Applicability of St. Venant Equations for Two‐Dimensional Overland Flows over Rough Infiltrating Surfaces
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 1
Abstract
The physics‐based modeling of overland flow is accomplished through the numerical solution of the St. Venant equations. One of the assumptions used in the derivation of the St. Venant equations is that of gradually varied flow. In many instances, simpler forms of the flow equations (the kinematic and diffusion wave models) are utilized to save computational effort. The flow equations for all these models are nonlinear and frequently fail to converge when applied to surfaces with highly irregular microtopography, which yields abrupt changes in slopes at adjacent nodes. Since the flow equations perceive the flow profile as a thin sheet, the microtopography needs to be replaced by a smoother surface for computational purposes. Comparison of numerical solutions of the flow models with observed results over experimental hillslopes is satisfactory. Replacing the spatially varying microtopography with an average constant slope cause no significant change in the outflow hydrograph, which is a spatially integrated property. However, significant differences are obtained for the steady‐state local flow depths and velocities in the solution of the St. Venant equations over varying and smooth topographies. These results have important ramifications in modeling the transport of solutes or sediments by shallow surface flows.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Akan, A. O., and Yen, B. C. (1981). “Mathematical model of shallow water flow over porous media.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 107(4), 479–494.
2.
Amein, M. (1968). “An implicit method for numerical flood routing.” Water Resour. Res., 4(4), 719–726.
3.
Barfield, B. J., Barnhisel, R. I., Powell, J. L., Hirschi, M. C., and Moore, I. D. (1983). “Erodibilities and eroded size distribution of Western Kentucky mine spoil and reconstructed topsoil.” Institute for Mining and Minerals Research Final Report, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
4.
Brutsaert, W. (1971). “De Saint‐Venant equations experimentally verified.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 97(9), 1387–1401.
5.
Chow, V. T., and Zvi, A. B. (1973). “Hydrodynamic modeling of two‐dimensional watershed flow.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 99(11), 2023–2040.
6.
Govindaraju, R. S., Jones, S. E., and Kavvas, M. L. (1988). “On the diffusion wave modeling for overland flow 1. Solution for steep slopes.” Water Resour. Res., 25(5), 734–744.
7.
Gupta, S. K., and Tanji, K. K. (1977). “Computer program for solution of large, sparce, unsymmetric systems of linear equations.” Int. J. Numerical Methods in Engrg., 11, 1251–1259.
8.
Inoue, K., Iwasa, Y., and Matsuo, N. (1987). “Numerical analysis of two‐dimensional free surface flow by means of finite difference method and its application to practical problems.” Proc. of ROC‐Japan Joint Seminar on Water Resour. Engrg., Taipei, Republic of China, 171–190.
9.
Iwasa, Y. (1988). “Recent developments of numerical hydraulics.” 6th Congress Asian and Pacific Regional Div. Int. Assoc. for Hydr. Res., 1–18.
10.
Iwasa, Y., and Inoue, K. (1982). “Mathematical simulations of channel and overland flows in view of flood disaster engineering.” J. Nat. Disaster Sci., Kyoto, Japan, 4(1), 1–30.
11.
Joliffe, I. B. (1984). “Computation of dynamic waves in channel networks.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 110(10), 1358–1369.
12.
Kamahara, M., and Yokoyama, T. (1980). “Finite element method for direct runoff process.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 106(4), 519–534.
13.
Liggett, J. A., and Woolhiser, D. A. (1967). “Difference solutions of the shallow water equations.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 93(2), 39–71.
14.
Mein, R. G., and Larson, C. L. (1971). “Modeling the infiltration component of the rainfall‐runoff process.” Water Resour. Ctr. Bulletin 43, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.
15.
Mein, R. G., and Larson, C. L. (1973). “Modeling infiltration during a steady rain.” Water Resour. Res., 9(2), 384–394.
16.
Moore, I. D., and Foster, G. R. (1989). “Hydraulics and overland flow.” Process studies in hillslope hydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Sussex, England, 1–34.
17.
Morris, E. M. (1979). “The effect of small‐slope approximation and lower boundary conditions on solutions of the Saint‐Venant equations.” J. Hydr., 40, 31–47.
18.
Morris, E. M., and Woolhiser, D. A. (1980). “Unsteady one‐dimensional flow‐over a plane: Partial equilibrium and recession hydrographs.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 355–360.
19.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Miller, N. (1983). “Green‐Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 109(1), 62–70.
20.
Tayfur, G. (1990). “Modeling of two dimensional overland flows,” M.S. thesis, University of California, Davis, California.
21.
Vieira, J. H. D. (1983). “Conditions governing the use of approximations for the Saint Venant equations for shallow surface water flow.” J. Hydr., 60, 43–58.
22.
Woolhiser, D. A. (1974). “Unsteady free‐surface flow problems.” Proc. Inst. on Unsteady Flow in Open Channels, Colorado State University, 195–213.
23.
Woolhiser, D. A. (1975). “Simulation of unsteady overland flow.” Unsteady Flow in Open Channels, Water Resour. Publications, Fort Collins, Colo.
24.
Zhang, W., and Cundy, T. W. (1989). “Modeling of two‐dimensional overland flows.” Water Resour. Res., 25(9), 2019–2035.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 1 • January 1993
Pages: 51 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 19, 1991
Published online: Jan 1, 1993
Published in print: Jan 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.