Comparing Pulsing Classifiers for Waste‐to‐Energy
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 112, Issue 1
Abstract
Field experience with air classifiers in waste‐to‐energy has indicated the need for redesign. Previous work indicates a heed to achieve separation based more on density and less on aerodynamic characteristics than is possible with current classifier technology. The development of the concept and theory of pulsed‐flow air classification are summarized. Methodology and equipment for testing various air classifiers are described. Laboratory experimentation shows that pulsed‐flow air classification is capable of superior separations by density than conventional classifiers. Comparisons with other types of air classifiers, including passive pulsing classifiers, show the active pulsed‐flow air classifier to be superior. Continuous‐feed comparison testing with a conventional zigzag classifier shows the superiority of the active pulsed‐flow system both in terms of separation efficiency and operational considerations, which are extensively discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Connor, H. S., and Smith, M. L., “Recycling of Glass and Metals: Container Materials,” Recycling and Disposal of Solid Wastes, T. F. Yen, Ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, 1974.
2.
Equipment Tests and Evaluations, Vol. II of Study of Processing Equipment for Resource Recovery Systems, Midwest Research Institute, Cincinnati, OH, US Environmental Protection Agency, Dec., 1978.
3.
Fourth Report to Congress: Resource Recovery and Waste Reduction, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1977.
4.
Henrikson, R. A., A Descriptive Mathematical Model of Air Classification, Duke Environmental Center, Durham, NC, 1979.
5.
McNabb, M. B., Fundamental Aspects of Air Classifier Operation and Design: A New Test for Evaluation of Air Classifier Performance, Duke Environmental Center, Durham, NC, Oct., 1980.
6.
Niessen, W. R., “Properties of Waste Materials,” Handbook of Solid Waste Management, D. G. Wilson, Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1977.
7.
Peirce, J. J., and Wittenberg, N., “Zigzag Configurations and Air Classifier Performance,” Journal of Energy Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 1, Mar., 1984, pp. 36–48.
8.
Peirce, J. J., Stessel, R. I., and Vesilind, P. A., “Quantifying the Performance of N‐Way Separators,” Resources and Conservation, Vol. 10, 1983, pp. 243–247.
9.
Resource Recovery from Municipal Solid Waste, National Center for Resource Recovery, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1975.
10.
Senden, M. M. G., “Performance of Zig Zag Air Classifiers at Low Particle Concentrations,” dissertation presented to Eindhoven Univ. of Technology, at Eindhoven, The Netherlands, in 1978, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Engineering.
11.
Specifications for Magnetic Separation Systems, Teledyne National, Northridge, CA.
12.
Stessel, R. I., “Pulsed Flow Air Classification,” dissertation presented to Duke Univ., at Durham, NC, in 1983, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
13.
Vesilind, P. A., and Rimer, A. E., Unit Operations in Resource Recovery Engineering, Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981.
14.
Wolf, B. A., “The Behavior of Particles in Pulsing and Nonpulsing Air Classifiers,” thesis presented to Duke Univ., at Durham, NC, in 1983, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 112 • Issue 1 • April 1986
Pages: 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1986
Published in print: Apr 1986
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.