Short‐Term Solute Fluctuations in Ground Water: Modeling Implications
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 7
Abstract
As a preliminary phase in a predictive mass‐transport modeling study, ground‐water samples were collected from an unconfined, landfill‐contaminated aquifer over a five‐month time period. The dilution effect of recharge from a single precipitation event caused short‐term decreases of up to 56% in chloride concentrations measured at individual monitoring wells. A mass‐transport model was calibrated to contaminant plumes inferred from different sets of measured chloride concentrations. Sets of calibration parameters thereby attained were used to make separate, 50‐year contaminant distribution predictions. The resulting distributions contrasted significantly, particularly at the downgradient margin of the landfill where predicted chloride concentrations ranged from approximately 150–230 ppm. The results of this study suggest that: (1) Contaminant concentrations in shallow unconfined aquifers can fluctuate significantly in response to short‐term changes in hydrologic conditions; and (2) the selection of a set of “observed” concentrations, which is representative of an overall stage in the evolution of a plume, rather than indicative of short‐term extremes in contaminant concentrations, is an important step in calibrating a mass‐transport model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Faust, C. R., and Mercer, J. W. (1981). “Groundwater modeling: numerical methods.” Ground Water, 18(4), 395–409.
2.
Hudak, P. F., and Loaiciga, H. A. (1991). “Mass transport modeling in landfill‐contaminated buried valley aquifer.” J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., 117(2), 260–272.
3.
Konikow, L. F. (1977). “Modeling chloride movement in the alluvial aquifer at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Colorado.” U.S. Geological Survey water supply paper 2044, U.S. Geological Soc., Washington, D.C.
4.
Konikow, L. F., and Bredehoeft, J. D. (1974). “Modeling flow and chemical quality changes in an irrigated stream‐aquifer system.” Water Resour. Res., 19(3), 546–562.
5.
Konikow, L. F., and Bredehoeft, J. D. (1988). “Computer model of two‐dimensional solute transport and dispersion in ground water.” U.S. Geological Survey Book 7, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
6.
LeBlanc, D. R. (1984). “Digital modeling of solute transport in a plume of sewage‐ontaminated ground water, Cape Cod, Massachusetts.”
7.
U.S. Geological Survey open‐file report, U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Waste Ground‐Water Contamination Program, Washington, D.C., 11–45.
8.
Priddle, M. W., Jackson, R. E., and Mutch, J. P. (1989). “Contamination of the sandstone aquifer of Prince Edward Island, Canada by aldicarb and nitrogen residues.” Ground Water Monitoring Rev., 9(4), 134–140.
9.
Shirmohammadi, A. (1991). “Reduction of nitrate loadings to ground water.” Ground Water Monitoring Rev., 11(1), 112–118.
10.
Spieker, A. M. (1968). “Groundwater hydrology and geology of the lower Great Miami River Valley, Ohio.” U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 605‐A, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
11.
Watkins, J. S., and Spieker, A. M. (1968). “Seismic refraction surveys of Pleistocene drainage channels in the Lower Great Miami River Valley, Ohio.” U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 605‐B, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 7 • July 1993
Pages: 830 - 837
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 7, 1992
Published online: Jul 1, 1993
Published in print: Jul 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.