Simultaneous Prediction of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Drainable Porosity Using the Inverse Problem Technique
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 2
Abstract
The saturated hydraulic conductivity and the effective porosity are two important input parameters needed for lateral drain spacing design, as well as some other applications. The technical and economic justification, of most drainage projects, is mainly connected to these two parameters. The current design procedure is based upon calculation of the lateral spacing, using some average values of and within the drainage area. The objectives of this study were to introduce a new method for simultaneous estimation of and parameters using the inverse problem technique, and to evaluate five different unsteady drainage analytical models of the Boussinesq equation, suggested by different researchers for simultaneous prediction of the parameters. Consequently, five different analytical models for predicting water table profiles were solved, using the inverse problem technique. Each model was then evaluated. A physical drainage model of length, width, and height was established in the laboratory and carefully packed with a sandy loam soil. A perforated drainage pipe of in diameter was installed at the bottom end of the model. Many piezometers were inserted in the soil for spatial and temporal water table monitoring. Different data sets from the experiments and literature were used for model calibration. The newly proposed approach that is based upon measuring water table profiles, at different times, was then evaluated with both constant and variable . The predicted values of the proposed approach indicated reasonable agreement with the measured data. With variable effective porosity, the method was even more accurate to predict the water table profiles. Using the inverse problem technique, all the analytical models provided good agreement with the measured data. Among these, however, the Topp and Moody model predicted more accurate results than other models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Amoozegar Fard, A., and Wilson, G. V. (1999). “Methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity and drainable porosity.” Agricultural drainage, agronomy monograph, No. 38, R. W. Skaggs and J. van Schilfgaarde, eds., ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, Chap. 37, pp. 1149–1205.
Box, M. J. (1966). “A comparison of several current optimization methods and use of transformation in constrained problems.” Comput. J., 9, 67–77.
Chauhan, H. S., Schwap, G. O., and Hamdy, M. Y. (1968). “Analytical and computer solutions of transient water tables for drainage of sloping lands.” Water Resour. Res., 4, 573–579.
Dumm, L. D. (1964). “Transient-flow concept in subsurface drainage: Its validity and use.” Trans. ASAE, 7, 142–151.
Homaee, M., Dirksen, C., and Feddes, R. A. (2002). “Simulation of root water uptake. I. Non-uniform transient salinity using different macroscopic reduction functions.” Agric. Water Manage., 57, 89–109.
Hopmans, J. W., and Simunek, J. (1999). “Review of inverse estimation of hydraulic properties.” Proc., International Workshop, Characterization, and Measurement of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Porous Media, M. Th. Van Genuchten, F. J. Leij, and L. Wu, eds., Univ. of California, Riverside, Calif., 713–724.
Jarvis, N. J., et al. (2002). “Indirect estimation of near-saturated hydraulic conductivity from readily available soil information.” Geoderma, 108, 1–17.
Kumar, S., Gupta, S. K., and Ram, S. (1991). “Inverse techniques for estimating transmissivity and drainable pore space utilizing data from subsurface drainage experiment.” Agric. Water Manage., 26, 41–58.
Moustafa, M. M. (2000). “A geostatistical approach to optimize the determination of saturated hydraulic conductivity for large-scale subsurface drainage design in Egypt.” Agric. Water Manage., 42, 291–312.
Pandey, R. S., Bhattacharya, A. K., Singh, O. P., and Gupta, S. K. (1992). “Drawdown solutions with variable drainage porosity.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 118(3), 382–396.
Ritter, A., Hupet, F., Carpena, R. M., Lambot, S., and Van Clooster, M. (2003). “Using inverse methods for estimating soil hydraulic properties from field data as an alternative to direct methods.” Agric. Water Manage., 59, 77–96.
Ritzema, H. P. (1994). Drainage principles and applications, ILRI Publication No. 16, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Schwab, G. O., Fangmeir, D. D., and Elliot, W. J. (1996). Soil and water management systems, Wiley, New York.
Sing, R. K., et al. (1996). “An analytical solution of the Boussinesq equation for subsurface drainage in the presence of evapotranspiration.” Trans. ASAE, 39(3), 953–960.
Taylor, G. S. (1960). “Drainable porosity evaluations from outflow measurements and its use in drawdown equation.” Soil Sci., 90(60), 338–343.
Upadhyaya, A., and Chauhan, H. S. (2000). “An analytical solution for bi-level drainage design in the presence of evapotranspiration.” Agric. Water Manage., 45, 169–184.
Van Schilfgaarde, J. (1974). “Non-steady flow to drains.” Drainage for agriculture, J. van Schilfgaarde, ed., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis., 245–270.
Yitayew, M., Khan, A. A., and Warrick, A. W. (1998). “In situ measurements of soil hydraulic conductivity using point application of water.” Trans. ASAE, 41(2), 115–120.
Zou, Z. Y., Young, M. H., Li, Z., and Wierenga, P. J. (2001). “Estimation of depth averaged unsaturated soil hydraulic properties from infiltration experiments.” J. Hydrol., 242, 26–42.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 4, 2004
Accepted: Apr 26, 2006
Published online: Apr 1, 2007
Published in print: Apr 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.