Complete Stiffness Matrices for Buckling Analysis of Frames
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 119, Issue 2
Abstract
The present paper attempts to explain the significance of the various terms that must be included in an element stiffness matrix of a beam finite element to yield correct results in buckling analyses of spatial frames. The complete stiffness matrices for the buckling and post‐buckling analysis of three‐dimensional elastic framed structures are derived for the straight prismatic beam element with doubly symmetric cross section. The assumed small‐strain hypothesis permitted closed‐form expressions to be arrived at. Derivations of the elastic and geometric matrices of a generic beam element are first reviewed. All stress resultants are included in the geometric stiffness matrix. The contribution of the conservative external surface loads having moment resultants to the stiffness matrix is then formulated. The so‐called energy method of stiffness derivation used commonly by engineers is argued to yield correct results when relevant load‐stiffness terms are included. The resulting expressions are easier to understand than their counterparts known from the papers advocating semitangential rotations and moments. Finally, the actual way of application of the external moments is included in the system stiffness matrix and it is shown that the tangential operator of the assembled system is symmetric. The present element stiffness matrices can be easily incorporated into finite‐element codes by only correcting those already implemented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Argyris, J. H., Balmer, H., Doltsinis, I. St., Dunne, P. C., Haase, M., Kleiber, M., Malejannakis, G. A., Mlejnek, H.‐P., Muller, M., and Scharpf, D. W. (1979). “Finite element method—The natural approach.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 17/18, 1–106.
2.
Argyris, J. H., Dunne, P. C., and Scharpf, D. W. (1978). “On large displacement‐small strain analysis of structures with rotational degrees of freedom.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 14/15, 401–451, 99–135.
3.
Iura, M., and Atluri, S. N. (1988). “Dynamic analysis of finitely stretched and rotated 3‐D space‐curved beam.” Comput. Struct., 29, 875–889.
4.
Iura, M., and Atluri, S. N. (1989). “On a consistent theory, and variational formulation of finitely stretched and rotated 3‐D space curved beam.” Comput. Mech., 4, 73–88.
5.
Kleiber, M. (1989). “Incremental finite element modelling in nonlinear solid mechanics.” Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England.
6.
Malvern, L. E. (1969). Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
7.
Simo, J. C. (1992). “The (symmetric) Hessian for geometrically nonlinear models in solid mechanics: Intrinsic definition and geometric interpretation.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 96, 189–200.
8.
Simo, J. C., and Vu‐Quoc, L. (1988). “On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions—A geometrically exact approach.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 66, 125–161.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 13, 1992
Published online: Feb 1, 1993
Published in print: Feb 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.