Continuum versus Structural Approach to Stability of Reinforced Soil
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 2
Abstract
Two techniques for stability analysis of reinforced soil structures are presented. In the first one, called the continuum approach here, the reinforced soil is first homogenized, and the slip-line method is used to find the limit stress field in an anisotropic continuum. The second, structural approach, considers reinforcement and granular fill as two separate structural components, and the kinematical method of limit analysis is used as the technique of solution. The solutions to critical heights of reinforced slopes are presented as an illustrative example for application of the described techniques. The structural approach proposed here has a clear theoretical interpretation, is easily applicable to any failure patterns, and can be modified to accommodate the nonassociative flow rule for soils. The continuum approach with the slip-line method of solution for stresses was found to be more restrictive and less convenient than the structural approach. The continuum approach is expected to have a wider application, however, in analysis of earth structures with less conventional reinforcements such as continuous filament or for fiber-reinforced soils.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anthoine, A. (1989). “Mixed modeling of reinforced soils within the framework of the yield design theory.”Comp. and Geotechnics, 7(1&2), 67–82.
2.
Bathurst, R. J., and Benjamin, D. J. (1990). “Failure of a geogrid-reinforced soil wall.”Transp. Res. Rec. 1288, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 109–116.
3.
Booker, J. R., and Davis, E. H.(1972). “A general treatment of plastic anisotropy under conditions of plane strain.”J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 20(4), 239–250.
4.
de Buhan, P., Mangiavacchi, R., Nova, R., Pellegrini, G., and Salençon, J.(1989). “Yield design of reinforced earth walls by homogenization method.”Géotechnique, London, England, 39(2), 189–201.
5.
de Buhan, P., and Siad, L. (1989). “Influence of a soil-strip interface failure condition on the yield-strength of reinforced earth.”Comp. and Geotechnics, 7(1&2), 3–18.
6.
De Buhan, P., and Taliercio, A.(1991). “A homogenization approach to the yield strength of composite materials.”Eur. J. Mech., Ser. A/Solids, Montrouge, France, 10(2), 129–154.
7.
Collins, I. F.(1974). “A note on the interpretation of Coulomb's analysis of the thrust on a rough retaining wall in terms of the limit theorems of plasticity theory.”Géotechnique, London, England, 24, 106–108.
8.
Drescher, A., and Detournay, E.(1993). “Limit load in translational failure mechanisms for associative and non-associative materials.”Géotechnique, London, England, 43, 443–456.
9.
Jewell, R. A. (1990). “Revised design charts for steep reinforced slopes. Reinforced embankmanets, theory and practice, Thomas Telford, London, England, 1–30.
10.
Leshchinsky, D., and Volk, J. C. (1985). “Stability charts for geotextile-reinforced walls.”Transp. Res. Rec. 1131, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 5–16.
11.
McLaughlin, P. V., and Batterman, S. C.(1970). “Limit behavior of fibrous materials.”Int. J. Solids Struct., 6(10), 1357–1376.
12.
Michalowski, R. L.(1989). “Three-dimensional analysis of locally loaded slopes.”Géotechnique, London, England, 39(1), 27–38.
13.
Michalowski, R. L. (1992). “Stability of embankments over weak soils of limited thickness.”Grouting, soil improvement and geosynthetics, Vol. 2, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1142–1152.
14.
Michalowski, R. L., and Zhao, A. (1993). “Failure criteria for homogenized reinforced soils and application in limit analysis of slopes. ”Proc., Geosynthetics '93, Vol. 1, Industrial Fabrics Association Int., St. Paul, Minn., 443–453.
15.
Michalowski, R. L., and Zhao, A. (1994). “Limit loads on fiber-reinforced earth structures.”Proc., XIII ICSMFE, Balkema, Rotterdam, Vol. 2, 809–812.
16.
Mróz, Z., and Drescher, A.(1969). “Limit plasticity approach to some caes of flow of bulk solids.”J. Engrg. for Industry, Trans. ASME, 91(2), 357–364.
17.
Romstad, K. M., Hermann, L. R., and Shen, C. K.(1976). “Integrated study of reinforced earth—I: theoretical formulation.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 102(5), 457–471.
18.
Salençon, J.(1990). “An introduction to the yield design theory and its applications to soil mechanics.”Eur. J. Mech., Ser. A/Solids, 9(5), 477–500.
19.
Sawicki, A.(1983). “Plastic limit behavior of reinforced earth.”J. Geotch. Engrg., ASCE, 109(7), 1000–1005.
20.
Sawicki, A., and Leśniewska, D. (1989). “Limit analysis of cohesive slopes reinforced with geotextiles.”Comp. and Geotechnics, 71(1&2), 53–66.
21.
Schmertmann, G. R., Chourery-Curtis, V. E., Johnson, R. D., and Bonaparte, R. (1987). “Design charts for geogrid-reinforced soil slopes.”Proc., Geosynthetics `87, Vol. 1, Industrial Fabrics Association Int., St. Paul, Minn., 108–120.
22.
Sokolovskii, V. V. (1965). Statics of granular media . Pergamon Press, New York, N.Y.
23.
Wu, J. T. H. (1992). “Predicting performance of the Denver walls: general report.”Proc., Int. Symp. Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls, J. T. H. Wu, ed., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 3–20.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 121 • Issue 2 • February 1995
Pages: 152 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1995
Published in print: Feb 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.