Flood Skew in Hydrologic Design on Ungaged Watersheds
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 2
Abstract
The skew of a peak‐discharge frequency curve is an important determinant of the magnitude of events having small exceedance probabilities. Unfortunately, methods for estimating skews for ungaged locations provide highly inaccurate estimates. This appears to be the result of a lack of understanding of the primary causes of variation in skew. An analysis of existing hydrologic methods indicates that the skew assumed with these methods for ungaged locations is different than the mean skew for gaged sites in the same area. Furthermore, the design methods suggest that watershed storage is the primary factor affecting skew, with an increase in skew as the volume of watershed storage is decreased. Variables that show greater potential for providing accurate estimates of skew are discussed, and a relationship for estimating the effect of imperviousness on skew is provided.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Brakensick, D. L., and Rawls, W. J. (1983), “Green‐Ampt infiltration model parameters for hydrologic classification of soils.” Advances in irrigation and drainage: surviving external pressures, J. Borelli, V. R. Hasfurther, and R. D. Burman (eds.), ASCE, New York, N.Y., 226–233.
2.
Estimating peak flow frequencies for natural ungaged watersheds. (1981). U.S. Water Resources Council, Hydrology Committee, Washington, D.C.
3.
Gries, N. P. (1983). “Flood frequency analysis: a review of 1979‐1982,” Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 21(3), 699–706.
4.
“Guidelines for determining flood flow frequencies.” (1982). Bulletin 17B, Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Hydrology Subcommittee, U.S.G.S., Reston, Va.
5.
Hardison, C. H. (1975). “Generalized skew coefficients of annual floods in the United States and their applications.” Water Resour. Res., 10(5), 745–752.
6.
McCuen, R. H. (1979). “Map skew.” J. Water Resour. Plng. Mgmt. Div., ASCE, 105(WR2), 269–277.
7.
McCuen, R. H. (1983). “Methods for design of infiltration based stormwater control methods,” Technical Report, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
8.
Rawls, R. J., Wong, S. L., and McCuen, R. H. (1981). “Comparison of urban peak flow methods.” Technical Report, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
9.
Soil Conservation Service. (1969). “Computer program for project formulation,” Technical Release No. 20, USDA, Washington, D.C.
10.
Soil Conservation Service. (1975). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds,” Technical Release No. 55, USDA, Washington, D.C.
11.
Tasker, G. D. (1978). “Flood frequency analysis with a generalized skew coefficient.” Water Resour. Res., 14(2), 373–376.
12.
Wallis, J. R., Matalas, N. C., and Slack, J. R. (1974). “Just a moment.” Water Resour. Res., 10(2), 211–219.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 114 • Issue 2 • May 1988
Pages: 301 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1988
Published in print: May 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.