Modulus of Subgrade Reaction: New Perspective
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 109, Issue 12
Abstract
A review of the current state-of-the-art concerning the use of the modulus of subgrade reaction (Winkler) model indicates that there is considerable disagreement concerning the correct method for interpreting and evaluating the modulus of subgrade reaction, k. Extension of previous work, which used the simplified continuum approach to solve a problem in the theory of elasticity, shows that the Winkler subgrade model actually defines an elastic body of finite thickness in which all stress and strain components are assumed to be zero except for the vertical normal stress and strain. Furthermore, the modulus of subgrade reaction, k, is defined explicitly to be a function of the Young's modulus and thickness of the elastic body. Solutions for a Young's modulus that is constant with depth, as well as one that varies linearly and with the square root of depth, are presented. Although the simplified continuum approach offers an analytically rigorous and consistent method for evaluating the modulus of subgrade reaction, the more important result is that the very crude stress and strain assumptions implicit in the Winkler model are identified for the first time.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Design Manual—Soil Mechanics, Foundations and Earth Structures, NAVFAC DM‐7, Department of the Navy, Mar., 1971.
2.
Duncan, J. M., and Chang, C. Y., “Nonlinear Analysis of Stress and Strain in Soils,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM5, Proc. Paper 7510, Sept., 1970, pp. 1629–1653.
3.
Horvath, J. S., “A Study of Analytical Methods for Determining the Response of Mat Foundations to Static Loads,” thesis presented to the Polytechnic Institute of New York at Brooklyn, N. Y., in 1979, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
4.
Horvath, J. S., “New Subgrade Model Applied to Mat Foundations,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 12, Paper 18437, Dec., 1983, pp. 1567–1587.
5.
Horvath, J. S., “Historical Review of Subgrade Models,” Geotechnique (in press).
6.
Reissner, E., “A Note on Deflections of Plates on a Viscoelastic Foundation,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 25, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 80, 1958, pp. 144–145.
7.
Schmertmann, J. H., “Static Cone to Compute Static Settlement Over Sand,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM3, Proc. Paper 7302, May, 1970, pp. 1011–1043.
8.
Schmertmann, J. H., Hartman, J. P., and Brown, P. R., “Improved Strain Influence Factor Diagrams,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. GT8, Proc. Paper 13915, Aug., 1978, pp. 1131–1135.
9.
Terzaghi, K., “Evaluation of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction,” Geotechnique, Vol. 5, No. 4, Dec., 1955, pp. 297–326.
10.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N., Theory of Elasticity, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., 3rd ed., 1970.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 109 • Issue 12 • December 1983
Pages: 1591 - 1596
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1983
Published in print: Dec 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.