Influence of Structure and Composition on Residual Soils
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 4
Abstract
The various formation factors responsible for differences in behavior between residual soils and sedimentary (transported) soils are described. The extent to which classical soil mechanics concepts derived from the study of sedimentary soils are applicable to residual soils is examined and discussed. It is shown that residual soils can be wrongly evaluated as problem soils simply because some aspects of their behavior do not conform to that of sedimentary soil. The relative importance of composition and structure in influencing residual soil behavior is examined by carrying out consolidation and triaxial tests on three residual soils, namely, a silt, a tropical red clay, and an andosol (volcanic ash soil). The need for an empirical or theoretical framework applicable to residual soils, in place of the stress history framework used with sedimentary soils, is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bishop, A. W., Webb, D. L., and Lewin, P. I. (1965). “Undisturbed samples of clay from the Ashford common shaft: Strength‐effective stress relationships.” Geo‐technique, 15(1), 1–31.
2.
Beckman, J. M. (1933). “De Dam Sitoe Tjipanundjang.” De Ingenieur, Feb. 1934 (in Dutch).
3.
Bjerrum, L. (1967a). “Engineering geology of Norwegian normally consolidated marine clays as related to settlements of buildings.” Geotechnique, 27(2), 83–117.
4.
Bjerrum, L. (1967b). “Progressive failure in slopes of overconsolidated plastic clay and clay shales.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 93(5), 3–49.
5.
Brouwer, A. R. H. (1934). “De Dam Sitoe Tjileuntja.” De Ingenieur, Feb. 1934 (in Dutch).
6.
De Vos, C. P. (1932). “Dam Tjipanundjang.” Openbare Werken, Jan. 1932, 19‐21 (in Dutch).
7.
Gidigasu, M. D., and Bani, S. K. (1973). “Geotechnical characteristics of troublesome lateritic materials.” Proc. 8th Intl. Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 4, 89–96.
8.
Harvey, C. C., Riley, P. B., and Pickens, G. A. (1982). “Problems associated with the shrinkage of Auckland clays.”Presented to Auckland Branch of New Zealand Geomechanics Society. N. Z. Geomech. News, Nov. 1982.
9.
Mitchell, J. K., and Sitar, N. (1982). “Engineering properties of tropical residual soils.” ASCE Geotech. Engrg. Specialty Conference on Engineering and Construction in Tropical and Residual Soils, Hawaii, 1982, 30–57.
10.
Morin, W. J., and Todor, P. C. (1975). “Laterite and lateritic soils and other problem soils of the tropics.” USAID 3682, Lyon Associates, Baltimore, Md.
11.
Morin, W. J. (1982). “Characteristics of tropical red residual soils.” ASCE Geotech. Engrg. Specialty Conference on Engineering and Construction in Tropical and Residual Soils, Hawaii, 1982, 172–198.
12.
Terzaghi, K. (1958). “Design and performance of Sasamua Dam.” Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, 9, 369–394.
13.
Vaughan, P. R. (1985). “Mechanical and hydraulic properties of in situ residual soils.” Proc. First Intl. Conference on Geomechanics in Tropical Lateritic and Saprolitic Soils, Brazil, 1–33.
14.
Wesley, L. D. (1973). “Some basic engineering properties of halloysite and allo‐phane clays in Java, Indonesia.” Geotechnique, 23(4), 471–494.
15.
Wesley, L. D. (1974). “Tjipanundjang Dam in West Java, Indonesia.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 100(5), 503–522.
16.
Wesley, L. D. (1977). “Shear strength properties of halloysite and allophane clays in Java, Indonesia.” Geotechnique, 27(2), 125–136.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1990
Published in print: Apr 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.