Reliability‐Based Pier Scour Engineering
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 10
Abstract
Our infrastructure is aging. There are many bridges over water in this country, and these aging bridges are now showing signs of weakening due to scour around the pier foundations. In response, engineers are being required to design “safe” bridge piers such that the pier foundations will not be undermined by local scour. In this paper, the problem of relating the risk of bridge failure to the estimated maximum local scour depth is examined. Since safety factors are commonly used to incorporate uncertainties into design, the relationship between the risk of failure and safety factors is examined. A best‐fit pier scour model, rather than a conservative model, is used to develop a probabilistic approach to pier scour engineering. An example is provided to demonstrate the probabilistic approach. The level of risk for a bridge pier design is provided by the development of safety factors that are a direct reflection of the desired or allowable level of risk.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ang, A. H., and Tang, W. H. (1984). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. Volume II: Decision, risk, and reliability. Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
2.
Ayyub, B. M., and Haldar, A. (1985). “Practical structural reliability techniques.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(8), 1707–1724.
3.
Ayyub, B. M., and White, G. J. (1990). “Life expectancy assessment of marine tructures.” Marine Struct., 3(4), 301–317.
4.
Chee, R. K. W. (1982). “Live‐bed scour at bridge piers.” Report No. 290, School of Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
5.
Chiew, Y. M. (1984). “Local scour at bridge piers.” Report No. 355, School of ngineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
6.
Hopkins, G. R., Vance, R. W., and Kasraie, B. (1980). “Scour around bridge piers.” Report No. FHWA‐RD‐79‐103, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
7.
“Highways in the river environment.” (1990). Hydrologic Engineering Circular (HEC) 18, 2d Ed., U.S. Dept. of Transportation, FHWA, Washington, D.C.
8.
Jones, J. S. (1984). “Comparison of prediction equations for bridge pier and abutment scour.” TRB 950, Proc. Second Bridge Engrg. Conf., Vol. 2.
9.
Jones, J. S., Kilgore, R. T., and Mistichelli, M. P. (1992). “Effects of footing location on bridge pier scour.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 118(2), 280–290.
10.
Mays, L. W., and Tung, Y.‐K. (1992). Hydrosystems engineering and management. McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
11.
McCuen, R. H. (1985). Statistical methods for engineers. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
12.
McCuen, R. H. (1986). Hydrologic modeling. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
13.
White, G. J., and Ayyub, B. M. (1985). “Reliability methods for ship structures.” Navy Engrs. J., 97(4), 86–96.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 10 • October 1992
Pages: 1344 - 1358
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1992
Published in print: Oct 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.