practices, 2nd Ed., Geneva, Switzerland, WMO 134.
Yoder, R. E., Odhiambo, L. O., and Wright, W. C. (2005a). “Effects of vapor-pressure deficit and net-irradiance calculation methods on accuracy of standardized Penman-Monteith equation in a humid climate.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(3), 228–237.
Yoder, R. E., Odhiambo, L. O., and Wright, W. C. (2005b). “Evaluation of methods for estimating daily reference crop evapotranspiration at a site in the humid Southeast United states.” Appl. Eng. Agric., 21(2), 197–202.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 133Issue 2April 2007
Pages: 175 - 182

History

Received: Sep 6, 2005
Accepted: Aug 3, 2006
Published online: Apr 1, 2007
Published in print: Apr 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ayman A. Suleiman
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Land, Water, and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Univ. of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Gerrit Hoogenboom
Professor, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223 (corresponding author).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share