Initiative for Risk‐Based Flood Design
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 113, Issue 8
Abstract
A recent report of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data found that there is “no current procedure for assigning an exceedance probability to the probable maximum flood (PMF)… in a reliable, consistent, or credible manner.” This conclusion was used as justification for continuation of the current, quasi‐deterministic, PMF‐based spillway design methods used by all federal agencies. This is despite criticism by both researchers and practitioners that PMF‐based methods tend to lead to a false sense of security and to misallocation of resources for dam safety improvements. As an alternative to perpetuation of the status quo, the writers outline four general areas in which research should be promoted for improved estimation of extreme floods, as well as research aimed at development of a method for incorporation of risk information into spillway design. The writers believe that if the federal action agencies were to promote research in the areas suggested, the current stagnation that has set in would be broken, and the self‐fulfilling prophecy that there are no alternatives to current practice could no longer be justified.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baker, V. R., “Paleoflood Hydrology of Extraordinary Flood Events,” Proceedings, China‐U.S. Bilateral Symposium on the Analysis of Extraordinary Flood Events, Nanjing, China, Oct., 1985.
2.
Benson, M. A., “Factors Influencing the Occurrence of Floods in a Humid Region of Diverse Terrain,” U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper No. 1580‐B, 1962.
3.
Costa, J. E., “Interpretation of the Largest Rainfall‐Runoff Floods Measured by Indirect Methods on Small Drainage Basins in the Conterminous United States,” Proceedings, U.S.‐China Bilateral Symposium on the Analysis of Extraordinary Flood Events, Nanjing, China, Oct., 1985.
4.
Crippen, J. R., and Bue, C. D., “Maximum Flood Flows in the Conterminous United States,” U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper No. 1887, 1977.
5.
Dalrymple, T., “Flood Frequency Analysis,” U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper No. 1543‐A, 1960.
6.
Dawdy, D. R., “Variation of Flood Ratios with Size of Drainage Area,” U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 424‐C, 1961.
7.
Fiering, M. B., and Matalas, N. C., “Water Resource‐Systems Planning,” Climate, Climatic Change, and Water Supply: Studies in Geophysics, National Academy of Sciences, 1977, pp. 110.
8.
Franz, D. D., Kraeger, B. A., and Linsley, R. K., “A System for Generating Long Streamflow Records for Study of Floods of Long Return Period,” paper presented at International Symposium on Flood Frequency and Risk Analyses, Baton Rouge, La., May, 1986.
9.
Giusti, E. V., “Distribution of River Basin Area in the Conterminous U.S.,” IAHS Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1963, pp. 20–29.
10.
Hosking, J. R. M., and Wallis, J. R., “Paleoflood Hydrology and Flood Frequency Analysis,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, April, 1986, pp. 543–550.
11.
Hosking, J. R. M., Wallis, J. R., and Wood, E. F., “An Appraisal of the Regional Flood Frequency Procedure in the UK Flood Studies Report,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 30, 1985.
12.
Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Hydrology Subcommittee, “Feasibility of Assigning a Probability to the Probable Maximum Flood,” 1985.
13.
Jarrett, R. D., “Evaluation of the Slope‐Area Methods of Computing Peak Discharge,” Proceedings, U.S.‐China Bilateral Symposium on the Analysis of Extraordinary Flood Events, Nanjing, China, Oct., 1985.
14.
Kawas, M. L., and Herd, K. R., “A Radar‐Based Stochastic Model for Short‐Time Increment Rainfall,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 9, 1985, pp. 1437–1455.
15.
Kite, G. W., “Frequency and Risk Analysis in Hydrology,” Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colo., 1977.
16.
Klemes, V., “Unreliability of Reliability Estimates of Storage Reservoir Performance Based on Short Streamflow Records,” Reliability in Water Resources Management, Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colo., 1979, pp. 193–205.
17.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Burges, S. J., “Reliability Measures for Water Supply Reservoirs and the Significance of Long‐Term Persistence,” Proceedings, International Symposium on Real‐Time Operation of Hydrosystems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Jun., 1981.
18.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Potter, K. W., “Testing Flood Frequency Estimation Methods Using a Regional Flood Generation Model,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 12, Dec., 1985, pp. 1903–1914.
19.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Wallis, J. R., and Wood, E. F., “Effect of Regional Heterogeneity on Flood Frequency Estimation,” in press, Water Resources Research, 1986.
20.
McLeod, A. I., and Hipel, K. W., “Simulation Procedures for Box‐Jenkins Models,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, Oct., 1978, pp. 969–975.
21.
National Research Council, “Safety of Existing Dams: Evaluation and Improvement,” (R. B. Jansen, Ed.), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1983.
22.
National Research Council, “Safety of Dams: Flood and Earthquake Criteria,” G. W. Housner, Ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1985.
23.
Slack, J. R., Wallis, J. R., and Matalas, N. C., “On the Value of Information for Flood Frequency Analysis,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 5, Oct., 1975, pp. 629–647.
24.
Stedinger, J. R., and Cohn, T. A., “Flood Frequency Analysis with Historical and Paleoflood Information,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 22, No. 5, May, 1986, pp. 785–793.
25.
Stedinger, J. R., and Grygier, J., “Risk‐Cost Analysis and Spillway Design,” paper presented at Conference on Computer Applications in Water Resources, Buffalo, N.Y., Jun., 1985.
26.
Stedinger, J. R., Pei, D., and Cohn, T. A., “A Condensed Disaggregation Model for Incorporating Parameter Uncertainty into Monthly Reservoir Simulations,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 5, May, 1985, pp. 665–675.
27.
Stewart, J. E., and Bodhaine, G. L., “Floods in the Skagit River, Washington,” U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper No. 1527, 1961.
28.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Criteria for Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Storage Dams,” ACER Technical Memo No. 1, 1981a.
29.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Freeboard Criteria and Guidelines for Computing Freeboard Criteria Allowances for Storage Dams,” ACER Technical Memo No. 2, 1981b.
30.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Design Basis Flood for Nuclear Power Plants,” Regulatory Guide 1.59, Rev. 2, 1977.
31.
U.S. Water Resources Council, “Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency,” Bulletin 17A of the Hydrology Subcommittee, 1977.
32.
Vicens, G. J., Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I., and Schaake, J. C., “Bayesian Generation of Synthetic Streamflows,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 6, Dec., 1975, pp. 827–838.
33.
Wall, I. B., “Probabilistic Assessment of Flooding Hazard for Nuclear Power Plants,” Nuclear Safety, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1974, pp. 399–408.
34.
Wallis, J. R., “Risk and Uncertainties in the Evaluation of Flood Events for the Design of Hydraulic Structures,” Piene e Siccita, E. Guggino, G. Rossi, and Todini, Eds., Fondazine Politechnica del Mediterraneo Catania, Erice, Italy, 1980.
35.
Waymire, E., Gupta, V. K., and Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I., “A Spectral Theory of Rainfall Intensity at the Meso‐B Scale,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 20, No. 10, Oct., 1984, pp. 1453–1465.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 113 • Issue 8 • August 1987
Pages: 1041 - 1051
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1987
Published in print: Aug 1987
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.