Range of Validity of the Transient Damping Leakage Detection Method

In a recent paper, an elegant, efficient, and easy to apply transient-based leakage detection method was proposed. The method exploits the fact that friction and leakage damp the modes of transient waves in a different manner. The method involves six major assumptions. These are: (1) the periodic motion in time of each mode is linearly independent of all other modes; (2) the amplitude of the induced transient is small; (3) the magnitude of the leak is small in comparison with the flow rate; (4) the wall friction can be represented by the Darcy–Weisbach equation; (5) the transient is initiated by an instantaneous small amplitude disturbance; and (6) the pipe system is a simple reservoir–pipe–valve type system or reservoir–pipe–reservoir type system. These six assumptions are relaxed and the validity of the transient damping method is assessed. The analysis shows that the first four assumptions do not pose any serious restriction to the applicability of the damping rate method provided that the mathematical model, used to generate the transient head trace in the leak-free pipe, accurately represents the frictional damping in the system. On the other hand, Assumptions (5) and (6) restrict the applicability of the method to systems that do not involve internal boundary conditions, such as junctions and pumps, and to transients triggered by impulses whose duration is smaller than the wave travel time. Extension of this method to complex pipe systems requires that the linearized waterhammer equations are solved under more general initial and boundary conditions. In addition, more investigation in relation to the frequency content of the input signal and its importance in leakage detection is warranted. The general framework used to derive the damping rate method has led to an efficient and direct algorithm for identifying leaks and future research should seek ways to adapt this framework to more complex pipe systems.