TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 2006

Sensitivity Analyses and Sensitivity Coefficients of Standardized Daily ASCE-Penman-Monteith Equation

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 6

Abstract

The sensitivity of the standardized ASCE grass-reference Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration (ASCE-PM ETo ) equation to climate variables in different regions has not yet been studied. Sensitivity analyses for the standardized daily form of the ASCE-PM equation were conducted on wind speed at 2m height (U2) , maximum and minimum air temperatures ( Tmax and Tmin ), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and solar radiation (Rs) in the following regions of the United States: semiarid (Scottsbluff, Nebraska, and Bushland, Texas), a Mediterranean-type climate (Santa Barbara, California), coastal humid (Fort Pierce, Florida), inland humid and semihumid (Rockport, Missouri, and Clay Center, Nebraska), and an island (Twitchell Island, California). The sensitivity coefficients were derived for each variable on a daily basis. In general, ETo was most sensitive to VPD at all locations, while sensitivity of ETo to the same variable showed significant variation from one location to another and at the same location within the year. After VPD, ETo was most sensitive to U2 in semiarid regions (Scottsbluff, Clay Center, and Bushland) during the summer months. The Rs was the dominant driving force of ETo at humid locations (Fort Pierce and Rockport) during the summer months. At Santa Barbara, the sensitivity of ETo to U2 was minimal during the summer months. At Bushland, Scottsbluff, and Twitchell Island, ETo was more sensitive to Tmax than Rs in summer months, whereas it was equally sensitive to Tmax and Rs at Clay Center. The ETo was not sensitive to Tmin at any of the locations. The change in ETo was linearly related to change in climate variables (with r20.96 in most cases), with the exception of Tmin , at all sites. Increase in ETo with respect to increase in climate variable changed considerably by month. On an annual average, a 1°C increase in Tmax resulted in 0.11, 0.06, 0.16, 0.07, 0.11, 0.08, and 0.10mm increases in ETo at Scottsbluff, Santa Barbara, Bushland, Fort Pierce, Twitchell Island, Rockport, and Clay Center. A 1ms1 increase in U2 resulted in 0.42, 0.18, 0.37, 0.28, 0.31, 0.20, and 0.26mm increases in ETo at the same locations. A unit increase in Tmax resulted in the largest increase in ETo at Bushland, and a unit increase in Rs caused the largest increases in ETo at Fort Pierce. A 1MJm2d1 increase in Rs resulted in 0.05, 0.08, 0.06, 0.11, 0.05, 0.06, and 0.06mm increases in ETo at the same locations. A 0.4kPa increase in VPD resulted in 1.13, 0.54, 1.29, 0.57, 1.04, 1.10, and 1.22mm increases in ETo at the same locations. The U2 had the most effect on ETo at Scottsbluff and Bushland, the two locations where dry and strong winds are common during the growing season. The sensitivity coefficient for Rs was higher during the summer months and lower during the winter months, and the opposite was observed for VPD (except for Twitchell Island). The decrease of the sensitivity coefficients for Rs corresponding to an increase in the sensitivity coefficient for VPD is due to a decrease in the energy term in favor of the increase in significance of the aerodynamic term of the standardized ASCE-PM equation in summer versus winter months. Because the ASCE-PM and the Food and Agriculture Organization paper number 56 Penman-Monteith (FAO56-PM) equations are identical when applied on a daily time step, the results of the sensitivity analyses and sensitivity coefficients of this study should be directly applicable to the FAO56-PM equation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper is a contribution of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Agricultural Research Division, Lincoln, Nebraska, Journal Series No. 14926. The mention of trade names or commercial products is solely for the information of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln or the USDA Agricultural Research Service.

References

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper No. 56, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Pereira, L. S., and Perrier, A. (1994a). “An update for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration.” ICID Bull., 43(2), 35–92.
Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Perrier, A., and Pereira, L. S. (1994b). “An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration.” ICID Bull., 43(2), 1–34.
Allen, R. G., et al. (2000). “Issues, requirements and challenges in selecting and specifying a standardized ET equation.” Proc., 4th Natl. Irrig. Symp., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.
ASCE-EWRI. (2005). The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation. Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) of ASCE, Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration Task Committee Final Rep.http://www.kimberly.uidaho.edu/water/asceewri/ascestzdetmain2005.pdf⟩.
Blaney, H. F., and Criddle, W. D. (1950). “Determining water requirements in irrigated areas from climatological and irrigation data.” USDA SCS-TP-96, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Doorenbos, J., and Pruitt, W. O. (1977). “Guidelines for prediction of crop water requirements.” FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper No. 24 (Revised), Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Doorenbos, J., and Pruitt, W. O. (1984). “Guidelines for predicting crop requirements.” FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper No. 24., 2nd Ed., Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 144.
Goyal, R. K. (2004). “Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: A case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India).” Agric. Water Manage., 69, 1–11.
Hargreaves, G. H. (1994). “Defining and using reference evapotranspiration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 120(6), 1132–1139.
Hupet, F., and Vanclooster, M. (2001). “Effect of the sampling frequency of meteorological variables on the estimation of the reference evapotranspiration.” J. Hydrol., 243, 192–204.
Irmak, S., Allen, R. G., and Whitty, E. B. (2003a). “Daily grass and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration estimates and alfalfa-to-grass evapotranspiration ratios in Florida.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(5), 360–370.
Irmak, S., Irmak, A., Allen, R. G., and Jones, J. W. (2003b). “Solar and net radiation-based equations to estimate reference evapotranspiration in humid climates.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(5), 336–347.
Irmak, S., Howell, T. A., Allen, R. G., Payero, J. O., and Martin, D. L. (2005). “Standardized ASCE-Penman-Monteith: Impact of sum-of-hourly vs. 24-hr -timestep computations at reference weather station sites.” Trans. ASAE, 48(3), 1063–1077.
Itenfisu, D., Elliot, R. L., Allen, R. G., and Walter, I. A. (2003). “Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculations as part of the ASCE standardization effort.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(6), 440–448.
Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D., and Allen, R. G. (1990). “Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements.” ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practices No. 70, ASCE, New York.
Jones, J. W. (1984). “Estimated and measured evapotranspiration for Florida climate, crops, and soils.” Bulletin (technical) 840, IFAS, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
Ley, T. W., Hill, R. W., and Jensen, D. T. (1994). “Errors in Penman-Wright alfalfa reference evapotranspiration estimates. II: Effects of weather sensor measurement variability.” Trans. ASAE, 37(6), 1863–1870.
McCuen, R. H. (1974). “A sensitivity and error analysis of procedures used for estimating evapotranspiration.” Water Resour. Bull., 10(3), 486–498.
Monteith, J. L. (1965). “Evaporation and environment.” 19th Symp., Society for Experimental Biology, University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Vol. 19, 205–234.
Monteith, J. L., and Unsworth, M. H. (1990). Principles of environmental physics, 2nd Ed., Chapman and Hall, New York.
Penman, H. L. (1963). “Vegetation and hydrology.” Technical Communication No. 53, Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden, U.K.
Penman, H. L. (1948). “Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass.” Proc. R. Soc. London, A193, 120–146.
Piper, B. S. (1989). “Sensitivity of Penman estimates of evaporation to errors in input data.” Agric. Water Manage., 15, 279–300.
Rana, G., and Katerji, N. (1998). “A measurement based sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration model for crops of different height and in contrasting water status.” Theor. Appl. Climatol., 60, 141–149.
Saxton, K. E. (1975). “Sensitivity analyses of the combination evapotranspiration equation.” Agric. Meterol., 15, 343–353.
Smajstrla, A. G., Zazueta, F. S., and Schmidt, G. M. (1987). “Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to four climatic variables in Florida.” Soil and Crop Sci. Soc. of Florida, 46, 21–26.
Snyder, R. L., and Pruitt, W. O. (1992). “Evapotranspiration data management in California.” Irrigation and drainage: Saving a threatened resource—In search of solutions, T. Engman, ed., ASCE, New York, 128–133.
Snyder, R. L., and Pruitt, W. O. (1985). “Chapter VII: Estimating reference evapotranspiration with hourly data.” Vol. I: California Irrigation Management Information System Final Rep., Land, Air and Water Resources Paper No. 10013-A, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
Sohrabi, T. M., Busch, J. R., and Wright, J. L. (1988). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of Wright—1982 Penman ET and crop water-use model.” Paper No. 88-2527, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.
Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948). “An approach toward a rational classification of climate.” Geogr. Rev., 38, 55–94.
Walter, I. A., et al. (2001). “The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation.” Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) of the Am. Soc. of Civil. Engrs., ASCE, Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration Task Committee Rep. (December 30, 2001).
Walter, I. A., et al. (2000). “ASCE’s standardized reference evapotranspiration equation.” Proc., 4th National Irrigation Symp., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.
Wright, J. L. (1982). “New evapotranspiration crop coefficients.” J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., 108(1), 57–74.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 132Issue 6December 2006
Pages: 564 - 578

History

Received: Feb 3, 2005
Accepted: Mar 24, 2006
Published online: Dec 1, 2006
Published in print: Dec 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Suat Irmak, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biological Systems Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 234 L.W. Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0726 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
José O. Payero
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biological Systems Eng., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, West Central Research and Extension Center, 461 W. University Drive, North Platte, NE 69101.
Derrel L. Martin, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Biological Systems Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 230 L.W. Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0726.
Ayse Irmak
Research Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biological Systems Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 253 L.W. Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0726.
Terry A. Howell, M.ASCE
Supervisory Agricultural Engineer and Research Leader, USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012-0010.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share