Methods and Economics of Drainage Reduction through Improved Irrigation
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 2
Abstract
Drainage reduction through improved irrigation is needed for addressing the problem of drainage water disposal in the San Joaquin Valley in California. Options for improving irrigation include improved management of existing systems (irrigation scheduling, duration of water applications), upgrading traditional surface irrigation systems (reduced field length, increased unit flow rate, surge irrigation, furrow compaction, tailwater recovery), and converting to pressurized irrigation systems (hand‐move and linear‐move sprinklers, low‐energy precision application (LEPA) machines and rip irrigation). The most effective upgrade of surface irrigation systems for reducing subsurface drainage is a reduced field length coupled with reduced irrigation times. Increased furrow flow rates resulted in little change in drainage in some cases. Surge irrigation offers an opportunity of reducing subsurface drainage by only about 1/3. Converting to pressurized irrigation methods can substantially reduce subsurface drainage, but may be uneconomical in some cases. Analyses of large‐scale field comparisons of irrigation methods revealed that generalizing about the best irrigation method is difficult. Economic analyses of these comparisons showed a well‐managed furrow system to be more profitable than a subsurface drip system in one case, but a subsurface drip system to be more profitable compared to a marginally managed furrow system in another case. The analyses also revealed that disposal costs of subsurface drainage water may need to be much higher than projected costs to economically justify converting from furrow irrigation to irrigation systems with high capital costs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Boyle Engineering Corporation. (1990). Demonstration of emerging irrigation technologies: fourth semiannual progress report. Submitted to the State Department of Water Resources and the State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, Calif.
2.
Cervinka, V. (1990). A farming system for the management of salt and selenium on irrigated land (agriforestry). California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, Calif.
3.
Childs, J. L., Wallender, W. W., and Hopmans, J. W. (1993). “Spatial and seasonal variation of furrow infiltration.” J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 119(1), 74–88.
4.
Constable, G. A., and Hodgson, A. S. (1990). “A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil. 3. Yield and quality of four cultivars.” Irrig. Sci., 11, 149–153.
5.
Davis, K. (1983). “Trickle irrigation of cotton in California.” Western Cotton Production Conf., Las Cruces, N.M., 34–38.
6.
Dellavalle Laboratory, Inc. (1991). “1990 year end report to the state department of water resources.” Sacramento, Calif.
7.
Fulton, A. E., Oster, J. D., Hanson, B. R., Phene, C. J., and Goldhamer, D. G. (1991). “Can farmers use water more effectively?” California Agr., 45(2), 4–8.
8.
Goldhamer, D. A., Alemi, M. H., and Phene, R. C. (1987). “Surge vs continuous flow irrigation.” California Agr., 41(9, 10), 29–32.
9.
Goldhamer, D. A., and Peterson, C. M. (1984). “A comparison of linear‐move sprinkler and furrow irrigation on cotton: a case study. Final Tech. Rep., California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, Calif.
10.
Grimes, D. W., Walhood, V. T., and Dickens, W. L. (1968). Alternate‐furrow irrigation for San Joaquin Valley cotton. California Agr.
11.
Hanson, B. R. (1989). “Drainage reduction potential of furrow irrigation.” California Agric., 43(1), 6–8.
12.
Hanson, B. R., Schwankl, L. J., and Fulton, A. (1988). “Uniformity of low‐energy precise application (LEPA) irrigation machines.” California Agr., 42(5), 12–14.
13.
Hodgson, A. S., Constable, G. A., Duddy, G. R., and Daniells, I. G. (1990). “A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil. 2. water use efficiency, waterlogging, root distribution, and soil structure.” Irrig. Sci., 11, 143–148.
14.
Lee, E. W. (1990). “Drainage water treatment and disposal options.” Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
15.
Letey, J., Vaux, H. J. Jr., and Feinerman, E. (1984). “Optimum crop water application as affected by uniformity of water infiltration.” Agronomy J., 76, 435–441.
16.
Lyle, W. M., and Bordovsky, J. P. (1985). “Low energy precision application (LEPA) irrigation system.” Trans., Am. Soc. Agric. Engrs., 24(5), 1241–1245.
17.
Mateos, L., Berengena, J., Orgaz, F., Diz, J., and Fereres, E. (1991). “A comparison between drip and furrow irrigation in cotton at two levels of water supply.” Agric. Water Mgmt., 19, 1–12.
18.
Purkey, D. R., and Wallender, W. W. (1989). “Surge flow infiltration variability.” Trans., Am. Soc. Agric. Engrs., 32(3), 894–900.
19.
San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program. (1990). A management plan for agricultural subsurface drainage and related problems on the Westside San Joaquin Valley. Sacramento, Calif.
20.
Schwankl, L. J. (1990). “Improving irrigation efficiency of border irrigation.” Proc., 1990 Calif. Plant and Soil Conf.
21.
Schwankl, L., Hanson, B. R., and Panoras, A. (1991). “Furrow torpedoes improve irrigation water advance.” California Agric., 46(6), 15–17.
22.
Westlands Water District. (1991). Sprinkler management. Fresno, Calif.
23.
Smith, R. B., Oster, J. D., and Phene, C. (1991). “Subsurface drip produced highest net return in Westlands area study.” Calif. Agric., 45(2), 8–10.
24.
Stringham, G. E., and Hamad, S. N. (1975). “Design of irrigation runoff recovery systems.” J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., ASCE, 101(3), 209–218.
25.
Tanji, K. K. (1990). “Nature and extent of agricultural salinity.” Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
26.
Tarboton, K. C., and Wallender, W. W. (1989). “Field‐wide furrow infiltration variability.” Trans., Am. Soc. Agric. Engrs., 32, 913–918.
27.
University of California Committee of Consultants on Drainage Water Reduction, The University of California Salinity/Drainage Task Force and Water Resources Center. (1988). Associated costs of drainage water reduction. Davis, Calif.
28.
Wallender, W. W. (1986). “Furrow model with spatially varying infiltration.” Trans., Am. Soc. Agric. Engrs., 29, 1012–1016.
29.
Wilson, P., Ayer, H., and Snider, G. (1984). Drip irrigation for cotton. Agricultural Economic Report No. 517, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 2 • March 1994
Pages: 308 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 8, 1992
Published online: Mar 1, 1994
Published in print: Mar 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.