Analysis of Alternatives for Computing Backwater at Bridges
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 9
Abstract
The performance and reliability of four of the more popular methods for one-dimensional flow analysis of bridges were investigated. These four methods were the HEC-2 Normal Bridge Method, HEC-2 Special Bridge Method, WSPRO, and Modified Bradley Method. The study was based on models of 13 flood events at nine different bridge sites in the southeastern United States. The sites were located on wide, flat, heavily vegetated floodplains where only free-surface, subcritical flow conditions occurred. The results showed that the HEC-2 Normal Bridge Method was able to accurately simulate the measured backwater values when the recommended 4:1 expansion ratio assumption was not applied. The application of the 4:1 expansion ratio assumption generally resulted in water surface elevations and backwater values that were higher than the measured values. The HEC-2 Special Bridge Method generally underpredicted the measured backwater, and WSPRO tended to compute the backwater to be slightly greater than the measured values. The Modified Bradley Method consistently underpredicted the measured backwater amount at each site.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bradley, J. N. (1978). “Hydraulics of bridge waterways.”Hydr. Des. Series No. 1, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Fed. Hwy. Admin. (FHWA), Washington, D.C.
2.
Colson, B. E., Ming, C. O., and Arcement, G. J. (1978). “Backwater at bridges and densely wooded flood plains, Bogue Chitto near Johnston Station, Mississippi.”Hydrol. Investigations Atlas 591, Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo.
3.
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). (1990). HEC-2 water surface profiles user's manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, Calif.
4.
James, W. P., et al. (1989). “A&M watershed model user's manual.”Tech. Rep. No. 4, Civ. Engrg. Dept., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
5.
Matthai, H. F. (1967). “Measurement of peak discharge at width constrictions by indirect methods.”Techniques of water resources investigations. U.S. Geological Survey, Alexandria, Va.
6.
Schneider, V. R., Board, J. W., Colson, B. E., Lee, F. N., and Druffel, L. (1977). “Computation of backwater and discharge at width constrictions of heavily vegetated flood plains.”Water-Resour. Investigations 76-129, U.S. Geological Survey, Bay St. Louis, Mich.
7.
Shearman, J. O. (1990). “Users manual for WSPRO, a computer model for water surface profile computation.”Rep. No. FHWA-IP-89-027, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
8.
Shearman, J. O., Kirby, V. H ., Schneider, V. R., and Flippo, H. N. (1986). “Bridge waterways analysis model: Research report.”Rep. No. FHWA/RD-86/108. U.S. Dept. of Transp., Fed. Hwy. Admin. (FHWA), Reston, Va.
9.
Thompson, J. C. (1988). “Two-dimensional river modeling,” MS thesis, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 123 • Issue 9 • September 1997
Pages: 784 - 792
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1997
Published in print: Sep 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.