Elastomeric Materials Used for Vibration Isolation of Railway Lines
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 124, Issue 6
Abstract
To attenuate disturbance in residential buildings located along metropolitan railway lines, special types of track bedding have been designed, based on fixation of the rail on floating slabs, resting on elastomeric materials. Laboratory tests on small elastomeric pads show that the energy dissipation, under cyclic loading of constant amplitude, can be suitably represented by a combination of a viscous and an hysteretic damping. A significant strain-rate sensitivity is evident. As a first approximation, the stiffness has been represented as an increasing function of frequency, characterized by an asymptotic value. The frequency range of 0–100 Hz has been investigated. Eight types of elastomeric materials have been tested. Comparison shows that the stiffness increases with the increase of the material density. The analytical model has been checked in two different experiences. (1) A prototype of a floating slab track, 14.8 m long, has been assembled in the laboratory and tested under fixed amplitude and harmonic loads. While the experiments on small pads were restricted to uniform loading conditions, the track prototype was excited by a concentrated load, thus inducing different deformations along the specimen, decreasing with the increase of the distance from the point of loading. (2) An experimental track, 100 m long, made up of the same set of elements of the prototype, has been inserted in a railway line. A series of vibration records has been collected during train passages. Comparisons between measured and computed vibrations were used to provide a specific notion of the relevance in a practical problem of the analytical assumptions. Errors in the evaluation of the peak displacement and of the root-mean-square value are limited to a few percent.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Castellani, A., Panzeri, P., and Pezzoli, P. (1995). “Vibrations along railway lines.”Vibration and Noise '95, Stafforshire University, ed.
2.
De Borts, R., van der Bogert, P. A. J., and Zeilmaker, J.(1988). “Modeling and analysis of rubberlike materials.”Heron, 33(1), 1–12.
3.
De Los Sanctos, M. A., Martinez, J., and Cardona, S. (1995). “A convolution method for determining the point deflection in a railway track submitted to vertical acceleration.”Vibration and Noise '95, Stafforshire University, ed.
4.
Diana, G., and Cheli, F.(1989). “Dynamic interaction of railway systems with large bridge.”Vehicle System Dynamics, 18, 71–106.
5.
Dupal, J., and Iwnicki, S. D. (1995). “Parameter optimization applied to a dynamic model of the suspension of a railway vehicle.”Vibration and noise '95, Stafforshire University, ed.
6.
Esveld, C. (1989). Modern railway track. Esveld Consulting Services, Zaltbommel, The Nederlands.
7.
Experimental Institute of the Italian National Railways. (EIINR). (1995). “Dynamic behaviour of a ballast-less track INPREVIB.”Doc. TC.I/T/046.130/21807.
8.
Garg, V. K., and Dukkipati, R. V. (1984). Dynamics of railway vehicle systems. Academic Press, Inc., Toronto, Canada.
9.
Garg, V. R., Chu, K. H., and Wang, L.(1985). “A study of railway bridge/vehicle interaction and evaluation of fatigue life.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 2, 689–709.
10.
Gutowski, T. G., and Dym, C. L.(1976). “Propagation of ground vibration: A review.”J. Sound and Vibration, 49(2), 179–193.
11.
ISMES. (1993a). “Characterisation tests of elastomeric mats for track system.”Project: DIS-7245.00 Doc. REL-DIS 0717/93, ISMES SPA, Bergamo, Italy.
12.
ISMES. (1993b). “Prefabricated urban slab track system: Rail mechanical admittance test.”Project: DIS-7245.00 Doc. REL-DIS 1695/93. ISMES SPA, Bergamo, Italy.
13.
Klasztorny, M., and Langer, J.(1990). “Dynamic response of single-span beam bridges to a series of moving loads.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 19, 1107–1124.
14.
Knopoff, L.(1954). “On the dissipative viscoelastic constants of higher order.”J. Acoustical Soc. of America, 26(2), 183–186.
15.
Kurtzweil, L. G., and Ungar, E. E. (1982). “Prediction of noise and vibration in buildings near the New York City subway.”Proc., Internoise 82, San Francisco, Calif., 213–216.
16.
Loh, C.-H., and Chung, S.-T.(1993). “A three-stage identification approach for hysteretic systems.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 22, 129–150.
17.
Melke, J.(1988a). “Noise and vibration from underground railway lines: Proposals for a prediction procedure.”J. Sound and Vibration, 120(2), 391–406.
18.
Melke, J., and Switaiski, B.(1988b). “Elastomer rail support systems: Problems in dynamic testing.”J. Sound and Vibration, 120(2), 421–429.
19.
Mohammadi, M., and Karabalis, D. L.(1995). “Dynamic 3-D soil-railway track interaction by BEM-FEM.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 24, 1177–1193.
20.
ORE. (1988). “Flèche admissible des ponts.”Question No. 160, Office for Research and Experimentation of the International Union of Railways, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
21.
ORE. (1989). “Vibrations transmitted through the ground.”Question D 151, Office for Research and Experimentation of the International Union Railways, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
22.
Peng, C.-Y., and Iwan, W. D.(1992). “An identification methodology for a class of hysteretic structures.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 21, 695–712.
23.
Sato, Y., Ohishi, F., Ando, K., and Miura, S.(1988). “Development of vibration-decreasing slab track of type G and its practical use.”Tech. Paper, Railway Technical Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 29(2), 51–55.
24.
Singh, V. V., and Deepak, D.(1984). “Evaluation of track stiffness and track damping.”J. Sound and Vibration, 97(1), 129–135.
25.
Tassilly, E., and Vincent, N. (1989). “Prevision et controle des vibrations transmises au sol par les trains.” Revue Generale des Chemins de Fer (in French).
26.
Volberg, G.(1983). “Propagation of ground vibrations near railway tracks.”J. Sound and Vibration, 87, 371–376.
27.
Yang, F., and Fonder, G.(1996). “An iterative solution method for dynamic response of bridge-vehicle systems.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 25, 195–215.
28.
Wilson, G. P., Saurenman, H. J., and Nelson, J. T.(1983). “Control of ground-borne noise and vibration.”J. Sound and Vibration, 87(2), 339–350.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 124 • Issue 6 • June 1998
Pages: 614 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1998
Published in print: Jun 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.