Including Uncertainty of Hydraulic Conductivity into Drainage Design
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 5
Abstract
Hydraulic conductivity is one of the most important factors controlling water‐table depth in subsurface drained agricultural land. The current design procedure is to calculate lateral drain spacing using some average of hydraulic conductivity measurements within the area to be drained. In this paper, a procedure is presented to take into account uncertainty in hydraulic conductivity and water‐table depth when delineating areas to which a single lateral drain spacing can be assigned. The procedure uses simple block kriging of log‐transform hydraulic conductivity data to estimate the effective hydraulic conductivity of square blocks with sides equal to lateral drain spacing. (Kriging is a statistical method, based on the theory of regionalized variables and developed by D. G. Krige, for local estimation of soil properties.) Kriged estimates and estimation variances are combined to define the cumulative distribution function of the water‐table depth, which is the basis for deciding whether a given area needs to be subdivided to achieve adequate water‐table control. This procedure can be implemented for interactive use into subsurface drainage design software using computer‐aided design (CAD) and geographical information system (GIS) technology. The method is illustrated with the Hooghoudt's equation and applied to a practical design situation in a 80‐ha area in the Nile Delta of Egypt.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abramovitz, M., and Stegun, I. (1965). Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover Publishing, New York, N.Y.
2.
Ahmed, S., and De Marsily, G. (1987). “Comparison of geostatistical methods for estimating transmissivity using data on transmissivity and specific capacity.” Water Resour. Res., 23(9), 1717–1737.
3.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. McGraw‐Hill Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Bouwer, H. (1969). “Planning and interpreting soil permeability measurements.” J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., ASCE, 95(3), 391–402.
5.
Englund, E., and Sparks, A. (1988). GEO‐EAS (Geostatistical environment assessment software) User's guide. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nev.
6.
“Drainage design factors.” (1986). Irrigation and Drainage paper no. 38. Food and Agriculture Organization, the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
7.
Gallichand, J., Prasher, S. O., Broughton, R. S., and Marcotte, D. (1991). “Kriging of hydraulic conductivity for subsurface drainage design.” J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg. 117 (5), 667–681.
8.
Gallichand, J., Marcotte, D., Prasher, S. O., and Broughton, R. S. (1992). “Optimal sampling density of hydraulic conductivity for subsurface drainage design in the Nile Delta.” Agric. Water Mgmt., 20(4), 299–312.
9.
“Review of geostatistics in geohydrology. I: basic concepts.” (1990). ASCE Task Committee on Geostatistical Techniques in Geohydrology, J. Hydr. Engrg., 116(5), 612–632.
10.
Journel, A. G., and Huijbretgs, C. J. (1978). Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London, U.K.
11.
Luthin, J. N. (1978). Drainage engineering. R. E. Krieger Publishing Co., Huntington, N.Y.
12.
Matheron, G. (1967). “Composition des perméabilités en milieu poreux hétérogènes: méthode de Schwyndler et règies de pondération.” Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole, 22(3), 443–466.
13.
Metzger, J. F., Gallichand, J., Brichieri‐Colombi, J. S. A., Nosseir, F., and MacIntyre, D. I. (1990). “Design procedures for a large scale subsurface drainage project in Egypt.” Appl. Engrg. Agric., 6(4), 432–436.
14.
Prasher, S. O., Denis Russell, S. O., Podmore, T. H., and Chieng, S. T. (1984). “First and second order analyses of parameter uncertainty in drainage design.” Trans. ASAE, 27(4), 1081–1086.
15.
Skaggs, R. W. (1976). “Determination of the hydraulic conductivity—drainable porosity ratio from water table measurements.” Trans. ASAE, 19(1), 73–80, 84.
16.
Strzepek, K., and Garcia, L. (1987). “Optimal design of tile drains under uncertainties in soil properties.” Drainage design and management, Proc. Fifth Nat. Drainage Symp., Publication 07–87, American Society Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich., 53–62.
17.
Strzepek, K. M., Wilson, J. L., and Marks, D. H. (1982). “Planning and design of agricultural drainage under uncertainty: a dynamic multi‐level approach.” Report No. 281, Ralph M. Parsons Hydrology and Water Resource Systems, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
18.
van Beers, W. J. F. (1983). The auger hole method. International Institute of Land Reclamation and Improvement, Bull. no. 1, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 5 • September 1992
Pages: 744 - 756
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1992
Published in print: Sep 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.