TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2005

Agroecological Impacts from Salinization and Waterlogging in an Irrigated River Valley

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 2

Abstract

Extensive field data and calibrated flow and salt-transport models characterize the spatial and temporal patterns of salinity and waterlogging in an irrigated western river valley. Over three irrigation seasons, average seasonal aquifer recharge from irrigated fields in a 50,600ha study area ranges from 0.59to0.99m , including contribution from precipitation. The salinity of irrigation water varies from 618to1,090mgL . The water table is shallow, with 16 to 33% of irrigated land underlaid by an average water table less than 2m deep. Average water table salinity ranges from 2,680to3,015mgL , and average soil salinity from 2,490to3,860mgL . Crop yield reductions from salinity and waterlogging range from 0 to 89% on fields, with regional averages ranging from 11 to 19%. Annual salt loading to the river from subsurface return flows, generated in large part by dissolution from irrigation recharge, averages about 533kgirrigatedhaperkm . Upflux from shallow water tables under fallow ground contributes to about 65millionm3 (52,600acre-ft) per year of nonbeneficial consumption. Beyond problem identification, the developed database and models provide a basis for effectively addressing these problems through a systematic and comparative assessment of alternative solutions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible by the interested cooperation of more than 80 Arkansas Valley farmers. It was funded by grants from the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station, the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Bent County Soil Conservation District, the Fort Lyon Canal Company, and the Catlin Canal Company. Numerous agencies have provided valuable cooperative assistance, including the USDA Natural Resources Conserva-tion Service, the District 2 Office of the Colorado Division of Water Resources, the Pueblo Subdistrict Office of the USGS, the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, and the USDA Farm Services Agency.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM. (1996). “Standard guide for calibrating a ground-water flow model application.” D 5981-96, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Boumans, J. H., and van der Molen, W. H. (1964). “Ontwateringsbehoefte van Bev loaedide Gronden in Verband met hun Zouthuis houding.” Landbouwkundig Tijdschrift, 76, 880–887 (in Dutch).
Bouwer, H. (1969). “Salt balance, irrigation efficiency, and drainage design.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 95(1), 153–170.
Brigham Young University (BYU). (1999). The department of defense groundwater modeling system: GMS v3.0 reference manual, Environmental Modeling Research Laboratory, Provo, Utah.
Broner, I., and Lorenz, J. (1998). CropFlex: A crop management system user’s manual, Windows version, Dept. of Chemistry and Bioresoure Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Burkhalter, J. P. (2005). “Defining and engineering solutions for agroecological threats from salinity and waterlogging in an irrigated river valley.” PhD thesis, Civil Engineering Dept., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Colorado Climate Center. (1999–2001). “CoAgMet data access.” ⟨http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/∼coag/
Cressie, N. A. C. (1991). Statistics for spatial data, Wiley, New York, 314–319.
Dash, R. G. (1995). “Irrigation water use for the Fort Lyon Canal, Southeastern Colorado, 1989–90.” Water Resoures Investigations Report 94-4051, USGS, Denver.
Doorenbos, J., et al. (1986). “Yield response to water.” FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Gates, T. K., Burkhalter, J. P., Labadie, J. W., Valliant, J. C., and Broner, I. (2002). “Monitoring and modeling flow and salt transport in a salinity-threatened irrigated valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 128(2), 87–99.
Gates, T. K., and Grismer, M. E. (1989). “Irrigation and drainage strategies in salinity-affected regions.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 115(2), 255–284.
Ghassemi, F., Jakeman, A., and Nix, H. (1995). Salinization of land and water resources: Human causes, extent, management, and case studies, Univ. of New South Wales Press, Sydney, Australia.
Goff, K., Lewis, M. E., Person, M. A., and Konikow, L. F. (1998). “Simulated effects of irrigation on salinity in the Arkansas River Valley in Colorado.” Ground Water, 36(1), 76–86.
Houk, E. E. (2003). “Economic assessment of water management in agriculture: Managing salinity and waterlogging in the Arkansas River Basin and environmental water shortages in the Platte River Basin.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Agricultural Resource Economics, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Hurr, R. T., and Moore, J. E. (1972). “Hydrogeologic characteristics of the valley-fill aquifer in the Arkansas River Valley, Bent County, Colorado.” USGS, Denver.
Konikow, L. F., and Bredehoeft, J. D. (1974). “Modeling flow and chemical quality changes in an irrigated stream-aquifer system.” Water Resour. Res., 10(3), 546–562.
Maas, E. V., and Grattan, S. R. (1999). “Crop yields as affected by salinity.” Agricultural drainage, Agronomy No. 38, R. W. Skaggs and J. Van Schilfgaarde, eds., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis.
Major, T. J., Hurr, R. T., and Moore, J. E. (1970). “Hydrogeologic data for the lower Arkansas River Valley, Colorado.” USGS, Denver.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1988). “A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model.” Techniques of water resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Chapter A1, Book 6, USGS, Denver.
Miles, D. L. (1977). “Salinity in the Arkansas valley of Colorado.” Cooperative Extension Service, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
National Research Council (NRC. (1996). A new era for irrigation, Committee on the Future of Irrigation in the Face of Competing Demands, Water Science and Technology Board, NRC, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Nelson, G. A., Hurr, R. T., and Moore, J. E. (1989). “Hydrogeologic characteristics of the valley-fill aquifer in the Arkansas River Valley, Otero County, Colorado.” USGS, Denver.
Person, M. A., and Konikow, L. F. (1986). “Recalibration and predictive reliability of a solute-transport model of an irrigated stream-aquifer system.” J. Hydrol., 87, 145–165.
Pinder, G. F. (2002). Groundwater modeling using geographical information systems, Wiley, New York.
Postel, S. (1999). Pillar of sand: Can the irrigation miracle last? W. W. Norton, New York.
Rhoades, J. D., Chanduvi, F., and Lesch, S. (1999). “Soil salinity assessment: methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements.” FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 57, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Sayer, K., Cunningham, J., Gemperline, M., and Swihart, J. (1997). “Catlin Canal canal lining investigations.” Technical Report, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver.
Tanji, K. K., and Kielen, N. C. (2002). “Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas.” FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 61, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (1972a). Soil survey of Otero County, Colorado, USDA, SCS, La Junta, Colo.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (1972b). Soil survey of Bent County, Colorado, USDA, SCS, La Junta, Colo.
Zheng, C., and Wang, P. P. (1999). “MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; documentation and user’s guide.” Contract Report SERDP-99-1, U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 131Issue 2April 2005
Pages: 197 - 209

History

Received: Jan 8, 2004
Accepted: Jun 4, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2005
Published in print: Apr 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

J. Philip Burkhalter, M.ASCE [email protected]
Water Resources Engineer, Riverside Technology, Inc., Fort Collins, CO 80525. E-mail: [email protected]
Timothy K. Gates, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share