Measurement Techniques for Estimating Local and Total Duct Leakages in Residential Buildings
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 1
Abstract
The paper proposes two measurement techniques for estimating the duct leakage in residential buildings. The first technique determines the “local” leakages using commercially available zone bags and it is called the zone bag-based measurement technique. Zone bags are used to block the flow of air in ducts so that portions of the duct can be isolated and pressurized separately to measure the respective leakages. The thrust of this technique is to locate where these potential leaks are in the duct system and try to provide more cost effective ways to remedy those leaks than what is available currently. The other technique determines the “total” supply and return leakages using a simple model and it is called the model-based measurement technique. The model is based on pressure drop measurements between the return and supply sides. The proposed techniques were evaluated and validated at the air duct leakage laboratory which has two different air duct configurations and a wide range of leakage levels controlled by holes created at several locations of ductwork. Experimental results indicate that the zone bag-based measurement technique estimates the local leakage accurately with a mean absolute difference of 0.26% of total air-handler flow compared to the baseline. It can be inferred that this method gives a better estimate of the total leakage based on the location of the leak than the duct pressurization method that uses the half plenum pressure technique. The results also show that the model-based measurement technique is a good alternative when one cannot use a physical barrier between the return and supply sides. It was found that the total supply or return side leakage was estimated with a mean absolute difference of 0.6% compared to the baseline technique. The future research step is field testing techniques to examine how one can more efficiently sample the duct system by judicially sectioning off the duct at a few points to obtain localized leakage information and obtain enough information to correct leak problems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers acknowledge the financial support of the National Center for Energy Management and Building Technologies (NCEMBT) through funding from the DOE under Cooperative Agreement No. DOEDE-FC26-03GO13072.
References
American National Standards Institute/American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ANSI/ASHRAE). (2004). “Method of test for determining the design and seasonal efficiencies of residential thermal distribution systems.” ANSI/ASHRAE 152-2004, New York.
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers Inc. (ASHRAE). (2005). ASHRAE handbook-HVAC fundamentals, Chap. 14, New York.
Dickerhoff, D., Walker, I., and Sherman, M. (2004). “Validation and improving the Delta Q duct leakage test.” ASHRAE Trans., 110(2), 741–751.
Francisco, P. W., and Palmiter, L. (2000). “Field validation of standard 152P.” ASHRAE Trans., 106(2), 771–783.
Francisco, P. W., and Palmiter, L. (2001). “The nulling test: A new measurement technique for estimating duct leakage in residential homes.” ASHRAE Trans., 107(1), 297–303.
Francisco, P. W., Palmiter, L., and Davis, B. (2003). “Insights into improved ways to measure residential duct leakage.” ASHRAE Trans., 109(1), 485–740.
Francisco, P. W., Palmiter, L., Kruse, E., and Davis, B. (2004). “Evaluation of two new duct leakage measurement methods in 51 homes.” ASHRAE Trans., 110(2), 727–740.
Parker, D., Fairey, P., and Gu, L. (1993). “Simulation of the effects of duct leakage and heat transfer on residential space-cooling energy use.” Energy Build., 20(2), 97–114.
Sherman, M. H., and Walker, I. S. (1998). “Can duct-tape take the heat?” Home Energy Magazine, 14(4), 14–19.
Sherman, M. H., and Walker, I. S. (2003). “Advanced duct sealant testing.” LBNL Rep. No. 53547, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Siegel, J., McWilliams, J., and Walker, I. S. (2003). “Comparison between predicted duct effectiveness from proposed ASHRAE standard 152P and measured field data for residential forced air cooling systems.” ASHRAE Trans., 109, 503–512.
Walker, I. S., and Sherman, M. H. (2005). “Duct tape and sealant performance.” LBNL Rep. No. 57225, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Walker, I. S., Sherman, M. H., and Dickerhoff, D. J. (2004). “Reducing uncertainty for the Delta Q duct leakage test.” LBNL Rep. No. 53549, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Walker, I. S., Sherman, M. H., Wempen, J., Wang, D., and Dickerhoff, D. J. (2001). “Development of a new duct leakage test: Delta Q.” LBNL Rep. No. 47308, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 135 • Issue 1 • March 2009
Pages: 3 - 11
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 25, 2007
Accepted: Sep 26, 2008
Published online: Mar 1, 2009
Published in print: Mar 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.