Rainfall Disaggregation Model for Continuous Hydrologic Modeling
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 4
Abstract
Two empirical precipitation disaggregation models are developed for use in continuous hydrologic modeling. The first model is developed for use in disaggregating hourly rainfall data into 20‐min intervals. The second model is developed for use with disaggregation time intervals from 1–30 min. Use of such models allows a more precise prediction of watershed response than may be obtained using a one‐hour time step or a smaller time step with average rainfall values.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Donigian, A. S., and Linsley, R. K. (1979). “Continuous simulation for water quality modeling.” Water Resour. Bull., 15(1), 1–15.
2.
Ellis, F. W., Blood, W. H., and Baig, N. (1981). “A continuous hydrologic simulation approach to watershed management.” Proc. 1981 Int. Symp. on Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Sediment Control, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 1–7.
3.
Goforth, G. F., Heaney, J. P., and Huber, W. C. (1983). “Comparison of basin performance modeling techniques.” J. Environ. Engrg., ASCE, 109(5), 1082–1098.
4.
Huff, F. A. (1967). “Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms.” Water Resour. Res., 3(4), 1007–1019.
5.
Huber, W. C., et al. (1981). “Stormwater management model user's manual—Version III.” Project No. CR‐805664, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
6.
Hydroscience, Inc. (1979). “A statistical method for the assessment of urban stormwater loads—Impacts—Controls.” EPA—440/3—79—023, Office of Water Planning and Standards, Washington, D.C.
7.
Keifer, C. J., and Chu, H. H. (1957). “Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 83(HY4), 1332–1344.
8.
Linsley, R. K., and Crawford, N. J. (1974). “Continuous simulation, models in urban hydrology.” Geophys. Res. Letters, 1, 59–62.
9.
Liou, E. Y. (1970). “OPSET—Program for computerized selection of watershed parameter values of the Stanford watershed model.” Research Report No. 34, University of Kentucky Water Resources Institute, Lexington, Ky.
10.
Ormsbee, L. E. (1987). “Detention basin design using continuous simulation.” Proc. ASCE Specialty Conf. on Engineering Hydrology, Williamsburg, Va., 376–381.
11.
Musgrave, G. W. (1955). “How much water enters the soil.” Water—The yearbook of agriculture. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 151–159.
12.
Padmanabhan, G., and Delleur, J. W. (1982). “An alternative to the design storm approach for urban stormwater management.” Proc., Int. Symp. Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Sediment Control, Lexington, Ky., 267–274.
13.
Raasch, G. E. (1979). “Urban stormwater detention sizing technique.” Proc. 1979 Int. Symp. on Urban Storm Runoff, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky, 55–60.
14.
Rao, R. A., and Chenchayya, B. T. (1974). “Probabilistic analysis and simulation of the short time increment rainfall process,” Technical Report No. 55, Purdue University Water Resources Center, West Lafayette, In.
15.
Smith, P. E., and Alley, W. M. (1982). “Rainfall—runoff—quality model for urban watersheds.” Applied modeling in catchment hydrology, V. P. Singh, Ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo.
16.
Walesh, S. G., Lao, D. H., and Liebman, M. D. (1979). “Statistically based use of event models.” Proc. 1979 Int. Symp. on Urban Storm Runoff. University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky., 75–82.
17.
Yen, B. C., and Chow, V. T. (1980). “Design hyetographs for small drainage structures.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 106(6), 1055–1076.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1989
Published in print: Apr 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.