Water Rights to Return Flow from Urban Landscape Irrigation
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper presents our research on the issue of water rights to return flow from irrigation of urban landscapes. Municipalities in Colorado's Front Range, with rights to transmountain water and other “use to extinction” water rights, have begun to examine lawn irrigation as a possible source to augment their supplies. They claim that a significant percentage of water applied to lawns is not used by the turf grass, and eventually returns to the streams and ground-water systems. In accordance with their water rights, this deep percolation water can be reused by the municipalities. This paper reviews the methodologies used by various cities to estimate deep percolation and return flow as a function of applied water. It then analyzes how these findings were evaluated by the Water Courts in their decisions concerning credits for return flow. To provide an independent analysis of the irrigation–return flow relationships, research was recently conducted at the Colorado State University (CSU) (1992–96). The CSU research results indicate that the small lysimeters used by various cities are of acceptable accuracy compared to a large lysimeter and standard evapotranspiration equations for estimating consumptive use. For estimating deep percolation, results of this research support the findings of the previous studies conducted for the city of Colorado Springs and for the Cottonwood Water and Sanitation District in Denver.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Danielson, R. E., et al. (1979). “Water requirements for urban lawns.”The effect of conservation programs on the quality of urban lawns, A. S. Winje and J. E. Flack, eds., Colorado Water Resour. Res. Inst., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo., Completion Rep. No. 142.
2.
Gronning Engineering Company. (1989). “City of Colorado Springs ground-water development agumentation and exchange plans.”Rep., Denver, Colo.
3.
Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D., and Allen, R. G. (eds.) (1990). Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements, Manual No. 70, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
4.
Oad, R., Lusk, K., and Podmore, T.(1997). “Consumptive use and return flows in urban lawn water use.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 123(1), 62–69.
5.
Walter, I. A., Hill, R. W., and Burman, R. D. (1991). “Lysimeter use in water rights determination.”Proc., Int. Symp. on Lysimeters for Evapotranspiration and Envir. Measurements, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 96–104.
6.
Wheeler, W. W. and Associates. (1987). “Lysimeter study.”Rep., Englewood, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1997
Published in print: Jul 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.