Auto‐Oxidation Effect on Flue Gas Sludge Systems
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 1
Abstract
Upsets to Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) sludge treatment systems may occur under auto‐oxidation conditions. Auto‐oxidation is the appreciable natural conversion of to due to lower loading (less than 1.2 lb inlet ) and operating pHs of lime/limestone FGD Systems. A 75–79% auto‐oxidized FGD sludge exhibits a mean particle diameter of 45 microns—considerably larger than unoxidized particles. The oxidized sludge reaches terminal settling velocity within 8–10 min, five times faster than unoxidized material. Auto‐oxidized waste settles in gravity thickeners to higher densities (0.85 g dry solids/ml) and to thicker underflows (40% solids). Rakearm overload and blanket consolidation can be avoided by proper drive mechanism design and underflow solids/density control, providing an 8 hr underflow surge/storage tank is recommended instead of thickener sludge blanket storage. Vacuum filtration of an sludge yields 25% greater solids in the cake as compared to a 30% oxidized material. To avoid cake‐cracking, reduce the degree of vacuum during incidents of autooxidation and provide dual filtrate receivers. Using predictive curves presented here, a Transportability Analysis was performed on a coal of 0.59–0.91% sulfur and of 10.00–21.50% ash. At an loading of 1.08 lb/MMBTU 38% solids (thickener underflow) or 63% solids (filter cake) could be achieved. Either filter by‐pass or adding less fly ash to the cake permits achieving a 75–85% solids transportability blend. Auto‐oxidized sludge/ash blends exhibit unconfined compressive strengths from 57–63 psi and permeabilities from
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baker, Michael Jr., Inc., “FGD Sludge Disposal Manual, 2nd Edition,” EPRI Report No. CS‐1515, Electric Power Research Institute, Sept., 1980.
2.
Borgwardt, R. H., “IERL‐STP Scrubber Studies Related to Forced Oxidation,” presented at the March 8–11, 1976, Environmental Protection Agency Flue Gas Desulfurization Symposium, held at New Orleans, La.
3.
Ellison, W., and Kutemeyer, P. M., “New Developments Advance Forced‐Oxidation FGD,” Power, Vol. 127, No. 2, Feb., 1983, pp. 43–45.
4.
Envirotech Corp., “Sludge Dewatering for FGD Products,” EPRI Report No. FP‐937, Electric Power Research Institute, May, 1979.
5.
Goodwin, R. W., “Oxidation of Flue Gas Desulfurization Waste and the Effect on Treatment Modes,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, Vol. 28, No. 1, Jan., 1978, pp. 35–39.
6.
Goodwin, R. W., “Design Optimization of a Flue Gas Desulfurization Sludge Handling System,” Proceedings of Columbia University Seminar on Pollution and Pollution and Water Resources, Vol. 9, 1975–1978, pp. 11–118.
7.
Goodwin, R. W., and Gleason, R. J., “Options for Treating and Disposing of Scrubber Sludge,” Combustion, Vol. 49, No. 10, Oct., 1978, pp. 37–41.
8.
Goodwin, R. W., Parikh, K. N., and Halpern, H. E., “Properties of Stabilized FGD Sludge,” presented at the June 25–30, 1978, Air Pollution Control Association 71st Annual Meeting, held at Houston, Tex.
9.
Jahnig, C. W., and Shaw, H., “A Comparative Assessment of Flue Gas Treatment Processes, Part I—Status and Design Basis,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, Vol. 31, No. 4, April, 1981, pp. 421–428.
10.
Jones, D. G., Hargrove, O. M., and Morasky, T. M., “Lime/Limestone Scrubber Operation and Control,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, Vol. 29, No. 10, Oct., 1979, p. 1103.
11.
Nesbit, W., et al., “Scrubbers: The Technology Nobody Wanted,” Electric Power Research Institute Journal, Vol. 7, No. 10, Oct., 1982, pp. 8–15.
12.
Santhanam, C. J., et al., Flue Gas Cleaning Wastes Disposal and Utilization, Noyes Data Corp., Park Ridge, N.J., 1981, p. 170.
13.
Schweiger, R., “Retrofit of Scrubbers Gives Way to Integral Design in New Units,” Power, Vol. 125, No. 11, Nov., 1981.
14.
Shattuck, D. M., et al., “Utah Power & Light's Experience with Wet Scrubbing of at the Huntington and Hunter Plants,” Proceedings of the American Power Conference, Vol. 42, 1980, p. 433.
15.
Traccerella, P. E., and Mohn, N. C., “Disposing of FGD Waste Using Stabilization and Fixation Processes,” presented at the Oct. 17–21, 1982, Joint Power Conference, held at Denver, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1985
Published in print: Sep 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.