Search for Physically Based Runoff Model—A Hydrologic El Dorado?
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 3
Abstract
The search for physically based distributed runoff models has been underway for more than half a century. A great deal of progress has been made and we have a much better understanding of hydrological processes today than engineers and scientists did in the 1930s. Physically based models are being used more frequently in engineering practice, but questions are being raised regarding their “physical basis” and accuracy, and it has been suggested that simpler models are superior. Selected papers presenting tests of physically based models or comparisons with simpler models are reviewed. It is shown that, on a relatively small scale, these papers are overly pessimistic due to problems of hydrologic measurement and interpretation. However, there are great difficulties involved in scaling up to larger watersheds and we must realize that significant uncertainties are involved in predicting surface runoff.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Behlke, C. E. (1957). “The mechanics of overland flow,” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
2.
Beven, K. J. (1989). “Changing ideas in hydrology—the case of physically-based models.”J. of Hydro., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 105, 157–172.
3.
Brakensiek, D. L.(1966). “Hydrodynamics of overland flow and nonprismatic channels.”Trans. ASAE, 9(1), 119–122.
4.
Brakensiek, D. L., Osborn, H. B., and Rawls, W. J. (1979). “Field manual for research in agricultural hydrology.”USDA, Agric. Handbook 224, U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc.
5.
Engineering hydraulics, Proceedings of the fourth hydraulics conference. (1950). H. Rouse, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Engman, E. T., and Rogowski, A. S.(1974). “A partial area model for storm flow synthesis.”Water Resour. Res., 10(3), 464–472.
7.
Faurès, J.-M., Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Impact of small scale rainfall variability on runoff simulation.”J. of Hydro., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 173, 309–326.
8.
Freeze, R. A.(1980). “A stochastic-conceptual analysis of rainfall-runoff processes on a hillslope.”Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 391–408.
9.
Goodrich, D. C. (1990). “Geometric simplification of a distributed rainfall-runoff model over a range of basin scales,” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Hydro. and Water Resour., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson.
10.
Goodrich, D. C., Faurès, J.-M., Woolhiser, D. A., Lane, L. J., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective storm rainfall variability.”J. of Hydro., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 173, 283–308.
11.
Grayson, R. B., Moore, I. D., and McMahon, T. A.(1992). “Physically based hydrologic modeling 2, is the concept realistic?”Water Resour. Res., 28(10), 2659–2666.
12.
Harley, B. M., Perkins, F. E., and Eagleson, P. S. (1970). “A modular distributed model of catchment dynamics.”Rep. No. 133, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Massachusetts Inst. of Technol. (MIT), Cambridge, Mass.
13.
Hempel, C. G. (1963). “Explanations and predictions by covering laws.”Philosophy of science: the Delaware seminar, B. Baumrin, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., 107–133.
14.
Hjelmfelt, A. T. Jr., and Amerman, C. R. (1980). “The mathematical basin model of Merrill Bernard.”Proc., Int. Symp. on the Hydrological Regime; IAHS-AISH Publ. No. 130, Bartholomew Press, Surrey, England, 343–349.
15.
Hughes, D. A., and Beater, A. B. (1989). “The applicability of two single event models to catchments with different physical characteristics.”Hydrological Sci. J., Oxford, England, 34(1,2), 63–78.
16.
Knisel, W. G. (ed.). (1980). “CREAMS—a field scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems.”Conservation Res. Rep. 26, Sci. and Education Admin., U.S. Dept. of Agr., Washington, D.C.
17.
Liggett, J. A. (1959). “Unsteady open channel flow with lateral inflow.”Tech. Rep. 2, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, Calif.
18.
Liggett, J. A.(1990). “Computation (investigation, education and application).”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 116(12), 1436–1453.
19.
Liggett, J. A., and Woolhiser, D. A.(1967). “Difference solutions of the shallow water equation.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 93(2), 39–71.
20.
Lighthill, M. J., and Whitham, C. B. (1955). “On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers.”Proc., Royal Soc., London, England, Series A, Vol. 229.
21.
Loague, K. M., and Freeze, R. A.(1985). “A comparison of rainfall runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments.”Water Resour. Res., 21(2), 229–248.
22.
Michaud, J., and Sorooshian, S.(1994a). “Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed.”Water Resour. Res., 30(3), 593–605.
23.
Michaud, J., and Sorooshian, S.(1994b). “Effect of rainfall-sampling errors on simulations of desert flash floods.”Water Resour. Res., 30(10), 2765–2776.
24.
Minshall, N. E. (1960). “Predicting storm runoff on small experimental watersheds.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 86(B), 17–38.
25.
Morgali, J. R., and Linsley, R. K. (1965). “Computer analysis of overland flow.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE 91(3), 81–100.
26.
Naipaul, V. S. (1969). The loss of el dorado . Penguin Books, Ltd., Middlesex, England.
27.
Rosenblueth, A., and Wiener, N. (1945). “The role of models in science.”Philosophy of Sci., XII(4), 316–321.
28.
Schaake, J. C. Jr. (1965). “Synthesis of the inlet hydrograph.”Tech. Rep. 3, Storm Drain. Res. Proj., Dept. of Sanitary Engrg. and Water Resour., The Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, Md.
29.
Simons, D. B.(1992). “Future trends and needs in hydraulics.”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 118(12), 1607–1620.
30.
Singh, V. P., and Woolhiser, D. A. (1976). “Sensitivity of linear and nonlinear surface runoff models to input errors.”J. of Hydro., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 29, 243–249.
31.
Smith, R. E., and Hebbert, R. H. B.(1979). “A Monte Carlo analysis of the hydrologic effects of spatial variability of infiltration.”Water Resour. Res., 15(2), 419–429.
32.
Smith, R. E., and Parlange, J.-Y.(1978). “A parameter-efficient hydrologic infiltration model.”Water Resour. Res., 14(33), 533–538.
33.
Smith, R. E., and Woolhiser, D. A.(1971). “Overland flow on an infiltrating surface.”Water Resour. Res., 7(4), 899–913.
34.
Snyder, J. K., and Woolhiser, D. A.(1985). “Effects of infiltration on chemical transport into overland flow.”Trans. ASAE, 28(5), 1450–1457.
35.
Woolhiser, D. A.(1973). “Hydrologic and watershed modeling—state of the art.”Trans. ASAE, 16(3), 553–559.
36.
Woolhiser, D. A.(1975). “The watershed approach to understanding our environment.”J. Envir. Quality, 4(1), 17–21.
37.
Woolhiser, D. A., and Liggett, J. A.(1967). “Unsteady, one-dimensional flow on a plane—the rising hydrograph.”Water Resour. Res., 3(3), 753–771.
38.
Woolhiser, D. A., Jury, W. A., and Nielsen, D. R. (1990a). “Effects of spatial and temporal variability on water quality model development.”Proc., Int. Symp. on Water Quality Modeling of Agric. Non-Point Sources, Part 2; ARS-81, U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc., Washington, D.C., 505–522.
39.
Woolhiser, D. A., Smith, R. E., and Goodrich, D. C. (1990b). “KINEROS, a kinematic runoff and erosion model: documentation and user manual.”ARS-77, U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc., Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 3 • March 1996
Pages: 122 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1996
Published in print: Mar 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.