Correlations Between Simple Field Test and Relative Density-Test Values
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 10
Abstract
Correlations developed between a simple field test, a 1 point standard Proctor test on air-dry sand, and relative density-test values are presented for 29 filter sands studied. The correlations allow prediction of 70 and 50% relative density values from the field 1 point compaction test value. The field 1 point standard Proctor dry-density value on air-dry sand was greater than the 50% relative density value for all 29 sands tested.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burmeister, D. M.(1948). “Suggested methods of test for maximum and minimum densities of granular soils.”Am. Soc. Testing Mat., 48, 1249.
2.
Poulos, S. J.(1988). “Compaction control and the index unit weight.”Geotech. Testing J., 11(2), 100–108.
3.
Tavenas, F. A., Ladd, R. S., and LaRochelle, P. (1973). “Accuracy of relative density measurements: results of a comparative test program.”Evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils, ASTM STP 523, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 18–60.
4.
Townsend, F. C. (1973). “Comparisons of vibrated density and standard compaction tests on sands with varying amounts of fines.”Evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils, ASTM STP 523, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 348–363.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1996
Published in print: Oct 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.