Probabilistic Nonlocal Theory for Quasibrittle Fracture Initiation and Size Effect. I: Theory
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 126, Issue 2
Abstract
The nonlocal generalization of Weibull theory previously developed for structures that are either notched or fail only after the formation of a large crack is extended to predict the probability of failure of unnotched structures that reach the maximum load before a large crack forms, as is typical of the test of modulus of rupture (flexural strength). The probability of material failure at a material point is assumed to be a power function (characterized by the Weibull modulus and scaling parameter) of the average stress in the neighborhood of that point, the size of which is the material characteristic length. This indirectly imposes a spatial correlation. The model describes the deterministic size effect, which is caused by stress redistribution due to strain softening in the boundary layer of cracking with the associated energy release. As a basic check of soundness, it is proposed that for quasibrittle structures much larger than the fracture process zone or the characteristic length of material, the probabilistic model of failure must asymptotically reduce to Weibull theory with the weakest link model. The present theory satisfies this condition, but the classical stochastic finite-element models do not, which renders the use of these models for calculating loads of very small failure probabilities dubious. Numerical applications and comparisons to test results are left for Part II.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bažant, Z. P. (1984). “Size effect in blunt fracture: Concrete, rock, metal.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 110, 518–535.
2.
Bažant, Z. P. (1997a). “Scaling of quasibrittle fracture: Asymptotic analysis.” Int. J. Fracture, 83(1), 19–40.
3.
Bažant, Z. P. (1997b). “Scaling of quasibrittle fracture: Hypotheses of invasive and lacunar fractality, their critique and Weibull connection.” Int. J. Fracture, 83(1), 41–65.
4.
Bažant, Z. P. (1997c). “Statistical and fractal aspects of size effect in quasibrittle structures: Conspectus of recent results.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Struct. Safety and Reliability, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1255–1262.
5.
Bažant, Z. P. (1998). “Size effect in tensile and compression fracture of concrete structures: Computational modeling and design.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf., Fracture Mech. of Concrete Struct., H. Mihashi and K. Rokugo, eds., Aedificatio Publishers, Freiburg, Germany, 1905–1922.
6.
Bažant, Z. P., Belytschko, T. B., and Chang, T.-P. (1984). “Continuum model for strain softening.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 110, 1666–1692.
7.
Bažant, Z. P., and Cedolin, L. (1991). Stability of structures: Elastic, inelastic, fracture and damage theories. Oxford University Press, New York.
8.
Bažant, Z. P., and Li, Z. (1995). “Modulus of rupture: Size effect due to fracture initiation in boundary layer.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(4), 739–746.
9.
Bažant, Z. P., and Li, Z. (1996). “Discussion of `Fracture mechanics approach to evaluation of flexural strength of concrete,” by K. Rokugo, Y. Uchida, H. Katoh, and W. Koyanagi.” ACI Mat. J., 93(5), 507–510.
10.
Bažant, Z. P., and Lin, F.-B. (1988). “Non-local yield limit degradation.” J. Numer. Methods in Engrg., 26, 1805–1823.
11.
Bažant, Z. P., and Novák, D. ( 1999). “Energetic-statistical size effect in quasibrittle failure at crack initiation.” Rep., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Northwestern University (ACI Mat. J., in press).
12.
Bažant, Z. P., and Novák, D. (2000). “Probabilistic nonlocal theory for quasibrittle fracture initiation and size effect. II: Application.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 126(2), 175–185.
13.
Bažant, Z. P., and Ožbolt, J. (1990). “Nonlocal microplane model for fracture, damage, and size effect in structures.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(11), 2485–2505.
14.
Bažant, Z. P., and Pijaudier-Cabot, G. (1988). “Nonlocal continuum damage, localization instability and convergence.” J. Appl. Mech.—T. ASME, 55, 287–293.
15.
Bažant, Z. P., and Planas, J. (1998). Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
16.
Bažant, Z. P., and Xi, Y. (1991). “Statistical size effect in quasi-brittle structures. II: Nonlocal theory.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 117(11), 2623–2640.
17.
Bažant, Z. P., Xi, Y., and Reid, S. G. (1991). “Statistical size effect in quasi-brittle structures. I: Is Weibull theory applicable?”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 117(11), 2609–2622.
18.
Brenner, C. E. (1991). “Stochastic finite element methods (literature review).” Working Rep. No. 35–91, Inst. of Engrg. Mech., University of Innsbruck, Austria.
19.
Breysse, D. (1990). “Probabilistic formulation of damage evolution law of cementitious composites.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(7), 1489–1510.
20.
Breysse, D., and Fokwa, D. (1992). “Influence of disorder of the fracture process of mortar.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf., Fracture Mech. of Concrete Struct., Z. P. Bažant, ed., Elsevier, London, 536–541.
21.
Breysse, D., Fokwa, D., and Drahy, F. (1994). “Spatial variability in concrete: Nature, structure, and consequences.” Appl. Mech. Rev., ASME, 47(1), 184–196.
22.
Breysse, D., and Renaudin, P. (1996). “On the influence of local disorder on size effect.” Proc., IUTAM Symp., Size-Scale Effects in Failure Mechanisms of Mat. and Struct., A. Carpinteri, ed., E&FN Spon, London, 187–199.
23.
Bucher, C. G., and Bourgund, U. (1987). “Efficient use of response surface method.” Working Rep. No. 9-87, Inst. of Engrg. Mech., University of Innsbruck, Austria.
24.
Carpinteri, A., Chiaia, B., and Ferro, G. ( 1994). “Multifractal scaling law for the nominal strength variation of concrete structures.” Size effect in concrete structures, H. Mihashi, H. Okamura, and Z. P. Bažant, eds., E&FN Spon, London, 193–206.
25.
Carpinteri, A., Chiaia, B., and Ferro, G. (1995). “Size effect on nominal tensile strength of concrete structures: Multifractality of material ligaments and dimensional transition from order to disorder.” Mat. Struct., Paris, 28, 311–317.
26.
Fisher, R. A., and Tippett, L. H. C. (1928). “Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest and smallest member of a sample.” Proc., Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24, 180–190.
27.
Fréchet, M. (1927). “Sur la loi de probabilité de l'écart maximum.” Ann. Soc. Polon. Math. (Cracow) 6, 93.
28.
Ghanem, R., and Spanos, P. D. (1991). Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach. Springer, New York.
29.
Hillerborg, A., Modéer, M., and Petersson, P.-E. (1976). “Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements.” Cement and Concrete Res., 6(6), 773–782.
30.
Hisada, T., and Nakagiri, S. (1985). “The role of the stochastic finite element method in structural safety and reliability.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Struct. Safety and Reliability, Vol. I, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 385–394.
31.
Jirásek, M., and Bažant, Z. P. (1995a). “Macroscopic fracture characteristics of random particle systems.” Int. J. Fracture, 69(3), 201–228.
32.
Jirásek, M., and Bažant, Z. P. (1995b). “Particle model for quasibrittle fracture and application to sea ice.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 121(9), 1016–1025.
33.
Liu, W. K., Belytschko, T., and Mani, A. (1986). “Random field finite elements.” Int. J. Numer. Methods in Engrg., 23, 1831–1845.
34.
Madsen, H. O., Krenk, S., and Lind, N. C. (1986). Methods of structural safety. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
35.
Mariotte, E. (1686). Traité du mouvement des eaux, posthumously edited by M. de la Hire; English translation by J. T. Desvaguliers, London (1718), 249; also Mariotte's collected works, 2nd ed., The Hague (1740).
36.
Petersson, P.-E. (1981). “Crack growth and development of fracture zone in plain concrete and similar materials.” Rep. No. TVBM-1006, Div. of Build. Mat., Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden.
37.
Pijaudier-Cabot, G., and Bažant, Z. P. (1987). “Nonlocal damage theory.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 113(10), 1512–1533.
38.
Planas, J., Guinea, G. V., and Elices, M. ( 1995). “Rupture modulus and fracture properties of concrete.” Fracture mechanics of concrete structures, Vol. 1, F. H. Wittmann, ed., Aedificatio Publishers, Freiburg, Germany, 95–110.
39.
Roelfstra, P. E., Sadouki, H., and Wittmann, F. H. (1985). “Le béton numérique.” Mat. and Struct., 18, 327–335.
40.
Rokugo, K., Uchida, Y., Katoh, H., and Koyanagi, W. (1995). “Fracture mechanics approach to evaluation of flexural strength of concrete.” ACI Mat. J., 92(5), 561–566 (selected translation from Japan Concrete Institute).
41.
Schuëller, G. I. (1997). “Structural reliability—Recent advances.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Struct. Safety and Reliability, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, I, 3–35 (Freudenthal lecture).
42.
Schuëller, G. I., Bucher, C. G., Bourgund, U., and Ouypornprasert, W. (1989). “On efficient computational schemes to calculate structural failure probabilities.” Probabilistic Engrg. Mech., 4(1), 10–18.
43.
Tippett, L. H. C. (1925). “On the extreme individuals and the range of samples taken from a normal population.” Biometrika, 17, 364–387.
44.
Weibull, W. (1939). “The phenomenon of rupture in solids.” Proc., Royal Swedish Inst. of Engrg. Res. (Ingenioersvetenskaps Akad. Handl.) Stockholm, 153, 1–55.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 126 • Issue 2 • February 2000
Pages: 166 - 174
History
Received: Aug 20, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2000
Published in print: Feb 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.