Error Evaluation of Three Random‐Field Generators
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 120, Issue 12
Abstract
The use of multidimensional random fields to model real engineering systems is gaining acceptance as personal computer systems become increasingly powerful. The accuracy of such models depends directly on the accuracy of the algorithm used to generate realizations of the representative random fields; there is a need to evaluate and compare various random‐field generators. To address the issue, three common random field generators are considered in this paper: (1) The fast Fourier transform (FFT) method; (2) the Turning bands method (TBM); and (3) the local average subdivision (LAS) method. For each, an ensemble of realizations of a two‐dimensional homogeneous Gauss‐Markov process is generated and the field mean, variance, and covariance structures are checked for statistical accuracy. Concerns such as ease of use and efficiency are also considered. All three methods have distinct advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of algorithm will depend on the particular application. A number of guidelines and suggestions are made to help avoid or minimize problems associated with each method.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cooley, J. W., and Tukey, J. W. (1965). “An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series.” Mathematics of Computation, 19(90), 297–301.
2.
Fenton, G. A., and Vanmarcke, E. H. (1990). “Simulation of random fields via local average subdivision.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(8), 1733–1749.
3.
Fenton, G. A. (1990). “Simulation and analysis of random fields,” PhD thesis, Princeton Univ., Princeton, N.J.
4.
Mantoglou, A., and Wilson, J. L. (1981). “Simulation of random fields with the turning bands method.” Rep. #264, Dept. Civ. Engrg., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
5.
Matheron, G. (1973). “The intrinsic random functions and their applications.” Adv. in Appl. Probability, Vol. 5, 439–468.
6.
Mignolet, M. P., and Spanos, P. D. (1992). “Simulation of homogeneous two‐dimensional random fields: part I—AR and ARMA models.” J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 59, S260–S269.
7.
Shinozuka, M., and Jan, C. M. (1972). “Digital simulation of random processes and its applications.” J. Sound Vibration, 25(1), 111–128.
8.
Spanos, P. D., and Mignolet, M. P. (1992). “Simulation of homogeneous two‐dimensional random fields: Part II—MA and ARMA models.” J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 59, S270–S277.
9.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1984). Random fields: analysis and synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
10.
Yaglom, A. M. (1962). An introduction to the theory of stationary random functions. Dover, Mineola, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 18, 1993
Published online: Dec 1, 1994
Published in print: Dec 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.