Uncertainty in Dynamic Anisotropic Strength of Sand
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 113, Issue 5
Abstract
A statistical model is proposed here to estimate the in situ anistropic cyclic shear strength of a saturated sand deposit. Triaxial test results are used to develop the basic model; it is then modified for in situ conditions considering all the factors affecting laboratory testing conditions as well as in situ conditions, i.e., mean grain size, overconsolidation ratio, multidirectional shaking, uniform cyclic loads, and secondary factors. A comparison is made between the anistropic and isotropic shear strengths. Using these strengths, the risks of liquefaction are estimated. It is observed that neglecting the presence of structures will always give a higher probability of liquefaction. The difference between the two cases is significant for shallower depths. The difference increases as the anistropic stress ratio, Kc, increases. A considerable amount of uncertainty is expected in the estimation of the in situ anistropic cyclic shear strength. The uncertainty associated with the in situ relative density contributes significantly to the overall uncertainty. The effect of the anistropic stress ratio as well as the uncertainty associated with this estimation need to be considered in any rational method for evaluating the susceptibility of a saturated sand deposit subjected to earthquake loadings.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chang, C. S., Kuo, C. L., and Selig, E. T., “Pore Pressure Development During Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. GT1, Jan., 1983, pp. 103–107.
2.
Finn, W. D. L., et al., “Cyclic Pore Presssure Under Anisotropic Conditions,” Proceedings, Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Special Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Vol. 1, Jun., 1978, pp. 457–471.
3.
Haldar, A., and Miller, F. J., “Statistical Evaluation of Cyclic Strength of Sand,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 12, Dec., 1984, pp. 1785–1802.
4.
Haldar, A., and Tang, W. H., “Probabilistic Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 105, No. GT2, Feb., 1979, pp. 145–163.
5.
Hedberg, J., “Cyclic Stress‐Strain Behavior of Sand in Offshore Environment,” thesis presented to Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1977, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
6.
Selig, E. T., and Chang, C. S., “Soil Failure Modes in Undrained Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, May, 1981, pp. 539–551.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1987
Published in print: May 1987
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.