Self‐Boring Pressuremeter Tests In Soft Clay
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 112, Issue 1
Abstract
The basic objective of a self‐boring pressuremeter (SBPM) test is to insert a cylindrical probe into the ground with a minimum of disturbance and expand the membrane covering the probe so as to load the soil to failure. The test data from the expansion phase allows the determination of lateral earth pressure, shear strength, stress‐strain behavior, and, in some cases, coefficient of consolidation. In spite of its considerable potential, as more investigators have utilized the SBPM, inconsistencies have been reported in the test results. To help resolve some of the uncertainties, 32 SBPM tests were conducted in soft San Francisco Bay Mud wherein key parameters were varied one at a time to isolate their influence. The parameters considered included: expansion rate, cutter position, cutting rate, and cutting shoe dimension. Furthermore, a microcomputer data acquisition system and loading technique were developed that allowed the test to be carried out automatically while recording a high density of data. The results of this study indicate that disturbance is the factor that has the greatest influence on the interpreted results from the SBPM test.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Benoit, J., “Analysis of Self‐Boring Pressuremeter Tests in Soft Clay,” thesis presented to Stanford Univ., at Stanford, CA, in 1983, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
2.
Bonaparte, R., and Mitchell, J. K., “The Properties of San Francisco Bay Mud at Hamilton Air Force Base, California,” Department of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA, Apr., 1979.
3.
Carter, J. P., Randolph, M. F., and Wroth, C. P., “Stress and Pore Pressure Changes in Clay During and After the Expansion of a Cylindrical Cavity,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 3, 1979, pp. 305–322.
4.
Clarke, B. G., Carter, J. P., and Wroth, C. P., “In‐Situ Determination of the Consolidation Characteristics of Saturated Clays,” Proceedings, 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Brighton, Vol. 2, 1979, pp. 207–213.
5.
Clough, G. W., and Denby, G. M., “Self‐Boring Pressuremeter Study on San Francisco Bay Mud,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. GT1, Jan., 1980, pp. 45–63.
6.
Dalton, J. C. P., and Hawkins, P. G., “Fields of Stress—Some Measurements of the In‐Situ Stress in a Meadow in the Cambridgeshire Countryside,” Ground Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, May, 1982.
7.
Denby, G. M., “Self‐Boring Pressuremeter Study of the San Francisco Bay Mud,” thesis presented to Stanford Univ., at Stanford, CA, in 1978, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
8.
Duncan, J. M., “The Effect of Anisotropy and Reorientation of Principal Stresses on the Shear Strength of Saturated Clays,” thesis presented to the Univ. of California, at Berkeley, CA, in 1965, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
9.
Hughes, J. M. O., “An Instrument for In Situ Measurement of the Properties of Soft Clays,” thesis presented to the Univ. of Cambridge, at Cambridge, England, in 1973, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
10.
Hughes, J. M. O., Ervin, M. C., Holden, J. C., and Harvey, R. J., “Determination of the Engineering Properties of the Coode Island Silts Using a Self‐Boring Pressuremeter,” Proceedings, 3rd Australian‐New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, Vol. 1, Wellington, New Zealand, 1980, pp. 249–254.
11.
Jain, S. K., “Analysis of the Pressuremeter Test by FEM Formulation with Elasto‐Plastic Consolidation,” thesis presented to the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., at Blacksburg, VA, in 1984, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
12.
Jaky, J., “The Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest,” Journal for Society of Hungarian Architects and Engineers, Budapest, Hungary, Oct., 1944, pp. 355–358.
13.
Lacerda, W. J., “Stress Relaxation and Creep Effects on the Deformation of Soils,” thesis presented to the Univ. of California, at Berkeley, CA, in 1976, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
14.
Ladd, C. C., and Foott, R., “New Design Procedures for the Stability of Soft Clays,” Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. GT7, July, 1974, pp. 673–786.
15.
Law, K. T., and Eden, W. J., “Influence of Cutting Shoe Size in Self‐Boring Pressuremeter Tests in Sensitive Clays,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 17, 1980, pp. 165–173.
16.
Mayne, P. W., and Kulhawy, F. H., “‐OCR Relationships in Soil,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. GT6, June, 1982, pp. 851–872.
17.
Randolph, M. F., and Wroth, C. P., “An Analytical Solution for the Consolidation Around a Driven Pile,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 3, July–Sept., 1979, pp. 217–229.
18.
Sinram, A., “Cubical Shear Box Tests Designed to Simulate Pressuremeter Loading,” thesis to be presented to Stanford Univ., at Stanford, CA, in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science.
19.
Skempton, A. W., “The Pore Pressure Coefficients A and B,” Geotechnique, Vol. 4, No. 4, Dec., 1954.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 112 • Issue 1 • January 1986
Pages: 60 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1986
Published in print: Jan 1986
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.