Optimal Importance‐Sampling Density Estimator
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 118, Issue 6
Abstract
Importance‐sampling technique has been used in recent years in conjunction with Monte Carlo simulation method to evaluate the reliability of structural systems. Since the efficiency of the importance‐sampling method depends primarily on the choice of the importance‐sampling density, the use of the kernel method to estimate the optimal importance‐sampling density is proposed. This method deviates from the current practice of prescribing the importance‐sampling density from a given parametric family of density functions. Instead, the data obtained from an initial Monte Carlo run are utilized to determine the required importance‐sampling density. The kernel method yields unbiased estimates of the probability of failure. Two measures are developed to quantify the efficiency of the kernel method relative to the basic Monte Carlo method. The first measure, called the marginal efficiency, is used as an indicator of the effectiveness of the kernel method, whereas the second measure, the overall efficiency, defines the advantage of the kernel method over the basic Monte Carlo method. Finally, a variety of example problems are used to examine the characteristics of the proposed kernel method and its efficiency over the basic Monte Carlo method.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ang, G. L., Ang, A. H.‐S., and Tang, W. H. (1989). “Kernel method in importance sampling density function.” Structural safety and reliability, A. H.‐S. Ang, M. Shinozuka, and G. I. Schueller, eds., Proc. of ICOSSAR '89, ASCE, New York, N.Y. Vol. II, 1193–1200.
2.
Ang, G. L. (1991). “Kernel method in Monte Carlo importance sampling,” PhD thesis, University of Illinois, at Urbana, Illinois.
3.
Abramson, I. S. (1982). “On bandwidth variation in kernel estimates—a square root law.” Ann. Statist., 10(4), 1217–1223.
4.
Bourgund, U., and Bucher, C. G. (1986). “Importance sampling procedure using design points (ISPUD)—a user's manual.” Report No. 8, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
5.
Harbitz, A. (1982). “A level 3 accurate probability of failure calculation method.” Proc. of Euromech 155 on Reliability Theory of Structural Engineering System, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 337–346.
6.
Harbitz, A. (1986). “An efficient sampling method for probability of failure calculation.” Struct. Safety, 3(2), 109–115.
7.
Ibrahim, Y., and Cornell, C. A. (1988). “Experiences with applications of importance sampling in structural reliability computation.” Probabilistic methods in civil engineering, P. D. Spanos, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 344–347.
8.
Karamchandari, A. (1990). “New methods in system reliability.” Report No. RMS‐7, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
9.
Rubinstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte‐Carlo method. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
10.
Schueller, G. I., and Stix, R. (1987). “A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities.” Struct. Safety, 4(4), 293–309.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1992
Published in print: Jun 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.