Soil-Limiting Flow from Subsurface Emitters. I: Pressure Measurements
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 5
Abstract
Subsurface drip irrigation has become a common method for the irrigation of field crops, trees, and landscaping. When the predetermined discharge of the emitter is larger than the soil infiltration capacity, water pressure at the dropper outlet increases and can become positive. This pressure buildup in the soil decreases the pressure difference across the dripper and, subsequently, decreases the trickle discharge in a manner that depends on the dripper characteristic curve. A device was developed to measure simultaneously the pressure difference at the inlet and outlet of a subsurface emitter and the emitter discharge. In a preliminary study, discharge rate declines of 10–50% were measured for unplugged subsurface emitters. The extent of the discharge decrease due to back pressure depends on: (1) the soil type (the lower the hydraulic properties the larger the decrease); (2) the dripper discharge (larger decreases occur for higher nominal discharge); (3) possible cavities near the dripper outlet (a larger cavity decreases the back pressure); and (4) the drip system hydraulic properties. The increase in back pressure is rapid at the beginning and then approaches a final value after several minutes, which allows the use of an analytical approximation that assumes steady-state conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bar-Yosef, B., Sagiv, B., and Markovitch, T.(1989). “Sweet corn response to surface and subsurface trickle phosphorus fertigation.”Agronomy J., 81, 443–447.
2.
Gardner, W. R.(1958). “Some steady state solutions of unsaturated moisture flow equations with application to evaporation from a water table.”Soil Sci., 85, 228–232.
3.
Moore, R. E.(1939). “Water conduction from shallow water tables.”Hilgardia, 12, 383–427.
4.
Philip, J. R.(1968). “Steady infiltration from buried point sources and spherical cavities.”Water Resour. Res., 4, 1039–1047.
5.
Philip, J. R.(1992). “What happens near a quasi-linear point source?”Water Resour. Res., 28, 47–52.
6.
Scotter, D. R., Clothier, B. E., and Harper, E. R.(1982). “Measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity and sorptivity using twin rings.”Australian J. Soil Res., Melbourne, Australia, 20, 295–304.
7.
Shani, U., Hanks, R. J., Bresler, E., and Oliveira, C. A. S.(1987). “A simple field method for estimating the hydraulic conductivity and matric potential-water content relations of soils.”Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 298–302.
8.
Shani, U., Waisel, Y., and Eshel, A. (1995). “The development of melon roots under trickle irrigation: Effects of the location of the emitters.”Structure and function of roots, F. Baluska, ed., 223–225.
9.
Smettem, K. R. J., and Clothier, B. E.(1989). “Measuring unsaturated sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity using multiple disc permeameters.”J. Soil Sci., 40, 563–568.
10.
Warrick, A. W.(1993). “Comment on `What happens near a quasi-linear point source?' by Philip.”Water Resour. Res., 29, 3299–3300.
11.
Wooding, R. A.(1968). “Steady infiltration from a shallow circular pond.”Water Resour. Res., 4, 1259–1273.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1996
Published in print: Oct 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.