Modeling of Sinkholes in Weakly Cemented Sand
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 12
Abstract
Sinkhole development in a profile with a weakly cemented sand overlain by an uncemented sand and underlain by a karst limestone was studied using 51 reduced-scale stress-correct centrifuge models. The interaction between the thickness ( H c ), cohesive strength ( c ), and unit weight (γc) of the cemented sand layer; the thickness ( H s ) and unit weight (γs) of the uncemented sand overburden; and the diameter ( D ) of the cavity in the underlying karst formation was examined. Collapse of the cemented sand layer into the underlying opening was observed to occur either as a breakthrough plug with steeply inclined sides at an average angle of 61° to the horizontal or as a dome fallout that left behind a stable arch. The type of failure depended on the model geometry, described by H c /D. A dimensionless design chart was developed to predict failure, relating N γcH c/c to H c /D for configurations without uncemented sand overburden. The overburden pressure over the cavity at collapse was less than the geostatic overburden pressure. The fraction of full geostatic stress decreased with increasing overburden depth relative to the size of the cavity opening and approached an asymptotic value of about 5%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abdulla, W. A. (1995). “Centrifuge modeling of sinkhole development in weakly cemented sand,” PhD dissertation, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
2.
Ahmed, M. (1990). “A study of possible failure mechanisms for mining-induced seismicity in Saskatchewan,” PhD thesis, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
3.
Allman, M. A., and Poulos, H. G. (1988). “Stress-strain behavior of an artificially cemented calcareous soil.”Proc., Conf. on Engrg. for Calcareous Sediments, Australia, 51–60.
4.
Al-Rifaiy, A.(1990). “Land subsidence in the Al-Dahr residential area in Kuwait: a case history study.”Quarterly J., Engrg. Geol., London, England, 23, 337–346.
5.
Atkinson, J. H., and Potts, D. M.(1977). “Stability of a shallow circular tunnel in cohesionless soil.”Geotechnique, London, England, 27(2), 204–215.
6.
Brady, B. H., and Brown, E. T. (1985). Rock mechanics for underground mining . George Allen and Unwin, London, England.
7.
Craig, W. H.(1990). “Collapse of cohesive overburden following removal of support.”Canadian Geotech. J., 27(3), 355–364.
8.
Eid, W. K. (1987). “Scaling effect in cone penetration testing,” PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va.
9.
Fischer, J. A., Greene, R. W., Ottoson, R. W., and Graham, T. C. (1987). “Planning & design considerations in Karst terrain.”Proc., 2nd Multidisciplinary Conf. on Sinkholes and the Envir. Impact of Karst, Orlando, Fla., 323–329.
10.
Mair, R. J., Philips, R., Schofield, A. N., and Taylor, R. N. (1984). “Application of centrifuge modeling to the design of tunnels and excavations in soft clay.”Proc., Symp. on Application of Centrifuge Modeling to Geotech. Des., Univ. of Manchester, Manchester, England, 357–380.
11.
Mitchell, J. K. (1976). “The properties of cement-stabilized soils.”Proc., Workshop on Mat. and Methods for Low Cost Road, Rail, and Reclamation Work, Leura, Australia, 365–404.
12.
Ono, K., and Yamada, M.(1993). “Analysis of the arching in granular mass.”Geotechnique, London, England, 43(1), 105–120.
13.
Rad, N. S., and Clough, G. W. (1982). “The influence of cementation on the static and dynamic behavior of sand.”Rep. No. 59, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engrg. Ctr., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
14.
Rad, N. S., and Tumay, M. T.(1986). “Effect of cementation on the cone penetration resistance of sand: a model study.”ASTM Geotech. Testing J., 9, 117–125.
15.
Sitar, N., Clough, G. W., and Bachus, R. C. (1980). “Behavior weakly cemented soil slopes under static and seismic loading conditions.”Rep. No. 44, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engrg. Ctr., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
16.
“Standard test methods for maximum index density of soils using a vibratory table.” (1983a). Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 04.08, D-4253, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 554–565.
17.
“Standard test methods for minimum index density of soils and calculation of relative density.” (1983b). Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 04.08, D-4254, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 566–572.
18.
“Standard test methods for specific gravity and absorption of fine aggregate.” (1988). Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 04.08, D-128, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 68–71.
19.
Sterling, R. L. (1977). “Roof design for underground openings in near-surface bedded rock formations,” PhD thesis, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.
20.
Sutherland, H. J., Schuler, K. W., and Benzley, S. G.(1983). “Numerical and physical simulations of strata movement above idealized mine structures.”In Situ, 7, 87–113.
21.
Sutherland, H. B.(1988). “Uplift resistance of soils.”Geotechnique, London, England, 38(4), 493–516.
22.
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil mechanics . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
23.
Thigpen, L. (1984). “On the mechanics of strata collapse above underground openings.” Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab., Livermore, Calif.
24.
Wright, F. D., and Bucky, P. B.(1948). “Determination of room and pillar dimensions for the oil-shale mine at Rifle, Colorado.”Trans. Am. Inst. of Min. and Metallurgical Engrg., 108, 352–359.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 12 • December 1996
Pages: 998 - 1005
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1996
Published in print: Dec 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.