Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 3
Abstract
This report addresses the problem practicing engineers face as they try to evaluate the usefulness of watershed models for solving engineering problems. The report addresses the need for more complete parameter descriptions, unrealistic data needs, documentation, testing, and the lack of uniform criteria for evaluating a model's performance. The report makes recommendations for using some basic statistical measures to describe the performance of the models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barlas, Y. (1985). “Validation of system dynamics models with a sequential procedure involving multiple quantitative methods,” PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
2.
Burges, S. J. (1984). “Rainfall‐runoff model validation: The need for unambiguous tests.” Bridge between control science and technology (Proc. 9th Triennial World Congress IFAC), Budapest, Hungary, Jul. 2–6.
3.
Cavadias, G., and Morin, G. (1986). “Combination of simulated discharges of hydrological models: Application of the WMO intercomparison of conceptual models of snowmelt runoff.” Nordic Hydrol., 17(1), 21–30.
4.
Cavadias, G., and Morin, G. (1988). “Approximate confidence intervals for verification criteria of the WMO intercomparison of snowmelt runoff models.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 33(4), 69–77.
5.
Chen, B.‐C. H. (1985). “A statistical validation procedure for discrete simulation models over experimental regions,” PhD thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.
6.
Desh‐Ashtiani, M. (1986). “Confidence interval estimation of the steady‐state mean value of a simulation output process,” PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
7.
Ditmars, J. D., Adams, E. E., Bedford, K. W., and Ford, D. E. (1987). “Performance evaluation of surface water transport and dispersion models.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 113(8), 961–980.
8.
Doyle, W. H., and Miller, J. E. (1980). “Calibration of a distributed routing rainfall‐runoff model at four urban sites near Miami, Florida.” Water Resources Investigations Report 80‐1, U.S. Geological Survey, St. Louis, Mo.
9.
Garklavs, G., and Oberg, K. A. (1986). “Effect of rainfall excess calculations on modeled hydrograph accuracy and unit‐hydrograph parameters.” Water Resour. Bull., 22(4), 565–572.
10.
Garrick, M., Cumane, C., and Nash, J. E. (1978). “A criterion of efficiency for rainfall‐runoff models.” J. Hydrol., 36, 375–381.
11.
Gorgens, A. H. M. (1983). “Reliability of calibration of a monthly rainfall‐runoff model: The semi‐arid case.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 28(4), 485–498.
12.
Green, I. R. A., and Stephenson, D. (1986). “Criteria for comparison of single event models.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 31(3), 395–411.
13.
Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S. (1985). “The automatic calibration of conceptual catchment models using derivative‐based optimization algorithms.” Water Resour. Res., 21(4), 473–485.
14.
Hawley, M. E., McCuen, R. H., and Rango, A. (1980). “Comparison of models for forecasting snowmelt runoff volumes.” Water Resour. Bull., 16(5), 914–920.
15.
Hendrickson, J. D., Sorooshian, S., and Brazil, L. E. (1988). “Comparison of Newton‐type and direct search algorithms for calibration of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models.” Water Resour. Bull., 24(5), 691–700.
16.
“Hydrologic data for experimental argicultural watersheds in the U.S.” (1973). USDA miscellaneous Publication 1420, U.S. Dept. of Agric., Washington, D.C.
17.
“Intercomparison of models of snowmelt runoff.” (1986). Operational Hydrology Report No. 23, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
18.
Isabel, D., and Villeneuve, J. P. (1986). “Importance of the convergence criterion in the automatic calibration of hydrologic models.” Water Resour. Res., 22(10), 1367–1370.
19.
Jennings, M. E. (1976). “Comparison of the predictive accuracy of models of urban flow and water‐quality processes.” Proc. Nat. Symp. on Urban Hydrol., Hydr. and Sediment Control, B. J. Barfield, ed., Lexington, Ky., Jul. 27–29.
20.
Klemes, V. (1986). “Operational testing of hydrologic simulation models.” Hydrol. Sci., 31(1), 13–24.
21.
Kirpich, P. Z. (1940). “Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds.” Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 10(6), 362.
22.
Linsley, R. K. (1986). “Flood estimates: How good are they?” Water Resour. Res., 22(9), 159S–164S.
23.
Loague, K. M., and Freeze, R. A. (1985). “A comparison of rainfall‐runoff modeling techniques on upland catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 21(2), 229–248.
24.
Lusby, G. C., and Lichty, R. W. (1983). “Use of rainfall‐simulator data in precipitation‐runoff modeling studies.” Water Resources Investigations Report 83‐4159, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo.
25.
Martinec, J., and Rango, A. (1989). “Merits of statistical criteria for the performance of hydrological models.” Water Resour. Bull., 25(2), 421–432.
26.
McCuen, R. H., and Bondelid, T. R. (1983). “Estimating unit hydrograph peak rate factors.” J. Irrig. Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 109(2), 238–250.
27.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part 1—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
28.
Pathak, C. S., Crow, F. R., and Bengtson, R. L. (1984). “Comparative performance of two runoff models on grassland watersheds.” Trans., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 27(2), 397–402.
29.
Rango, A., and Martinec, J. (1981). “Accuracy of snowmelt runoff simulation.” Nordic Hydrol., 12(4/5), 265–274.
30.
Sabol, G. V., and Ward, T. J. (1985). “Santa Barbara hydrograph with Green‐Ampt infiltration.” Proc. 1985 ASCE Watershed Management Symp.—Watershed Management in the Eighties, ASCE, 84–91.
31.
Shrader, M. L., McCuen, R. H., and Rawls, W. J. (1980). “The effect of data independence in model calibration and model testing.” Water Resour. Bull., 16(1), 49–55.
32.
Smith, R. A., and Amisial, R. A. (1982). “Comparative analysis of various rainfall‐runoff models.” Int. Symp. on Hydrometeorology, American Water Resources Association, Denver, Colo., Jun. 13–17.
33.
Troutman, B. M. (1985). “Errors and parameter estimation in precipitation‐runoff modeling: I. Theory.” Water Resour. Res., 21(8), 1195–1213.
34.
Ward, T. J. (1985). “Watershed modeling using ‘standard’ Green‐Ampt infiltration parameters—a case study,” presented at the workshop A National Survey: Selected Problems and Solutions in Applied Hydrology and Hydrogeology, American Institute of Hydrology, Minneapolis, Minn., May 16–17.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 3 • May 1993
Pages: 429 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 23, 1992
Published online: May 1, 1993
Published in print: May 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.