Comparing Options for Improving Dissolved Oxygen Below Hydropower Dam
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 2
Abstract
Many existing dams will have to address issues of minimum dissolved oxygen concentration and minimum flow before they can be relicensed. All new hydropower applications also must address such issues. Although technology has been developed to reaerate hydropower releases, trade‐offs exist between oxygen levels in the release and the minimum flow provided in relation to downstream assimilative capacity. A case history beginning with the development of the aeration technology followed by the analysis of the impacts of increased dissolved oxygen concentration and river flow on assimilative capacity is presented. Testing of both in‐reservoir oxygen injection systems and turbine aeration systems is described. A modified Streeter‐Phelps model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of aerating the releases and increasing the minimum flows from the dam. The effects of reducing municipal and industrial waste load on dissolved oxygen concentration were also compared to the effects of aerating the releases and changing minimum river flow. For this particular case, increasing minimum flows was found to be one of the most attractive alternatives for increasing the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration predicted in the river.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Churchill, M. A., Elmore, H. L., and Buckingham, R. A. (1962). “The prediction of stream reaeration rates.” J. Sanitary Engrg. Div., ASCE, 88(3), 1–46.
2.
Exploratory study of improving dissolved oxygen concentrations in the Holston River near Kinsport, Tennessee. (1985). Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.
3.
Fain, T. G. (1978). “Evaluation of small‐pore diffuser technique for reoxygenation of turbine releases at Fort Patrick Henry Dam.” WR28‐1‐32‐100, Div. of Water Resour., Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, Tenn.
4.
“Feasibility report, Tims Ford/Elk River minimum flows.” (1985). TVA/ONR/A&WR‐85/22, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tenn.
5.
Goronflo, H. M., and Adams, J. S. (1987). “Providing minimum flows below hydropower projects.” Proc. CE Workshop on Reservoir Releases (Miscellaneous Paper E‐87‐3, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
6.
Harshbarger, E. D. (1984). “Aeration of Boone unit 2 discharges using air blowers, summer and fall of 1983.” WR 28‐1‐31‐101, Div. of Air and Water Resour., Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, Tenn.
7.
Harshbarger, E. D. (1985a). “Boone aeration tests September 1984.” WR 28‐1‐31‐103, Div. of Air and Water Resour., Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, Tenn.
8.
Harshbarger, E. D. (1985b). “Aeration tests at Tims Ford Dam using a centrifugal blower.” WR 28‐2‐75‐102, Div. of Air and Water Resour., Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, Tenn.
9.
Hauser, G. E., and Ruane, R. J. (1985). “Model exploration of Holston River water quality improvement strategies.” WR28‐1‐590‐109, TVA/ONRED/WQS‐84/1, Office of Natural Resour. and Economic Devel., Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, Tenn.
10.
Hesse, M. O. (1987). “Remarks by FERC chairman Martha O. Hesse.” Waterpower '87, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
11.
“Holston River study.” (1978). Appendix E, EPA 904/9‐78‐019, Appendix E, U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Region 4, Atlanta, Ga.
12.
“Improving reservoir releases.” (1983). TVA/ONR/WR‐83/10, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tenn.
13.
“Improving reservoir releases.” (1984). A&WR‐84/27, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tenn.
14.
“Improving reservoir releases.” (1987). TVA/ONR/A&WR‐87/33, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tenn.
15.
Iwanski, M. L., et al. (1980). Factors affecting water quality in Cherokee Reservoir. Div. of Water Resour., Tennessee Valley Authority, Chattanooga, Tenn.
16.
Kissel, P. C. (1988). “The new environmental requirements of ECPA.” Alternative sources of energy.
17.
Krenkel, P. A., and Novotny, B. (1979). “River water quality model construction.” Modeling of rivers, H. W. Shen, ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
18.
Krenkel, P. A., and Ruane, R. J. (1979). “Basic approach to water quality modeling.” Modeling of rivers, H. W. Shen, ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
19.
Nicholas, W. R., and Ruane, R. J. (1979). “Investigation of oxygen injection using small‐bubble diffusers at Fort Patrick Henry Dam.” Proc. Symp. on Reaeration Res., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
20.
O'Connor, D. J., and DiToro, D. M. (1970). “Photosynthesis and the diurnal dissolved oxygen variation in streams.” J. Sanitary Engrg. Div., ASCE, 96(2), 547–572.
21.
O'Connor, D. J., and Dobbins, W. E. (1958). “The mechanism of reaeration in natural streams.” Trans., ASCE, 123, 641.
22.
Placke, J. P. (1983). “Tropic status evaluation of TVA reservoirs.” TVA/ONR/WR‐83/7, Div. of Air and Water Resour., Tennessee Valley Authority, Chattanooga, Tenn.
23.
Streeter, H. W., and Phelps, E. B. (1925). “A study on the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio River, III.” Public Health Bulletin No. 146, U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.
24.
Tsivoglou, E. C., and Neal, L. A. (1976). “Tracer measurement of reaeration. III. Predicting the reaeration capacity of inland streams.” J. WPCF, 48, 2669.
25.
Water quality management plan for the Holston River basin. (1978). Tennessee Dept. of Public Health, Nashville, Tenn.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 115 • Issue 2 • August 1989
Pages: 63 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1989
Published in print: Aug 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.