Evaluation of the Micromodel: An Extremely Small-Scale Movable Bed Model
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 4
Abstract
The micromodel is an extremely small physical river model having a movable bed, varying discharge, and numerous innovations to achieve quick answers to river engineering problems. In addition to its size being as small as in channel width, the vertical scale distortion up to 20, Froude number exaggeration up to 3.7, and no correspondence of stage in model and prototype, place the micromodel in a category by itself. The writer was assigned to evaluate the micromodel’s capabilities and limitations to ensure proper application. A portion of this evaluation documents the deviation of the micromodel from similarity considerations used in previous movable bed models. The primary basis for this evaluation is the comparison of the micromodel to the prototype. The writer looked for comparisons that had (1) a reasonable calibration of the micromodel and (2) about the same river engineering structures constructed in the prototype that were tested in the micromodel and (3) a prediction by the micromodel of the approximate trends in the prototype. Evaluation of these comparisons shows a lack of predictive capability by the micromodel. Differences in micromodel and prototype likely result from uncertainty in prototype data and the large relaxations in similitude. Based on the lack of predictive evidence, the micromodel should be limited to demonstration, education, and communication for which it has been useful and should be of value to the profession.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The study described herein was funded by the USACE. The views expressed herein are the writer’s. Diverse views of micromodel capability exist within the USACE.
References
ASCE Task Committee on Hydraulic Modeling, Environmental and Water Resources Institute. (2000). “Hydraulic modeling: Concepts and practice.” Manual and Report No. 97, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Davinroy, R. D. (1994). “Physical sediment modeling of the Mississippi River on a micro scale.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Missouri–Rolla, Mo.
Davinroy, R. D. (1996). “Sedimentation study of the Mississippi River, New Madrid Bar Reach, miles 891 to 883, hydraulic micro model investigation.” USACE Rep., U.S. Army Engineer District, St. Louis, Mo.
de Vries, M., and van der Zwaard, J. J. (1975). “Movable-bed river-models.” Publication No. 156, Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft, The Netherlands.
Einstein, H. A., and Chien, N. (1955). “Similarity of distorted river models with movable beds.” Paper No. 2805, Transactions of the ASCE.
Ettema, R. (2001). “A framework for evaluating micro-models.” Limited Distribution Report No. 295, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, The Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Ettema, R., and Maynord, S. T. (2002). “Framework for evaluating very small hydraulic models of channel-control works.” Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods 2002, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Ettema, R., Melville, B. W., and Barkdoll, B. (1998). “Scale effect in pier-scour experiments.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 124(6), 639–642.
Ettema, R., and Muste, M. (2002). “Scale-effect trends on flow thalweg and flow separation at dikes in flat-bed channels.” IIHR Technical Rep. No. 426, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, Iowa City, Iowa.
Ettema, R., and Muste, M. (2004). “Scale effects in flume experiments on flow around a spur dike in flatbed channel.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(7), 635–646.
Falvey, H. T. (1999). Letter to Editor, “Misuse of term model.” Civil Engineering Magazine, ASCE, Reston, Va., Vol. 69, No. 12, December.
Foster, J. E. (1975). “Physical modeling techniques used in river models.” Symposium on Modeling Techniques, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Franco, J. J. (1978). “Guidelines for the design, adjustment and operation of models for the study of river sedimentation problems.” Instruction Rep. No. H-78-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
Freeman, J. R. (1929). Hydraulic laboratory practice, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Gaines, R. A. (2002). “Micro-scale moveable bed physical model.” PhD dissertation, Univ. of Missouri–Rolla, Mo.
Gaines, R. A., and Maynord, S. T. (2001). “Microscale loose-bed hydraulic models.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 127(5), 335–338.
Glazik, G. (1984). “Influence of river model distortion on hydraulic similarity of structures arranged at the channel.” Symp. on Scale Effects in Modeling Hydraulic Structures, Germany, International Association for Hydraulic Reserch, Esslingen, Germany.
Glazik, G., and Schinke, H. (1986). “Demonstration of scale effects in river models with movable bed by means of comparison of prototype and model family.” Symp. on Scale Effects in Modelling Sediment Transport Phenomenon, supplement, International Association for Hydraulic Research, Toronto.
Gordon, D. C., Davinroy, R. D., and Riiff, E. H. (1998). “Sedimentation and navigation study of the Lower Mississippi River at the White River Confluence, miles 603 to 596.” USACE Rep., U.S. Army Engineer District, St. Louis, Mo.
Graf, W. H. (1971). Hydraulics of sediment transport, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Gujar, V. G. (1981). “Determination of scales for mobile bed models with special reference to river models.” Irrig. Power, 38(2), New Delhi, India.
Jaeggi, M. N. R. (1986). “Non distorted models for research on river morphology.” Symp. on Scale Effects in Modelling Sediment Transport Phenomenon, International Association for Hydraulic Research, Toronto.
Latteux, B. (1986). “The LNH experience in modelling sediment transport under combined wave and current action.” Symp. on Scale Effects in Modelling Sediment Transport Phenomenon, supplement, International Association for Hydraulic Research, Toronto.
Maynord, S. T. (2002). “Comparison of surface velocities in micro-model and prototype.” Hydraulic measurements and experimental methods 2002, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Struiksma, N., and Klaasen, G. J. (1987). “On scale effects in movable-bed river models.” Communication No. 381, Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft, The Netherlands.
Suga, K. (1973). “Some notes on hydraulic model tests of river channels.” IAHR Int. Symp. on River Mechanics, Bangkok, Thailand.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2004). Rep. on the 68th Meeting, Micromodeling, Committee on Channel Stabilization, Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Miss.
Vollmers, H. J. (1986). “Physical modelling of sediment transport in coastal models.” Third Int. Proc., Symp. on River Sedimentation, S. Y. Wang, H. W. Shen, and L. Z. Ding, eds., Jackson, Miss.
Warnock, J. E. (1949). “Chapter 2: Hydraulic similitude.” Engineering hydraulics, Hunter Rouse, ed., John Wiley, New York.
Yalin, M. S. (1965). “Similarity in sediment transport by currents.” Hydraulics Research Paper No. 6, Hydraulics Research Station, Wallingford, U.K.
Yalin, M. S. (1971). Theory of hydraulic models, McMillan, London.
Zimmerman, C., and Kennedy, J. F. (1978). “Transverse bed slopes in curved alluvial streams.” J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 104(1), 33–48.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 132 • Issue 4 • April 2006
Pages: 343 - 353
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 18, 2004
Accepted: Feb 3, 2005
Published online: Apr 1, 2006
Published in print: Apr 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.