Modern Formulation for Preelastic Theories on Masonry Arches
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
The masonry arch as a system of rigid voussoirs subject to unilateral constraints has been investigated applying the principle of virtual work in order to define a general criterion providing the necessary and sufficient conditions for the equilibrium of the system. Since the assumptions of the formulation coincide with those of the preelastic theories, the main historical approaches have been revisited, showing that their criteria are encompassed in the present formulation. A parametric analysis has been carried out with reference to geometry and friction for a semicircular arch of constant thickness and subject to its own weight. The ranges of values for the thrust at the crown required for the equilibrium to exist have been thus determined and a geometric safety factor has been defined. A comparison of these results for the arch of minimum thickness with those obtained from the historical theories and more recent formulations has also been made.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Audoy. (1820). “Mémoire sur la poussée des voûtes en berceau.”Mémorial de l'Officier du Génie. Imprimerie Royale, Paris, France, No. 4, 1–96 (in French).
2.
Augusti, G., and Sinopoli, A.(1992). “Modeling the dynamics of large block structures.”Meccanica, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 27(3), 195–211.
3.
Benvenuto, E. (1991). An introduction to the history of structural mechanics. Springer Verlag, New York, N.Y.
4.
Benvenuto, E., Corradi, M., and Foce, F. (1988). “Sintesi storica sulla statica di archi, volte e cupole nel XIX secolo.”Palladio, Rivista di Storia dell'Architettura e Restauro, Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Roma, Italy, nuova serie, anno I, No. 2, 51–68 (in Italian).
5.
Boothby, T. E., and Brown, C. B.(1992). “Stability of masonry piers and arches.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 118(2), 367–383.
6.
Boothby, T. E.(1994). “Stability of masonry piers and arches including sliding.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 120(2), 304–319.
7.
Castigliano, A. (1879). Théorie de l'équilibre des systèmes élastiques et ses applications. Negro, Torino, Italy (in French).
8.
Coulomb, C. A. (1776). “Sur une application des règles de maximis & minimis à quelques problèmes de statique, relatifs à l'architecture.”Mémoires de mathématique et de physique, année 1773. Paris, France, 7, 343–382 (in French).
9.
De la Hire, P. (1731). “Sur la construction des voûtes dans les édifices.”Mémoires de l'académie royale des sciences, année 1712. Paris, France, 69–77 (in French).
10.
Delbecq, J. M. (1982). “Analyse de la stabilité des voûtes en maçonnerie par le calcul à la rupture.”Journale de Mécanique Théorique et Appliquée, 1(1), 91–121 (in French).
11.
Drucker, D. C.(1954). “Coulomb friction, plasticity and limit loads.”J. Appl. Mech., 21(1), 71–74.
12.
Franciosi, V., and Sinopoli, A.(1986). “The stability degree of masonry structures: the earthquake as collapse parameter.”Mech. Res. Communications, 13(4), 187–192.
13.
Gilbert, M., and Melbourne, C.(1994). “Rigid block analysis of masonry structures.”The Struct. Engrg., London, England, 72(21), 356–361.
14.
Heyman, J.(1966). “The stone skeleton.”Int. J. Solids and Struct., 2(2), 249–279.
15.
Heyman, J.(1967). “On shell solutions for masonry domes.”Int. J. Solids and Struct., 3(2), 227–241.
16.
Heyman, J.(1969). “The safety of masonry arches.”Int. J. Mech. Sci., 11(4), 363–385.
17.
Heyman, J. (1972). Coulomb's memoir on statics. An essay on the history of civil engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
18.
Heyman, J.(1988). “Poleni's problem.”Proc., Instn. Civ. Engrs., London, England, Part I, 84, 737–759.
19.
Kooharian, J.(1953). “Limit analysis of voussoir (segmental) and concrete arches.”J. Am. Concrete Inst., 89(1), 317–328.
20.
Livesley, R. K.(1978). “Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks.”Int. J. Numer. Methods in Engrg., 12, 1853–1871.
21.
Mascheroni, L. (1785). Nuove ricerche sull'equilibrio delle volte. Bergamo, Italy (in Italian).
22.
Persy, N. (1827). Cours de stabilité des constructions à l'usage des élèves de l'École royale de l'artillerie et du génie. Litog. de l'École Royale de l'Artillerie et du Génie de Metz, Metz, France, 2nd Ed. (in French).
23.
Petit (1835). “Mémoire sur le calcul des voûtes circulaires.”Mémorial de l'officier du Génie, Imprimerie Royale, Paris, France, No. 12, 73–150 (in French).
24.
Poncelet, J.-V. (1852). “Examen critique et historique des principales théories concernant l'équlibre des voûtes.”Comptes rendus, Paris, France, 35(15), 494–502; 35(16), 531–540; 35(17), 577–587 (in French).
25.
Radelet-De Grave, P., and Benvenuto, E., eds. (1995). Between mechanics and architecture. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland.
26.
Sacchi, G., and Save, M.(1968). “A note on the limit loads of non-standard materials.”Meccanica, Milan, Italy, 3(1), 43–45.
27.
Sinopoli, A.(1987). “Dynamics and impact in a system with unilateral constraints. The relevance of dry friction.”Meccanica, Bologna, Italy, 22(4), 210–215.
28.
Sinopoli, A. (1995). “Mechanical modelling of large block structures: a geometric formulation for the dynamics.”Proc., ASCE Struct. Congr.: Restructuring Am. and Beyond, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 976–991.
29.
Sinopoli, A., Corradi, M., and Foce, F. (1995). “A modern evaluation of the historical theories about masonry or stone arches.”Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Arch Bridges (Arch 95), Telford, London, England, 131–142.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 123 • Issue 3 • March 1997
Pages: 204 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1997
Published in print: Mar 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.