Maximum Structural Response Using Convex Models
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 122, Issue 4
Abstract
Five different convex models are defined to represent sets of uncertain inputs. Analytical expressions are obtained for the response maxima on these convex models. We show that traditional predictions of maximum response can yield values substantially lower than those predicted by the convex models. This suggests that the traditional tools, both deterministic and stochastic, may lead to unsafe design decisions, because larger maxima are obtained from the convex models with phenomenologically similar inputs. The low predictions of the traditional methods can be remedied by empirical multiplicative correction factors. However, this tends to disguise the inherent structural-dynamic causes at play. Convex modeling may provide a method for identifying and incorporating pertinent structural and input properties in the analysis of maximum responses, with reduced need for approximate correction factors.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ben-Haim, Y., and Elishakoff, I. (1990). Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2.
Drenick, R. F. (1968). “Functional analysis of effects of earthquakes.”2nd Joint United States–Japan Seminar on Applied Stochastics, Washington, D.C.
3.
Drenick, R. F.(1970). “Model-free design of aseismic structures.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 96(3), 483–493.
4.
Haftka, R. T., and Kao, P.-J. (1990). “The use of optimization for sharpening differences between models.”Winter Annual Meeting, ASME, New York, N.Y.
5.
Hoff, N. J.(1951). “The dynamics of the buckling of elastic columns.”J. Appl. Mech., 18(1), 68–71.
6.
Housner, G. W., and Jennings, P. C.(1964). “Generation of artificial earthquakes.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 90(1), 113–142.
7.
Kanai, K.(1957). “Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground.”Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., Tokyo, Japan, 35, 351–367.
8.
Lin, Y. K. (1986). Probabilistic theory of structural dynamics, Krieger, Melbourne, Fla.
9.
Lindberg, H. E.(1992). “Convex models for uncertain imperfection uncertainty control in multimode dynamic buckling.”J. Appl. Mech., 59, 937–945.
10.
Shinozuka, M.(1970). “Maximum structural response to seismic excitations.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 96, 729–738.
11.
Tajimi, H. (1960). “A statistical method of determining the maximum earthquake response of a building structure during an earthquake.”2nd World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Int. Assoc. of Earthquake Engrg., Tokyo, Japan, 781–797.
12.
Uniform building code. (1991). Int. Conf. of Build. Officials, Whittier, Calif.
13.
Vanmarke, E. H. (1976). “Structural response to earthquakes.”Seismic risk and engineering decisions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Chapter 8.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1996
Published in print: Apr 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.