Scour Countermeasures for Wing-Wall Abutments
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 6
Abstract
An experimental study of scour countermeasures for wing-wall abutments under mobile-bed conditions is reported. The purpose of the study was to determine the required apron size to protect a wing-wall abutment from scour under mobile-bed conditions, for different flow depths, flow velocities, and apron placement level. Riprap and cable-tied block countermeasures were investigated. It was observed that scour at the abutment undermines the apron, causing the outer edge of the apron to settle. Scour at the abutment can be a combination of localized scour (i.e., contraction scour and local scour) and scour due to the troughs of the bed forms that migrate past the abutment, the latter being the focus of the study presented. As the flow depth and flow velocity are increased, the outer edge of the apron settles into the sand, to a depth proportional to the height of the bed forms developed in the flume. Localized scour may additionally influence the depth of settlement. When the apron width is increased, the depth to which the outer edge settles remains reasonably constant. When the apron is preburied below the average bed level, the settlement of the outer edge is less, but the depth of the outer edge of the apron below the average bed level is the same as for the corresponding apron placed on top of the bed. Riprap and cable-tied block aprons respond in different ways. Stones at the outer edge of riprap aprons tend to roll away from the abutment as they settle, pushing the erosion zone further away from the abutment. Conversely, because cable-tied block mats remain attached to the abutment, apron settlement allows the scour to occur closer to the abutment face. It is concluded that the scour at abutments under mobile-bed conditions is often governed by the size of the bed forms that pass the abutment. Therefore, the design of armored scour countermeasures for abutments under mobile-bed conditions should be based upon the largest expected bed forms, which can be predicted based on existing expressions, together with any effects of localized scour. This will enable the settlement of the outer edge of the apron to be determined, and the required apron width to be chosen, depending on the tolerable distance between the deepest scour and the abutment. An equation is given for prediction of the minimum width of apron remaining horizontal after erosion.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgment
This project was undertaken with financial support from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, UNSPECIFIEDNCHRP 24-18.
References
Ashley, G. M. (1990). “Classification of large-scale subaqueous bedforms: A new look at an old problem.” J. Sediment. Petrol., 60(1), 160–172.
Austroads. (1994). “Waterway design—A guide to the hydraulic design of bridges, culverts and floodways.” Sydney, Australia.
Central Board of Irrigation and Power. (1989). “River behavior management and training.” Publication No. 204, Vol. 1, C. V. J. Sharma, K. R. Saxema, and M. K. Rao, eds., New Delhi, India.
Cheung, K. M. (2002). “Cable-tied blocks as a countermeasure.” ME thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., The Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Chiew, Y. M. (1995). “Mechanics of riprap failure at bridge piers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 121(9), 635–643.
Croad, R. N. (1989). “Investigation of the preexcavation of the abutment scour hole at bridge abutments.” Rep. No. 89-A9303, Central Laboratories, Works and Development Services Corporation (NZ) Ltd., Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Eve, N. J. (1999). “Riprap protection of bridge abutments.” ME thesis, Civil and Resource Engineering Dept., The Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Gregorius, B. H. (1985). “Waterway design procedures—Guidelines.” Civil division publication, Ministry of Works and Development, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Harris, J. D. (1988). “Hydraulic design of bridges.” MTC drainage manual, drainage and hydrology section, Chap. 1, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Downsview, Ont., Canada.
Hoe, D. A. (2001). “Cable-tied block protection of bridge abutments.” Project Rep. No. PCRE 01:18, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, The Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jones, J. S., Bertoldi, D. A., and Stein, S. (1995). “Alternative scour countermeasures.” Proc., Hydraulic Engineering ’95, ASCE, New York, 1819–1823.
Lauchlan, C. S. (1999). “Countermeasures for pier scour.” Ph.D. thesis, The Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lewis, G. L. (1972). “Riprap protection of bridge footings.” Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Macky, G. H. (1986). “Model testing of bridge abutment scour protection.” Rep. No. 3-86/12, Central Laboratories, Ministry of Works and Development, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Melville, B. W. (1997). “Pier and abutment scour: Integrated approach.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 123(2), 125–136.
Melville, B. W., and Coleman, S. E. (2000). Bridge scour, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo.
Melville, B. W., van Ballegooy, R., and van Ballegooy, S. (2006). “Flow-induced failure of cable-tied blocks,” J. Hydraul. Eng., 132(3), 235–245.
Ministry of Works and Development. (1979). “Code of practice for the design of bridge waterways.” Civil Division Publication No. CDP 705/C, Wellington, New Zealand.
Pagan-Ortiz, J. E. (1991). “Stability of rock riprap for protection at the toe of abutments located at the flood plain.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-91-057, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Parker, G., Toro-Escobar, C., and Voigt, R. L., Jr. (1998). “Countermeasures to protect bridge piers from scour.” Draft Final Rep. (Project NCHRP 24-7), National Co-Operative Highway Research Program, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Parola, A. C. (1993). “Stability of riprap at bridge piers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 119(10), 1080–1093.
Przedwojski, B., Blazejeski, R., and Pilarczyk, K. W. (1995). River training techniques, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Richardson, E. V., and Davis, S. R. (1995). “Evaluating scour at bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA-IP-90-017, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18 (HEC-18), 3rd Ed., Office of Technology Applications, HTA-22, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Richardson, E. V., Simons, D. B., and Julien, P. Y. (1990). “Highways in the river environment.” Rep. No. FHWA-HI-90-016, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Simons, D. B., and Lewis, G. L. (1971). “Flood protection at bridge crossings.” C.S.U. Civil Engineering Rep. No. CER71-72DBS-GL10, prepared for the Wyoming State Highway Dept. in conjunction with the U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Simons, D. B., Li, R. M., and Associates. (1989). “Sizing riprap for the protection of approach embankments and spur dykes and limiting the depth of scour at bridge piers and abutments.” Rep. No. FHWA-AZ-89-260, Arizona Dept. of Transportation, Vol. 1, Pheonix.
van Rijn, L. (1984). “Sediment transport. III: Bed forms and alluvial roughness,” J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(12), 1733–1754.
Yalin, M. S. (1992). River mechanics, Pergamon, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 132 • Issue 6 • June 2006
Pages: 563 - 574
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2005
Accepted: Jun 15, 2005
Published online: Jun 1, 2006
Published in print: Jun 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.