Simulating Effect of Channel Changes on Stream Infiltration
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 12
Abstract
We use a saturated‐unsaturated flow model (UNSAT2) to study the effect of soil cementing and channel widening on infiltration and recharge in two idealized profiles along the Rillito River of southern Arizona. The channel sections associated with the profiles are 202‐ft (61.6‐m) and 326‐ft (99.4‐m) wide. A synthetic 10‐yr runoff in the river provides head values for generating infiltration before and after bank protection in these two sections. Results from the two base simulations are combined to produce four additional cases. Soil cementing the banks of the river without widening the channel reduces infiltration and recharge by 15% for the 326‐ft wide (99.4‐m) channel and by 25% for the 202‐ft wide (61.6‐m) channel. Increasing channel width together with bank protection increases infiltration 25% for our two sections. Increasing channel width without bank protection, however, increases infiltration by 46% for our conditions. Channel narrowing with bank protection markedly increases infiltration rates, about 50% for the two sections.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Assessment of potential recharge sites for long‐term storage and recovery.” (1988). Tucson Recharge Feasibility Assessment, Task 5, Vol. 1, submitted by CH2M Hill, Inc., E. L. Montgomery and Associates, and L. G. Wilson, to Tucson Water, Tucson, Ariz.
2.
Bouwer, H. (1978). Groundwater hydrology. McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
3.
Burkham, D. E. (1970). “Depletion of streamflow by infiltration in the main channels of the Tucson basin.” Geological Survey Water Supply Paper No. 1939‐B, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
4.
Cluff, C. B., Katz, L. T., and Scovill, G. L. (1987). “Effects of channel stabilization in Tucson stream reaches on infiltration and groundwater recharge.” Natural Recharge Studies, Vol. II, Water Resour. Res. Ctr., Univ. of Ariz., Tucson, Ariz., 1987.
5.
Guma'a, G. S. (1978). “Spatial variability of in‐situ available water,” presented to the University of Arizona, at Tucson, Ariz., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
6.
Keith, S. J. (1980). “Stream channel recharge.” Final report, regional recharge for Southwest alluvial basins, Water Resour. Res. Ctr., Univ. of Ariz., Tucson, Ariz., 5.1–5.51.
7.
Neuman, S. P., Feddes, R. A., and Bresler, E. (1974). “Finite element simulation of flow in saturated‐unsaturated soils considering water uptake by plants: Development of methods, tools and solutions for unsaturated flow.” Third Annual Report, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
8.
Neuman, S. P. (1975). “Galerkin approach to saturated‐unsaturated flow in porous media,” Finite elements in fluids, vol., I: Viscous flow and hydrodynamics, R. H. Gallagher, J. T. Oden, and O. C. Zienkiewicz, eds., John Wiley and Sons, London, England, 201–217.
9.
Shields, S. J., et al. (1985). Soil cement applications and use in Pima county for flood control projects. Pima County Dept. of Transp. and Flood Control Dist., Tucson, Ariz.
10.
Van Genuchten, R. (1978). Calculating unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with a closed form analytical model. U.S. Salinity Lab., U.S. Dept. of Agric, Riverside, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1989
Published in print: Dec 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.